What role MOAB has Pakistan's Defence?

[AZADPAKISTAN2009]

I mean how is this even news ???
It's a fictional movie

These folks are preparing folks for some sort or false flag folks

I am sorry this is happening live on TV I am watching

 

[Philip the Arab]

any ideas as to what this is?

Nothing close to the power of a MOAB for sure.

 

[Dual Wielder]

Nuclear weapons would be used when defeat is certain if Pakistani forces couldn't stop Indian tanks then nasr would be used

Its still a lose-lose situation nuking your own territory?



@doorstar
definitely not a MOAB

 

[Philip the Arab]

I mean how is this even new ???
It's a fictional movie

These folks are preparing folks for some sort or false flag folks

Stop spamming pls.

 

[Ultima Thule]

It can fly with escorts, can't it? And the weapons are 1000 kg each so that is 3000kg plus fuel tanks and sidewinders.

Yes but it will conceal other fighters in the area @Philip the Arab

And CNN christine amanpoor stated just now

Lets watch this movie clip about terrorism from Pakistani Terrorist in India
some movie called hotel something

The afghan bitch is doing her thing

Talking about "Bollywood movie" ......

This is ridiculous

Kashmir is burning and this bitch ...is showing clips from bollywood movie on allegation

Stick to the topic sir this thread is not for Kashmir issue @AZADPAKISTAN2009

 

[faani83]

1. Important point is that It can give Pakistan psychological advantage. It would be easier to use without garnishing international attention. It can also wreck havoc on advance indian columns with an area of 5 Kms. Can also be used REPEATEDLY....perfect conventional reply without going nuclear.....!

 

[Philip the Arab]

Yes but it will conceal other fighters in the area @Philip the Arab


Stick to the topic sir this thread is not for Kashmir issue @AZADPAKISTAN2009

With REK integrated on MK84 it could be dropped behind LOC and hit bases up to 80 or some km away.

1. Important point is that It can give Pakistan psychological advantage. It would be easier to use without garnishing international attention. It can also wreck havoc on advance indian columns with an area of 5 Kms. Can also be used REPEATEDLY....perfect conventional reply without going nuclear.....!

India does have road mobile SAMs you know? A bomber would be an especially easy target for SAMs.

 

[AZADPAKISTAN2009]

What makes you think that kind of classified info will be available on this forum

 

[Ultima Thule]

It can fly with escorts, can't it? And the weapons are 1000 kg each so that is 3000kg plus fuel tanks and sidewinders.

total/max payload of 4500 kg, that make just over 8000 lbs and you are on above post referring to 3000 lbs that's makes 1300 kg per weapons and that make 3 LIGHT MOAB type weapons just over 4000 kg, plus 1500 kg 3 fuel drop tank @Philip the Arab

 

[Philip the Arab]

total/max payload of 4500 kg, that make just over 8000 lbs and you are on above post referring to 3000 lbs that's makes 1300 kg per weapons and that make 3 LIGHT MOAB type weapons just over 4000 kg, plus 1500 kg 3 fuel drop tank @Philip the Arab

No, I'm saying use MK84 2000 pound bomb with a thermobaric warhead which will increase TNT equivalent a few times from 300 kg of explosive equivalent to 1000kg.

 

[Ultima Thule]

With REK integrated on MK84 it could be dropped behind LOC and hit bases up to 80 or some km away

But MK-84 with rek kit doesn't effect Marching advancing enemy columns much @Philip the Arab

 

[Philip the Arab]

But MK-84 with rek kit doesn't effect Marching advancing enemy columns much @Philip the Arab

If you really want to affect advancing columns use cluster munitions like DPICM artillery, and DPICM 122mm grad rockets. Egypt and China both have great rockets for anti-tank and vehicle usages.

 

[Ultima Thule]

Don't twist you're argument, on the first page you assume JF-17 can carry 3 3000 lbs bombs @Philip the Arab

No, I'm saying use MK84 2000 pound bomb with a thermobaric warhead which will increase TNT equivalent a few times from 300 kg of explosive equivalent to 1000kg.

 

[Philip the Arab]

Don't twist you're argument, on the first page you assume JF-17 can carry 3 3000 lbs bombs @Philip the Arab

No, I didn't I said MK84 explicitly which is a two thousand pound bomb. The equivalent of the explosion if using a thermobaric will be equivalent to a 3000 pound bomb going of.
Look at Russian FOAB and how it gives off a bigger reaction in terms of TNT than MOAB but is smaller because of Thermobaric mix.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Father_of_All_Bombs

 

[Philip the Arab]

no

Nasr
Mass 1200 kg
Warhead 400 kg conventional high explosive, cluster munition or plutonium or uranium tactical nuclear weapon

Blast yield: 0.5 to 5 kilotons
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_artillery
.............................................................
NATO used a version of it in Iraq

I think you mean they used depleted uranium shells which don't give off a nuclear reaction.