What's new

What is Iran's response on the recent events in Kashmir?

.
What was Pakistan's response when US was threatening Iran? You reap what you sow.
Pakistan dont "pretend" to be the savior of islam unlike khomeini .

Did you have your head in the ground? Pakistan stated clearly that it was against any sort of conflict with Iran. If you dont like where you live then pack your bags and move to Iran. Lest see how they treat you there.
shah se ziyada shah k wafadar . mir jafar ki nasal
 
Last edited:
.
Students protest in front of the Indian embassy in Tehran, in solidarity with the people of #Kashmir



EBcCNp4XoAITBY7.jpg


EBcCNpzXUAUwqxw.jpg


EBcCNp6XUAA-UDN.jpg


EBcCNp6XsAAlU4y.jpg
 
.
First of all the concept of Muslim brotherhood is from our Prophet (S.A.W) and secondly Pakistan was made for the Muslims of Subcontinent If Quaid e Azam had the same opinion about Ummah as yours there wouldnt be any partition.

Pakistan and the so called subcontinent are separate ideologies, and should not be mixed.

The subcontinent theory considers Pakistan and India to be linked, which is completely false because Pakistan's history and basis for nationhood is completely distinct from the modern country of India. If the subcontinent theory was correct, then modern Indians coming to Islam would make us one nation, which is a fools' concept and already proven wrong by the creation of Bangladesh.

The notion of muslims being the basis of the new state of Pakistan was the political reality of conditions on the ground, where ethnicity could not be easily used due to language and Pakistan's perceived multi ethnic identity, which is it self a British legal conception, as the Muslims of Punjab, Sindh, Baluchistan, Kashmir and indeed all of Afghan lands did not historically see each other as ethnically different, but only culturally. Of course, Indian origin Muslims were welcome to be part of this new nation, but were never the basis of it.

Punjab is probably the best example of this reality, where an even remotely ethnic identity simply does not exist.
 
Last edited:
. .
Last edited:
. . .
Are they ethnic Pakistanis?

I say no, and scientific facts agree with me.
Pakistani just means Pashto, Afghan, and Kashmiri which they could definitely all be part of. As I said I'm a lightskin Arab that is just a bit darker or at the same shade as many Italians and Mediterranean people.
 
. .
Pakistani just means Pashto, Afghan, and Kashmiri which they could definitely all be part of. As I said I'm a lightskin Arab that is just a bit darker or at the same shade as many Italians and Mediterranean people.

So what do you want a "nobel prize" for having lighter skin on the same scale as Italians? What an achievement :lol:.
 
.
Pakistani just means Pashto, Afghan, and Kashmiri which they could definitely all be part of. As I said I'm a lightskin Arab that is just a bit darker or at the same shade as many Italians and Mediterranean people.


Ok whats the deal why you got Ladyboy land flags eh
 
. .
This poster from Kashmir ...in the background Pakistani flag not Iranian flag.

1.7545016.3475561696.PNG


At the end of day, Pakistani has to fight this war. No one will come to help. Every country has there own economic interest. Saudi,UAE or Iran they have huge economic interest in India. Well all these countries can be in Pakistani pocket if we exceed our trade from Indians..... Think wisely ....the era of ummah and emotionalism is over. Every nation protect its national interest.
 
. .

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom