What's new

Western democracy has failed in Pakistan: Hashwani

INDIAPOSITIVE

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Sep 20, 2014
Messages
9,318
Reaction score
-28
Country
India
Location
India
Supports Islamic system; seeks privatisation of govt entities

ISLAMABAD: Eminent entrepreneur Sadruddin Hashwani has said that the Westminster Parliamentary System of Britain had failed in Pakistan and it is not feasible to continue with it. He also quoted a verse from the Holy Quran in this regard.

In a special talk with this correspondent, Hashwani said that Pakistan should not implement the concept of Western democracy and added that it should follow the Islamic political system.

He further said that if 50 states could be formed in the US, the government should also form administrative units within the four provinces. He suggested that new provinces should be constituted in the country purely on administrative basis through new amendments other than the 18th Amendment.

He opined that formation of several provinces would improve the governance. He said that employment should not be given on the basis of rural and urban quota but on merit.

Hashwani proposed that president (Ameer) of Pakistan should be elected directly by the people, whereas the chief ministers should also be elected by the voters from the respective provinces. The provincial assembly should range from 25 to 50 members. He claimed that the people could get inexpensive justice when their own representatives elected directly by themselves would resolve their problems.

He cited the example of the US where the president and the assemblies are elected through direct vote He said that the Islamic political system did not resemble dictatorship and it dispensed justice to the people, resolved their problems on merit, strengthened the education sector and judiciary. He remarked that such a political system would change the fate of Karachi.

The businessman said that if China invested in Pakistan by facilitating 13 power projects, it would be a good omen for the Pakistanis, as it would lessen electricity loadshedding, which would be beneficial for the industries, agriculture, domestic and commercial consumers, and would increase national production and exports.

To a question, he said that the power cuts could be avoided by installing solar power panels. Factories for manufacturing solar panels were functional in India, Bangladesh, China, Germany, Australia and other countries.

Hashwani said that an investor-friendly petroleum policy should be introduced to attract investment of national and multi-national companies.

He proposed privatisation of distribution companies, the organisations under the Ministry of Petroleum, Pakistan International Airlines, Pakistan Railways, Pakistan Steel and other production-oriented organisations which were causing a loss of billions of rupees to the national kitty. He said that Pakistan had abundance of petroleum and gas resources.

He noted that if the petroleum policy made by the bureaucrats did not give way to national and global firms, they should know what return these firms would get after exploring natural resources by spending billions of rupees. He said that the bureaucrats should perform their official responsibilities and not do business. He said that Zulfikar Ali Bhutto destroyed the national economy by nationalisation of the institutions. He said that if the judicial commission confirmed extensive rigging in the May 2013 general elections, re-elections should be held.
- See more at: Western democracy has failed in Pakistan: Hashwani - thenews.com.pk
 
. .
Hashwani proposed that president (Ameer) of Pakistan

this "ameer" term is a tableeghi jamaat term... is hashwani a mullah lover??

Supports Islamic system; seeks privatisation of govt entities

1. what does he mean by "islamic system"... the islam of libyan jamahiriya or the "islam" of iran/saudia/talibania??

2. privatisation?? what a foolish idea?? all essential things should be made public property and free... water, electricity, transport, gas, roads, houses etc... money system should be removed.

He cited the example of the US where the president and the assemblies are elected through direct vote

usa is not a real direct-democracy... usa is a capitalist dictatorship of two political parties...

a real direct-democracy was libyan jamahiriya with socialism as the supervisor.

pakistan should again look at what iqbal says...
 
. . . .
The changes he suggested will work even in westminister democracy. Ur problem is not style but execution.
 
. . .
this "ameer" term is a tableeghi jamaat term... is hashwani a mullah lover??



1. what does he mean by "islamic system"... the islam of libyan jamahiriya or the "islam" of iran/saudia/talibania??

2. privatisation?? what a foolish idea?? all essential things should be made public property and free... water, electricity, transport, gas, roads, houses etc... money system should be removed.



usa is not a real direct-democracy... usa is a capitalist dictatorship of two political parties...

a real direct-democracy was libyan jamahiriya with socialism as the supervisor.

pakistan should again look at what iqbal says...
The head of the state a Muslim nation should obviously be called the Ameer. The Islamic system had flourished till the Ottoman Caliphate disintegrated. Communist govts, socialist states and states who have adopted western democracy have/had various shades. Constrained with similar factors Muslim societies have/had various shades of political profile.
 
.
The head of the state a Muslim nation should obviously be called the Ameer.

1. what is your definition of "muslim state"??

2. "nation" and "nationalism" are against islam and modern socialism... there should not be division of humanity into races and countries... that is the natural state.

3. the use of "ameer" by tableeghi jamaat and the non-use by them of other terms is enough reason for us to not use that word... english language term is enough.

The Islamic system had flourished till the Ottoman Caliphate disintegrated.

the "ottoman empire" ( usmaniya empire ) was an empire... it neither was in accordance with islam nor it is with modern socialism ( real democracy )... if you look at all monarchies in the world presently, all are puppets/allies of usa government.

Communist govts, socialist states and states who have adopted western democracy have/had various shades. Constrained with similar factors Muslim societies have/had various shades of political profile.

i did not understand this.
 
.
It's easy to blame western democracy, or any democracy.

How about accepting that Pakistan is in danger of failing at democracy and not the other way round?
 
.
western-democracy-has-failed-in-pakistan


Then be part of ISIS Khilafat.. Accept Bagdadi as you Khalifa...
 
. .
how about india become a socialist society??


may be a good option :P

What I understand about democracy
a) it is worst form of govt, But there is no alternative to it.
b) it's like bunch of headless chickens, So there should be some one who has Veto power (in UK Queen has Veto, In USA President himself has Veto, In India Judiciary has Veto) (Joke: In Pakistan Mulla-Fauj Alliance has Veto)

What I mean by Veto: An holy authority which is respected by Public, which never directly interfere but when Public beg, they interfere. This authority is respected both by Govt and Public.

c) Democracy is self healing mechanism
d) Democracy need time.
e) every country should have there own flavor of democracy, there is no guarentee one form of democracy which is working in Nation A will work in Nation B. Democracy should evolve and customized to the need of nation..


Who ever agree with me, Give me like and who ever disagree reply..
 
.
Back
Top Bottom