What's new

what does the Pak armed forces realiticially need to counter india conventially

Hi,

what you Indians don't realize that we are not concerned with your 7 or 10 times----what our concern is to hold you for 72 hours---if we can---then we will smash thru----.

Your navy does not bother us a tad bit-----it is actually the least of our worries----.

See---we also have our version of cold star doctrine----. And our assessment is that we can strike hard and cut off major land area-----but our concern is that is india going to go nuclear----?

In our geographical situation---the cold start doctrine suits our purpose and vision and operation better than yours---.

The thing is that our sole purpose in life is to fight you and conquer you----your sole purpose in life is tomake money----so you cannot keep on with us----.

And again---you money expenditure does not bother us a tad bit----because most of it is wasted----and then there are other issues as well.

Truth be told---how many Indians get up everyday and say we want to destroy and conquer Pakistan---not many---but how about Pakistan----!!!! Think about it---. That is all we think---from dawn till dusk----.

You guys ought to be grateful to your leaders that you got the nucs----otherwise---you would have seen our cold start doctrine as well by now---.

As I said India is not interested in a war. We think development and has more to loose unlike you who always dream of destroying India and has nothing to loose. But in spite I doubt you have the guts to take on India, if you would have had, there would have been an war already.

But one thing for sure a no war and no peace situation suits India, as it will keep Pakistan in perpetual internal turmoil. An underdeveloped, terrorist infested and backward Pakistan suits India.
 
.
As I said India is not interested in a war. We think development and has more to loose unlike you who always dream of destroying India and has nothing to loose. But in spite I doubt you have the guts to take on India, if you would have had, there would have been an war already.

But one thing for sure a no war and no peace situation suits India, as it will keep Pakistan in perpetual internal turmoil. An underdeveloped, terrorist infested and backward Pakistan suits India.

Hi,

My man---you are young---so you may not have been told---once Pakistan gets shiny new weapons---it is time for war---when we will start it---it is at our discretion. We are just filling up our coffers.
 
.
Hi,

My man---you are young---so you may not have been told---once Pakistan gets shiny new weapons---it is time for war---when we will start it---it is at our discretion. We are just filling up our coffers.

military machines are propped by economic might. India has the $$$ to expand its military strength at short notice in a dramatic manner.
 
.
Hi,

My man---you are young---so you may not have been told---once Pakistan gets shiny new weapons---it is time for war---when we will start it---it is at our discretion. We are just filling up our coffers.

Good luck to you...but as I said a no war and no peace situation favors India. And the present situation is a no war and no peace one and I don't see any chances of serious Indo-Pak dialogue in next 10 years.
 
. . . .
military machines are propped by economic might. India has the $$$ to expand its military strength at short notice in a dramatic manner.

Hi,

Okay --- so what---. When we want to come and get you---we will. That is the bottom line.
 
.
it looks like i touched someone's nerves
Einstein: There are two limitless things in Universe. Universe itself and Man stupidness, and I doubt about first case.

Of course you annoyed me, every one has a certain tolerance level to bear stupidness and naiveness.........

Hi,

Okay --- so what---. When we want to come and get you---we will. That is the bottom line.

Sir it's Moral vs Money...... And every one knows who will win........
 
.
in theory if Pakistan did not support Mumbai style terrorist attacks you would not have to worry about fighting the Indian military

Hi,

I guess most of you Indians are missing something---and it dawned on me just now---I think that you guys think that we are ill equipped to fight you and we will get beat up and that is why we worry----.

Actually the core of our discussion is that we are ill equipped to smash you guys to a pulp----that is the crux of our agreements and disagreements over here is----that we have not enough weapons to really break you down----.

Our problem is that we have enough to hold you down for the war----but not put you down for all.

If it was not for your nuclear weapons there would have been some interesting things happening by now----.
 
.
Hi,

Okay --- so what---. When we want to come and get you---we will. That is the bottom line.
images
 
. .
Hi,

I guess most of you Indians are missing something---and it dawned on me just now---I think that you guys think that we are ill equipped to fight you and we will get beat up and that is why we worry----.

Actually the core of our discussion is that we are ill equipped to smash you guys to a pulp----that is the crux of our agreements and disagreements over here is----that we have not enough weapons to really break you down----.

Our problem is that we have enough to hold you down for the war----but not put you down for all.

If it was not for your nuclear weapons there would have been some interesting things happening by now----.
salam mastan saheb i really dont like to interfear when pakistanies talk like that :D

but looks like your account is hacked is it :azn:

thing is its not about the capabilty you lack its about the commitment and conviction that your armed forces lack but then again .... cheers & happy diwali to you and your family sirji :coffee:
 
.
Why is that---is your dad or your uncles---older brothers and grandfathers etc or your family looting and plundering the resources of Pakistan---and you don't want anyone to interfere---is that the reason!

