what is keeping pakistan together???

[MZ-PDF]

Armed forces.

 

[El Sidd]

The title means that pakistan is not a natural nation and you needn some force to keep it to gather and when that force shall become week, Pakistan shall disintegrate.

Pakistan has gained territory since the OP Prasad Sahab.....

Facts are against you here.

Armed forces.

Are they foreign in nature?

 

[HariPrasad]

Pakistan has gained territory since the OP Prasad Sahab.....

Facts are against you here.



Are they foreign in nature?

Loosing BD is gaing territory

 

[El Sidd]

Loosing BD is gaing territory

Appendage....

We are Not in 1971

 

[HariPrasad]

Pl

Appendage....

We are Not in 1971

What is op sir?

 

[El Sidd]

Pl

What is op sir?

Original post

 

[HariPrasad]

Original post

OhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhOhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

 

[Indus Pakistan]

Are they foreign in nature?

Yes. The seed was planted from outside and when it was a strong sapling Pakistan inheritated it.

@HariPrasad What is keeping Pakistan together is exactly the same as what is keeping India together. British era institutional, administrative, military structures supported by economic inertia. For instance these same factors made kept the vast sub-continent together in various degrees under the British Raj for almost 200 years to it's demise in 1947. India and Pakistan have barely notched 70 years thus far.

If a foreign people from across the side of the globe kept the entire sub-continent together for nearly 200 years what is the big cheaps in native elites keeping India, Pakistan together when all they have do is manage the ready made British era admin/military/institutional structures which in your case even extends to chilling in a British built capital (New Delhi) city along with British built administrative buildings???

All Indian elites have to do is drive the darned British built rickshaw without crashing and occasionally servicing the damn thing.

 

[HariPrasad]

Yes. The seed was planted from outside even when it was a strong sapling Pakistan inheritated it.

@HariPrasad What is keeping Pakistan together is exactly the same as what is keeping India together. British era institutional, administrative, military structures supported by economic inertia. For instance these same factors made and kept the vast sub-continent together in various degrees under the British Raj for almost 200 years to it's demise in 1947. India and Pakistan have barely notched 70 years thus far.

If a foreign people from across the side of the globe to keep the entire sub-continent together for nearly 200 years what is the big cheaps in native elites keeping India, Pakistan together when all they have do is manage the ready made British era admin/military/institutional structures which in your case even extends to chilling in a British built capital city along with British built administrative buildings???

No, when we had many kingdoms, we had an identity as a nation called bharatvarsha. We are a natural country with or without central ruling authority. Pakistan was a totally new concept floated few years before 1947. It met its natural end in 1971 and you very well about remaining part. Pl do not compare it with india. There is no logic in vomparing the two.

 

[Indus Pakistan]

your case even extends to chilling in a British built capital (New Delhi) city along with British built administrative buildings???

In case of Pakistan our ruling elites got everything Indian ruling elites got but minus -

• A British built shiny new city along with impressive administrative buildings - New Delhi in 1920s. So our elite built themselves a new capital city in 1960s - Islamabad.

• A British constructed brand called "India". Our elite have been struggling to build up a brand and thus far it is all things to all men - rather similiar to Hinduism.

bharatvarsha

Clap fckin trap. No such shite existed. Your reifying something today that never existed. That "Bharatvaganga" whatever is directly equivalent to the 'Ummah' crap we have. Delusions beig spun as historical facts.

 

[Kabira]

No, when we had many kingdoms, we had an identity as a nation called bharatvarsha. We are a natural country with or without central ruling authority. Pakistan was a totally new concept floated few years before 1947. It met its natural end in 1971 and you very well about remaining part. Pl do not compare it with india. There is no logic in vomparing the two.

India is largely homogeneous country if one removes punjab and Kashmir from it. As long as these are part of India it cannot be natural in any sense.

 

[PurpleStone]

Hatred for India.

 

[Indus Pakistan]

India is largely homogeneous

Ball oxe. Eve seen Tamils or other Dravids, then seen Bangla from Kolkata or Upites???

 

[Jaanbaz]

Love for beef.

 

[HamWatan]

Darpoke tareen dushman.