Where's OIC, the "Muslim" NATO and the Ummah on Trumps attack on Pakistan?

[MultaniGuy]

Pakistan’s JF-17 Thunder is ready to join Myanmar Air Force

So It's okay when your country sells weapons to those who kill Rohingyas, but it's not okay when America sells weapons to Saudi Arabia because Trump accused Pakistan of being "Terrorist heaven" which is the same accusation that your beloved Iran used against Pakistan two months ago.

Let me remind you,
Russia are bombing the Syrian rebels in Syria.

Every country does what is in it's national interests.

 

[MastanKhan]

I don't have the thread bookmarked, but I do remember a few posters saying how Pakistan joining the Alliance means that we now have our man in the Middle East who will be able to wield enormous influence etc.

But I respectfully disagree when you say Pakistan's influence disappeared after rejecting the Yemen quicksand, because frankly I don't believe Pakistan ever had any influence in the Middle east beforehand. People who have something to give are able to exert influence, what were we giving before we were "asked" to go to Yemen?



But when I was younger, I was told all the Muslim countries look up to Pakistan, was I fed a lie?

Hi,

When did pakistan join the alliance---oh---you mean the TOKEN alliance---.

The one where you chose from being THE STAR to the one being sweeping the streets.

Your belief that pakistan had no influence is not correct---because my resource being much deeper than yours say otherwise---.

The COWARDICE that Gen Raheel Sharif showed in this matter will come to light in a decade or so---he is a worthless man---he is not a traitor like Gen Kiyani---but this guy is not very smart.

Just remember---that the worst of the generals is picked up to be the commander in chief of the military----.

He got to the rank of general because of his brother's Nishan a Haider---otherwise he did not merit that position---.

NOTE:---A lot of posters have banged it hard on me on this issue---and I was wondering---why so----.

I then asked myself this question---WHO BENEFITS

INDIA---IRAN

 

[Pakistani E]

Hi,

When did pakistan join the alliance---oh---you mean the TOKEN alliance---.

The one where you chose from being THE STAR to the one being sweeping the streets.

Your belief that pakistan had no influence is not correct---because my resource being much deeper than yours say otherwise---.

The COWARDICE that Gen Raheel Sharif showed in this matter will come to light in a decade or so---he is a worthless man---he is not a traitor like Gen Kiyani---but this guy is not very smart.

Just remember---that the worst of the generals is picked up to be the commander in chief of the military----.

He got to the rank of general because of his brother's Nishan a Haider---otherwise he did not merit that position---.

NOTE:---A lot of posters have banged it hard on me on this issue---and I was wondering---why so----.

I then asked myself this question---WHO BENEFITS

INDIA---IRAN

So do you believe that becoming part of that alliance with full commitment was in the best interest of Pakistan, even if it meant sending troops in to Yemen?

The Iranian role in flaming sectarian tensions in the Middle-east and wider region is not hidden from anyone and whoever denies is being plain dishonest, but do you not believe that Saudi Arabia and other GCC countries themselves have also fed the flames of sectarianism?

Keeping this in mind, do you still believe that Pakistan should commit itself to fully siding with Saudi Arabia and other countries even when we hear nothing from them issues such that are sensitive to us? Both Iran and Saudi Arabia are pretty close to India, do you truly believe that siding with one nation over the other would give us enough influence to make them rethink their policies with India?

As for what influence we already have, I know as much as I need to I think. My father is also ex services and was in a Middle Eastern nation for over 10 years. We are providing services as individuals and not in a position to influence their decisions. For example, when UAE little man syndrome minister was "threatening" Pakistan, how many Pakistanis were serving in his government's military and intelligence branches and which of them resigned and left?

Arey kya mazak krdia apne anyway didn't you know that Pakistan is the only thekedar of "Ummah" the myth? it was always a myth and will remain that way everyone put their country above everything but it's only Pakistan where we give our country the least importance and i am sure this question of yours had and will hurt a LOT of people on this forum.

I don't actually mean to hurt anyone, I want my countrymen to think for themselves about the narrative they have been fed for generations and how true it is in the real world.

I personally know many people who read this forum but don't post, a lot of my posts are also directed at these nameless readers and not just those who post here.

Which brotherhood are you talking about and where on the forum were you told about this?

It's in the title.

 

[MastanKhan]

So do you believe that becoming part of that alliance with full commitment was in the best interest of Pakistan, even if it meant sending troops in to Yemen?

The Iranian role in flaming sectarian tensions in the Middle-east and wider region is not hidden from anyone and whoever denies is being plain dishonest, but do you not believe that Saudi Arabia and other GCC countries themselves have also fed the flames of sectarianism?

Keeping this in mind, do you still believe that Pakistan should commit itself to fully siding with Saudi Arabia and other countries even when we hear nothing from them issues such that are sensitive to us? Both Iran and Saudi Arabia are pretty close to India, do you truly believe that siding with one nation over the other would give us enough influence to make them rethink their policies with India?

As for what influence we already have, I know as much as I need to I think. My father is also ex services and was in a Middle Eastern nation for over 10 years. We are providing services as individuals and not in a position to influence their decisions. For example, when UAE little man syndrome minister was "threatening" Pakistan, how many Pakistanis were serving in his government's military and intelligence branches and which of them resigned and left?



I don't actually mean to hurt anyone, I want my countrymen to think for themselves about the narrative they have been fed for generations and how true it is in the real world.

I personally know many people who read this forum but don't post, a lot of my posts are also directed at these nameless readers and not just those who post here.



It's in the title.

Hi,

The most important aspect of that military committment was a strike force ready on India's flank.

If the GCC wants troops---then you tell them what they need---your assessment says that they need 150K troops---independent from everything else and with full armor---artillery---special forces---air---navy---strike capability---.

Saudi arabia and emirates qatar oman etc were always closer to pakistan---. With that many troops in the region---the closeness would have grown into fondness.

The fortunes of nations are built on oil---minerals or on military endeavors---.

You sell your industry---.

 

[Imad.Khan]

Rohingyas are another proof that there is no such thing as Ummah. And for all the people that sing praises for Arabs, not a single Arab country has dared to raise it voice or open its doors. The only Muslim country to have raised a voice for them is Turkey.