what does your history tells you?
i will tell u the lies that i hate the most about afghanis .
1 the first stupid attempt they do is that go on the internet and any khan that is present in pakistan and has done something exceptional ..they change the wiki articles and write that they were afghanis about 400 years ago and the common city that they add is herat(i,e there great grandfather went from here as if they knew his great grandfather). second have u read that stupid book afghan bolly roots where it says that salman khan aamir khan great great grandad came from herat and that is a guy who according to them went to india to talk to all these khans.. khan is not an afghani surname only ..
2 i have heard alot from these afghanis that chengez khan when invaded the area which is now afghanistan he wrote a letter to his grandmom that over here everybody is chengez khan..wtf,, chengez khan was the bravest king of his era and the kingof this area was sultan iltutmish who was so afraid of chengez khan that he refused to help another muslim king who belonged to khawarizm empire, then how come they make up **** like chengez khan wrote a letter .......now also i was scrolling through alexander the great on this forum and i foudn the same **** written about him that when he came to this area he said afghans were all alexanders..again wtf.. at that time there was no afghanistna and no afghans.. there were persians ruling this area.. how come he could have said that , another lie from afghhanis ..and if it is written somewhere its written by these afghani scholars
3 they say that afghans have ruled india pakistan ?? well start from the frist century persians ruled there country then kabul shahis who were janjua rajput hindus who ruled their country for 6 centuries and they are the ancestors of this afghanis .. then
muhammad ghaznwi according to them an afghan ,...but he was a turk by ruling any area doesnt make him afghan or pakistani or indian .
mohammad of ghor or ghaurid dynasty was shansbani persian king .. even stupid afghanis have called him afghan but their proves have been debunked
all delhi sultante was turk ..
only small 70 year perido of lodhis and 5 year afghan suri came whose ancestors were turks too..this was only afghan..
mughal were turk mongol.. khiljis accordong to them were also afghan but living in that area doesnt mean that they were turks as told by the historian of that time ...
ahmed shah was the servant of nadir shah who was a turk again.. ahmed shah rulled for may be 50 years i guess he came and made afghanistan in 1760 .. 1800 sikhs ruled for 50 years (these afghans woudl have made them afghans too if they were muslims.).
then british came and in 1893 the afghanistan king gave kpk to british and they say they never lost a war against britishers
so the moral of the story is that u afghans have been ruled by hindus, turks and persians in the same way as we have been .. i study history i m nt like stupid afghanis who just consider everybody from their land to be afghan.. they were ruled by turls [ersians , mongols, hindus kabul shhai
prove me wrong any afghani out here .. stop claiming that u were some superior people u were ruled in the sme manner as we were ..
