What Assad should do in his 3rd term as president

[SALMAN F]

Another failed propaganda video try next time

 

[Yzd Khalifa]

Another failed propaganda video try next time

Everything is a propaganda except what you believe in

 

[SALMAN F]

Everything is a propaganda except what you believe in

Yea specialy from Zionist jaish al kir group

 

[Superboy]

resign and hand himself over to the international court.

What court is that?

 

[That Guy]

What court is that?

international court of justice....

 

[Superboy]

international court of justice....

Out of the 190+ countries, only 3 have real power: the US, Russia, China. All the others are only fo sho Surely, there is no international court

 

[Syrian Lion]

international court of justice....

Alasad shall turn himself in, when that court of justice start practicing justice against the west's criminals, starting from the WWII bombing of Japan... that court needs to show it is about justice when it starts flexing its muscles on the real criminals...

 

[Falcon29]

Yea specialy from Zionist jaish al kir group

If they're so Zionist why don't you guys let them take over Syria so you can prove it to the world?

 

[That Guy]

Alasad shall turn himself in, when that court of justice start practicing justice against the west's criminals, starting from the WWII bombing of Japan... that court needs to show it is about justice when it starts flexing its muscles on the real criminals...

Yeah, you realize that your statement doesn't make much sense here, does it? Do you even know when the UN was established? If you did, you wouldn't have said that.

Out of the 190+ countries, only 3 have real power: the US, Russia, China. All the others are only fo sho Surely, there is no international court

Yeah, except the US isn't a member of the court, and has little to no influence over it's decisions. In fact, the US was even declared a terrorist sponsoring organization a long time ago, by the international courts.

As for global power, I think you need to brush up on your geopolitics.

 

[Syrian Lion]

Yeah, you realize that your statement doesn't make much sense here, does it? Do you even know when the UN was established? If you did, you wouldn't have said that.

why it doesn't make sense? we can't take criminals to court because the law was established after their crimes... okay forget WWII, what about Iraq? Vietnam? Korea? and all the wars the west started and killed millions of people....

 

[That Guy]

why it doesn't make sense? we can't take criminals to court because the law was established after their crimes... okay forget WWII, what about Iraq? Vietnam? Korea? and all the wars the west started and killed millions of people....

Well, for one thing, the court's jurisdiction only extends to those that are signatories. The last I checked, Syria was and the US wasn't.

 

[Syrian Lion]

Well, for one thing, the court's jurisdiction only extends to those that are signatories. The last I checked, Syria was and the US wasn't.

then why are you saying Alasad should to go the "international court of Justice" , alright what about UK, France and etc??? they also committed war crimes in Iraq Afghanistan and etc...

 

[That Guy]

then why are you saying Alasad should to go the "international court of Justice" , alright what about UK, France and etc??? they also committed war crimes in Iraq Afghanistan and etc...

Actually, I knew you would say that. First I'd like to say that the US was already prosecuted by international courts a long time ago. Next, UK and France generally have either gotten permission, or in case of Iraq, the Iraqi government hasn't filed a case against the UK.

The ICJ can't just go off on it's own without the victim charging the accused.

 

[Syrian Lion]

Actually, I knew you would say that. First I'd like to say that the US was already prosecuted by international courts a long time ago. Next, UK and France generally have either gotten permission, or in case of Iraq, the Iraqi government hasn't filed a case against the UK.

The ICJ can't just go off on it's own without the victim charging the accused.

that doesn't make sense, why are you trying to defend a failed system such as IJC, the ICJ was legit, it would have started with the western criminals... and I don't understand that, so if a guy killed a person, how is that dead person going to file a case??

 

[That Guy]

that doesn't make sense, why are you trying to defend a failed system such as IJC, the ICJ was legit, it would have started with the western criminals... and I don't understand that, so if a guy killed a person, how is that dead person going to file a case??

It makes perfect sense if you know how the courts work. The ICJ isn't a regular court, it handles cases between nations, so it cannot (by definition) be compared to a regular national court of nation country, it's a fallacy to do so.

A victim nation is not a person, if a person in the nation dies, the nation will still exist. Iraq, if it wanted to, can file a case against the US and the UK, hell, a regular Iraqi could, but most people don't know this, so nothing like this happens.

I suggest you actually read about the courts before passing judgement on them, as they've been quite effective, even if they have their flaws.