No. The armed forces should defend the border. The plunder of resources would be less if we had regular elections and the people would have rejected corrupt politicans.

Army should also not perform the policing in cities, infra structure development, disaster management, flood releif as well but thats happening because of our failed politicians and institutions.

Nobody is perfect. Even the the army made mistake by supporting barbaric Talibans which caused weponization of our society. Pakistani Talibans and other terrorist groups rose under the patronage of Pakistan Army and then went bezerk and attacked Pakistanis.
 
.
1. An Army thats under Pakistan and not a Pakistan under the Army

2. A good economy

3. A good political leadership

4. Industrial base and infrastructure
1: Pakistan has done best under Army rule
2: Economy isnt doing bad; now that Karachi is tame, Terrorism almost gone and CPEC underway; Pakistan's economy in the future seems bright.
3: Can be solved with martial law
4: Pakistan has very good infrastructure.

Operation Parakram only aimed at mobilizing troops in short time which at that time gave a physiological fear to Musharraf who then agreed to freez the terror funding.

What you want us to enter in a war and ruin our economy just because of a usual terror strikes from pakistan!! Remember the costs of 71 you had to pay when India was prepared for war
Operation Parakram resulted in around 2000 Casualties for Indians trying to get to the border; Musharraf had no fear and responded by Mobilizing his forces; by the time half of India's army was mobilized, Pakistan was already dug in and awaiting orders. Pakistan Army decided to say there until Indians went home; and thats what exactly happend. Musharraf proved India twice that India is all talk and nothing else. 1971 was already a lost war, India came in late and took the credit for it.

Hi,

I guess most of you Indians are missing something---and it dawned on me just now---I think that you guys think that we are ill equipped to fight you and we will get beat up and that is why we worry----.

Actually the core of our discussion is that we are ill equipped to smash you guys to a pulp----that is the crux of our agreements and disagreements over here is----that we have not enough weapons to really break you down----.

Our problem is that we have enough to hold you down for the war----but not put you down for all.

If it was not for your nuclear weapons there would have been some interesting things happening by now----.
Pakistan has the qualitative edge but completely lacks in quantity.

Where did you see me denying or where did you see India Denying that??? Its Pakistan who hides Its forces deaths... be it in Cross border attacks or war.

Stop calling all Indians as hindus. 71!!!??? you people really need to learn the International version of history instead of your Military controlled Histories in the first place kid... its called propaganda. In 48 we successfully stopped you from Invading Kashmir.. you created a mess and ruined the lives of Kahmiris but now you want to act as a savior.. WTF..

Again in 65 you people smugged terrorosts and regular soldiers in civilian cloths (All hail the professionalism of Pakistan Military) and attacked Kahmir surprisingly.. but finally ened up saving lahore. let me not talk about the time when we cut of your country in 71.. again we gave you a hard slap in 85 and 99 we buried your own soldiers when your own military brass refused get their bodies (Highly professional of Him)

Ya you didn't lose in 71.. hell ya no one on earth can defeat Pakistan @@@

Kid.. we don't consider pakistan anymore threat as before.. ow our focus is China not you.. you're not worth. don't try to get any attention by nukes..
:omghaha: In 1948 Pakistan Army captured Azad Kashmir which was the most fortified and entrenched belt of Area in Kashmir. The Commander of Pakistan army of that time was British and refused to advance any further than Azad Kashmir. The Gilgit Scouts and irregular Pasthun militia took half of Kashmir without the help of Pakistan Army against the combined forces of numerically and technologically superior Dogra Regime and Indian Army. Bhai Jaan, i'm Kashmiri and trust me; if Pakistan ruined the lives of Kashmiris then we would've been demanding independence from Pakistan. Just compare Pakistan's Kashmir with Indian occupied Kashmir.

Pashtun Militias them selves went to Kashmir and were not in any way supported by the Pakistan Army in the early phase; Indian retaliated by attacking Pakistan Army. Lahore was never expected to be attacked and was only defended by a halved garrison force; you should kill your self from shame to the fact that a halved Garrison force fended off a full blown Indian invasion. Once the Invasion was defeated, a counter attack made up of reinforcements from Sindh and west Punjab was advancing towards the Indian border; had there not been a peace treaty, the counter-attack would've taken Indian Punjab. Not to mention that our Air Force had a kill ratio of 1:10.

What happened in 85? and who told you we refused bodies...? :cuckoo:

Hell, you guys are trying to ignore us? Go on youtube and type in Pakistan, Indians are straight up obsessed while we really consider you as nothing but pests.
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom