What's new

Where China Meets India

Yeti

BANNED
Joined
Nov 26, 2010
Messages
7,400
Reaction score
-7
Country
India
Location
Thailand
A country that sits between two aspiring superpowers has some very complicated choices to make. Yet Burma, whose entire upper half is wedged between north-eastern India and south-western China, seems to have consistently made the wrong choices through much of the 20th century and all of the 21st. It emerged as a modern nation in 1948, its decolonisation from Britain a messy and traumatic affair that included the mysterious assassination, a year before independence, of some of its most important leaders. Its contentious democratic system, marked by hostilities between nationalists and communists, and between the Buddhist, Burmese-speaking majority known as Burmans and the largely Christian hill tribes, soon broke down into full-fledged civil war.
Still, none of this marked it out as an unusual nation at the time. Its vast neighbours India and China had, and were indeed still undergoing, their own crises, which included civil war and large-scale massacres. Yet when the nationalist military took over in Burma in 1962, the result was something like an army in possession of a state. And although the names of governing councils have been changed, the generals in charge moved around and even the national economic path switched from "the Burmese way to socialism" to capitalism, there has been a military junta in power for over half a century, its intentions mostly inscrutable to the west. The favourite adjective for this junta in the western media, based only partially on the fact that George Orwell served as an imperial policeman in Burma in the 1920s, is "Orwellian".
Where China meets India is an attempt to offer a nuanced portrait of Burma, especially of the paradox where a seemingly static country, subject to economic sanctions from Europe and the United States, is also poised between two of the most dynamic, and rapacious, powers in the world. "Burma and the New Crossroads of Asia", the book's subtitle reads, and its author, Thant Myint-U, makes clear that this seeming backwater is a place where some kind of fundamental reorientation is taking place, with a colourful combination of ethnic militias, drug lords, sex workers, businessmen and migrant populations floating back and forth across a grey frontier zone.
Travelling to Lashio, in the north-eastern corner of Burma, Thant writes about the quasi-independent territory carved out by the United Wa State Army, former headhunters, former anti-junta guerrillas, and now drug lords and allies of the junta: "The dirt roads become Chinese highways. And much of the Wa zone is on the Chinese electricity grid, and even its internet and mobile phone grid. BlackBerrys don't work in Rangoon but they do in the Wa area … It's a stunning reversal in Burma's geography. What had been remote is now closer to the new centre. What were muddy mountain hamlets are now more modern than Rangoon."
When Thant crosses the border into China, he finds shopping malls, amusement parks and heritage tourism, all evidence of the growing consumerism that is one of the factors driving China's alliance with the Burmese junta. In the absence of competition from the west, China can not only push the global market into what was once the frontier, it can also lay a claim to Burma's considerable natural resources. It could be the beginning, Thant writes, of a new Great Game in which India and China take on the roles once occupied by British India and tsarist Russia, with each aspiring superpower wary about the other, both eager for access to the vast reserves of natural gas off the Burmese coast, and with China especially anxious to secure access to the Bay of Bengal and create an alternative shipping route for the vast quantities of fuel required by its growth engine.
Thant writes compellingly about how both India and China have changed their attitudes towards the military junta. Each, originally, backed opponents to the regime, with China shoring up the Burmese communists and India throwing its support behind the pro-democracy movement led by Aung San Suu Kyi, winner of the Nobel peace prize (and whose father Aung San was one of the nationalist leaders killed in 1947). Suu Kyi was recently released by the junta after nearly two decades of detention, and her party, the National League for Democracy, although immensely popular in the 80s and 90s, seems to have since withered under the repressive measures of the state apparatus.
India, meanwhile, has largely abandoned the pro-democracy movement, including the activists it once encouraged to cross the border. It has now adopted a policy of placating the junta, unblushingly escorting its then senior leader, General Than Shwe, around when he recently visited such sites as Bodhgaya, where the Buddha is said to have attained enlightenment, and the Mahatma Gandhi memorial. Just as China has plans to push southwards from Kunming into Burma and the Bay of Bengal, India has its own "Look East" policy, which includes blueprints for a grand Trans-Asia Highway that will link the poor, violent states of its north-eastern corner to Burma and, eventually, to China.
It is fairly clear where Thant's sympathies lie in this new Great Game. The grandson of a former secretary general of the United Nations, Thant is a cosmopolitan who has grown up in the west. He shares the west's unease about China, especially its tendency to suppress minority groups and individual liberties. Like many liberal westerners, he is less aware of India's similarly poor record when dealing with its own minorities and dissenters. But he can also see that while China means business in expanding into Burma, India's parallel policy is mostly talk, the Trans-Asia Highway still consisting of imaginary lines superimposed upon old highways filled with potholes.
Thant is less compelling when addressing these wonkish questions than when he is acting as an idiosyncratic cultural historian. This was the strength of his previous book, The River of Lost Footsteps: A Personal History of Burma, which, in spite of its melancholy about Burma's present, offered a visible delight at the country's rich, varied past and its links with India and China. There are similar forays into history in the current book as well, moments where Thant revels in stories of the past – about the Naxi people, who might have inspired James Hilton's novel Lost Horizon; about the influence of Hinduism, Buddhism and Islam on the area – and becomes a sort of time traveller, wise and solitary, as he takes in the glass storefronts and plasma screens but also reflects on the world that has passed. At such moments, when his writing is shot through with a sense of history, the book possesses a heartfelt and welcome optimism, giving voice to a desire for connections that exceeds all notions of foreign policy, geopolitics or business and becomes, instead, about people encountering each other in all their glorious difference.
Siddhartha Deb's The Beautiful and the Damned: Life in the New India is published by Viking.


A welcome study of Burma's relations with its powerful neighbours

http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2011/aug/19/where-china-meets-india-review
 
. . . .
Currently! Agree......

In coming Decades......Who knows?

Who knows yaar. If india and pak get rid of corrupt politicos they could go very far

---------- Post added at 11:31 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:29 PM ----------

glad that you can predict the future!! Can you predict Pakistan's?? I know pakistan's manufacturing date but please your honour tell me its expiry date??

Stick to thread troll. Its about China and india. You need to get over your pakistan obsession. I mean the height of sadness must be for you an indian to be on pak def forum trolling on a sat night:rofl:
 
.
China has the potential to be a super power. India are no where in terms of being a super power.
Seeing the recent trends in the last 1-2 decades..India has been doing exactly what China has been doing.2 fastest growing major economies etc are examples.Just the gap has been of 5-8 years.So you are being biased!
 
.
China has the potential to be a super power. India are no where in terms of being a super power.

Popcorn-01-Michael-Jackson.gif
 
. . . .
China has the potential to be a super power. India are no where in terms of being a super power.

Now that your complex is satisfied, we can discuss further. :coffee:. Why don't you come back to your country and show her some love physically rather than sitting in UK, getting their benefits and flaming on the internet? I think knowledgeable work is what Pakistan needs rather than off-benefits non-resident Pakistanis from Europe.
 
.
two aspiring superpowers ? China doesn't have any intention to be a Superpower, But India needs to be a superpower I'd feel 1000x safer if India was the worlds policeman noting the incredible india can't do.
 
. .
two aspiring superpowers ? China doesn't have any intention to be a Superpower, But India needs to be a superpower I'd feel 1000x safer if India was the worlds policeman noting the incredible india can't do.

No offence but...:what::what:
 
. .

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom