nForce
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2010
- Messages
- 8,910
- Reaction score
- -1
- Country
- Location
A question of strategic importance
What did India get by carving out Bangladesh with no strategic gains in mind. It is much like the empty brained atal bihari vajpaye othering indian millitary to mobilise and lost 700+ soldiers for no reason. Indias moves completely destabilized asia and encouraged Pakistan to be a part of Afganistan fiasco, dissolution of USSR and today's unstable situation of Asia. Which only affirms the belief that India is a unstable and fragile country which could set fire to whole region which its twisted hegemonic ambitions!
I think I had addressed that at the beginning of the thread.
Well,its not like India carved out BD from Pakistan.The Bengalis of East Bengal pretty much did it.India gave the finishing touch.
Benefits for India?
Well Pakistan had a hostile attitude towards India since inception.So,its better to have a hostile Pakistan on one front less.Better to have hostility on Western border only,rather than on Eastern front as well.We dont maintain much army and heavy equipments in the Eastern border with BD.Same is with airforce and navy.So,our cost and other burden comes down.
We have a higher level of trade with BD,something that would not have happened with East Pakistan,or there would have been very less chance for it.
The Pakistani army was totally demoralized,something which was required from Indian point of view.