Asif Durrani
BANNED
New Recruit
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2015
- Messages
- 71
- Reaction score
- 1
- Country
- Location
@Akheilos - good simple way to explain one way perfectly normal people end up in / remain in poverty. There of course are many other ways:
* the person who inherits all wealth and doesn't realize value of money and ends up splurging his/her way to poverty
* the kid from an affluent family that gets into great school through affluence but throws it all away via excesses
* the kid whose rich parents simply provide money but no parenting
...and so on.
@Asif Durrani - why this urge to label (whether as con/lib or pious/atheist or dark/bright....)? Isn't poverty a human condition that regardless of which means one understands it to arise, is more importantly solved or helped solved? In my experience, thoughtful humans, whether conservative or liberal, differ from each other only on a minority of issues and are mostly are in concurrence. It is the extremes that imagine a black and white divide on such grounds. I for example strongly believe in free markets & capitalistic environments and strongly believe in equality of all. So does it matter that the extreme liberal calls me a conservative pig and the neocon calls me a weed smoking hippy? All I stand for in this dimension is for effective value creation (free markets) and just society (equality of people).
Do some research. This is a very old strip that became popular a while back as a liberal response to conservative/libertarian positions on poverty/affirmative action/social welfare. I was assuming that someone would be aware of that but it seems that is not the case.
The approach towards equal opportunity differs radically depending upon religious/social/political belief. There are, of course, penumbras where opinions intersect, but that is the exception. It was no coincidence that Europe became atheist/secular and a welfare society at the same time. And it is no coincidence that the most religious societies in this world have some of the highest rates of inequality.