What's new

When the US Earns Praise From Terrorists

AgNoStiC MuSliM

ADVISORS
Joined
Jul 11, 2007
Messages
25,259
Reaction score
87
Country
Pakistan
Location
United States
When the US Earns Praise From Terrorists

Have you ever heard any terrorist group, especially the ones operating in our region, having praised the United States? Certainly not. Terrorist groups actually thrive on anti-American sentiments. Hence, no group would risk saying a word or two in favour of the US. But recently one terrorist outfit changed that equation. The Jamaat-ul-Ahrar (JuA), a splinter group of the outlawed Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), lauded the US. And that was for its efforts to prevent the group’s chief, Omar Khalid Khurasani, being placed on the UN Security Council’s Sanctions Committee list. It was unprecedented that a terrorist group praised the US.

Although specific details are not available that on what grounds the US shot down Pakistan’s proposal, Foreign Office staff suggested that Washington objected to Pakistan’s stance that Khurasani was in Afghanistan. But that cannot and must not be a valid reason to veto the Pakistani request. Whether he is in Afghanistan or Pakistan, the key issue is that he is a known terrorist. His JuA has claimed a number of deadly terrorist attacks inside Pakistan. That was the reason that Pakistan expressed its disappointment over the UNSC sanction committee’s failure to place Khurasani on the list.

But why has the US shielded a known terrorist and risked being seen as playing a double game, a description Washington often uses for Pakistan? The answer lies in the current state of ties between Pakistan and the US. Despite recent diplomatic efforts, the two countries have yet to find a common ground on how to end the lingering conflict in Afghanistan. The Trump administration is frustrated over what it believes is lack of Pakistan’s will to take on groups such as the Haqqani network and the Afghan Taliban. It has suspended security assistance and threatened other punitive action to persuade Pakistan to change its approach. What Pakistan has been saying all along is that it cannot be made a scapegoat and that it will not fight the Afghan war on its soil. The US does not like this approach and desperately wants Pakistan to fight the war on its terms. The Trump administration’s coercive policy hasn’t yet delivered the desired results. In this backdrop, there is a possibility that the Trump administration has now decided to use certain militant groups operating in Afghanistan against Pakistan. It is like you scratch my back, I scratch yours. By shielding Khurasani from sanctions, the US may be sending a message to Pakistan that if you don’t mend your ways then better be prepared to face the consequences. The US may be contemplating using terrorist groups such as the JuA as a bargaining chip against Pakistan.

What this approach shows that after 17 years of war, still there is no consensus among the key international and regional players to fight terrorism. Pakistan, a state that has successfully driven terrorists out of the tribal areas, continues to be blamed for following a selective approach. But Pakistan has its own list of grievances. One of them is that the US and Afghan forces have not done enough against the anti-Pakistan elements currently operating from across the border. In fact, Islamabad has said it publicly that the TTP and its affiliates enjoy the backing of the Afghan secret service, the National Directorate of Security (NDS), and Indian Research and Analysis Wing (RAW). The latest US move at the UN sanctions committee meeting has added new dimension to the complicated game being played in Afghanistan. Relations between Pakistan and the US are already at its lowest ebb. Indications are that this downward slide will continue with the two sides imposing reciprocal restrictions on each other’s diplomats. These disturbing developments will only lead to more chaos.

Published in The Express Tribune, May 14th, 2018.
https://tribune.com.pk/story/1709457/6-us-earns-praise-terrorists/
====

This is not the first time the US has turned a blind eye towards terrorists attacking Pakistan. The US looked the other way when it came to BLA/BRA terrorists being sheltered by Afghanistan for years, and facilitated their escape to Europe. The US has also looked the other way, if not supported, Afghan support and cooperation with TTP terrorists carrying out attacks in Pakistan.
 
I am so happy today that finally we are on the same page regarding the US. There were different times when the US was exploiting divide. Today the US is in serious trouble. The US has to hide behind PTM and terrorist groups. Pakistanis are massively united and understand the threat.

Understanding and identifying the threat is half the solution.
 
Last edited:
Should've realized it much earlier. There's so many countries to serve as case studies to compel us to understand this point yet our pathetic diplomat and army class liked being Western wh0res.
 
Should've realized it much earlier. There's so many countries to serve as case studies to compel us to understand this point yet our pathetic diplomat and army class liked being Western wh0res.

We still have rotten apples. Make no mistake, but they are insignificant. We have come a very long way. Just compare this during the Musharraf era.
 
This is not the first time the US has turned a blind eye towards terrorists attacking Pakistan. The US looked the other way when it came to BLA/BRA terrorists being sheltered by Afghanistan for years, and facilitated their escape to Europe. The US has also looked the other way, if not supported, Afghan support and cooperation with TTP terrorists carrying out attacks in Pakistan.
If we are all to believe that “allies” means allies then we need to wake up.

Back in 2006, the agency office in Peshawar’s consulate was activly trying to get information on the meeting between the British Ambassador and some tribals.
Later on they made all efforts to sabotage UK efforts to reconcile certain Taliban factions for their benefit in the area they were deployed. In other words, the agency head was willing to let British soldiers face more attacks rather than resolve into peace there.

Go read “the looming tower” if you can to get an idea.

Then again, it was an active ISI section that advised the Taliban to hijack a bus in the 90s so that the PAF would give them F-7s for their airforce.

Only the Israelis are focused and united in their purpose most of the time.
 
more than 300 afghan soldiers killed in last 3 days.
500 including 15 commanders surrendered to afghan Taliban today.
you do things like that and you will have to pay the price.
 
They received praise over the false chemical attack too! lets us not forget!!
 
rfj-logo.png
Rewards for Justice
Stop a terrorist. Save lives.


Wanted
Information that brings to justice…
abdul_wali.jpg

Abdul Wali

Up to $3 Million Reward

Abdul Wali is the leader of Jamaat ul-Ahrar (JuA), a militant faction affiliated with Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP). He reportedly operates from Afghanistan’s Nangarhar and Kunar Provinces.

Under Wali’s leadership, JuA has been one of the most operationally active TTP networks in Punjab Province and has claimed multiple suicide bombings and other attacks throughout Pakistan.

In March 2016, JuA conducted a suicide bombing at a public park in Lahore, Pakistan that killed 75 people and injured 340.

In August 2015, JuA claimed responsibility for a suicide bombing in Punjab that killed Punjab Home Minister Shuja Khanzada and 18 of his supporters.

Wali is also known as Omar Khalid Khorasani. He was born in Mohmand Agency, Pakistan and is believed to be in his late-thirties. He is a former journalist and poet and studied at a number of madrasas in Karachi.

Additional Photos



 
If we are all to believe that “allies” means allies then we need to wake up.
Absolutely!

I have no illusions about 'loyalty' when it comes to 'allies' in international affairs, whether it's the US, Saudis or even China.

Commentary such as that in the OP is meant primarily as means of propagating the Pakistani view and an attempt to inform more Pakistanis and perhaps give Pakistanis more 'talking points' when it comes to presenting the Pakistani position.
 
This is linked with the current political climate in Pakistan, Pakistan is facing a new style warfare, this is how wars are fought now, before you even invade a country you can just sow enough dissent that in case of a invasion the enemy cannot put up a untied resistance.

USA & its allies are known to spread misinformation about other countries, then the dehumanisation of the said country takes place to prepare their soldiers and populations mentally, the point of dehumanisation is to convince your population that the enemy deserves to be bombed and killed. USA has done this since 50's and will continue to do so until some other countries step in and challenge US.
 
"The fact that a self-proclaimed tough-on-terror Trump administration refused to recognize Khorasani as a UN-designated terrorist speaks volumes about the White House's determination to undermine Pakistan.

Islamabad has retaliated to one of these moves. It imposed its own restrictions on US diplomats, including one that forbids them from using vehicles with tinted glass. The privacy and security implications of such a move could be unnerving to Washington.

US officials may not be taking the harshest possible measures in Pakistan, but they're still provoking hard and hurting feelings there. Khorasani has been implicated in dozens of attacks across Pakistan; few terrorists have as much Pakistani blood on their hands.

Understandably, Pakistani officialdom and the Pakistani public alike are incensed about Washington's refusal to sanction him at the UN."

https://www.cnn.com/2018/05/15/opinions/pakistan-us-diplomat-intl/index.html
 
Back
Top Bottom