My proposal is not completely about failure of the talks and is more general:
1. Define Iran's role in the world, region etc etc, what we see as future of Iran? set a goal and go after it. that makes a huge different on our decisions.
2. Realizing that nuclear program doesn't have enough weight to deal with the regime of sanction and the fact that responses to the sanctions that are indeed economical in nature must be economical in nature not nuclear or at least a hybrid response is needed ,,,, also the subject of the talks can not be taken as the guarantee of implementation of the very same deal we negotiate esp when they could put back sanction with a stroke of pen while we need 6 months ... that's why American went banana after 2 years, the deal was over for them as they achieved their goal.
3. Accept the fact that whether talks succeed or not we need a heavy surgery on our economy, even with the best deal and removal of all sanctions it's a must.
4. IR needs to stay in the deal, put economical plans as conditions of the deal with digits not asking stupid demand of guarantee ..No contract or deal can be guaranteed the best assurance is our actions and vision ... for example deal must provide Iran with freedom of selling 5 million barrel oil per day no matter what happens otherwise it's a violation of deal that can be calculated and responded.
5. Is unlikely to see the talks fail as both sides are really after it by different goals , war ain't an option as an Iran nuclear armed ain't an option for them too ... so I think there will be a deal sooner or later what we see is just a war of will.
Western powers official policy since Bush administration has been zero enrichment in Iran, they have sought such a policy through terrorist attacks, assassination, sanctions, sabotage, espionage, even through their puppets in the region by lowering oil prices ... after 2 decades they just want Iran to not advance its program anymore for a period .. for sure Iran will do exactly what western superpowers dictate it but in a reverse way.
And on why Iran not developing nukes, how do you know? what we know is Iran has mastered all needed steps from delivery system to material and know-how ... making a bomb in one thing entering such a race in a another thing. being a nuclear threshold state would serve Iran's goal very well.
On Iran being bogyman, well as far as I know Saudis and Arabs in general had been buying a large amount of weapon even before 1979 Islamic revolution in Iran:
View attachment 816504
So instead of making such baseless claims try to figure out what is the role of Saudis in the region that despite all they've done westerns would not harm them. it started with as pawn in breaking up Islamic block and Ottomon empire.
