What's new

'We will respond with all necessary measures': Russia issues chilling warning to America

Devil Soul

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
22,931
Reaction score
45
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
'We will respond with all necessary measures': Russia issues chilling warning to America days after its fighter jets buzzed US Navy warship on NATO exercise in the Baltic Sea just 70 miles from Kaliningrad
  • Russian SU-24 attack planes made numerous close-range passes by the guided-missile destroyer USS Donald Cook last week
  • The US has said USS Cook was on routine business near Poland in the Baltic Sea when it was harassed by Russian jets
  • Russia has now accused the US of intimidation for sailing it near them
  • Moscow's ambassador to NATO said the April 11 incident showed there could be no improvement in ties until US withdrew from Russia's borders
  • Alexander Grushko said: 'We will take all necessary measures, precautions, to compensate for these attempts to use military force'
  • See more news on the Russian military at www.dailymail.co.uk/russia
By REGINA F. GRAHAM FOR DAILYMAIL.COM and REUTERS

PUBLISHED: 16:07 GMT, 20 April 2016 | UPDATED: 06:16 GMT, 21 April 2016

Russia accused the United States on Wednesday of intimidation by sailing a US naval destroyer close to Russia's border in the Baltics and warned that the Russian military would respond with 'all necessary measures' to any future incidents.

Speaking after a meeting between NATO envoys and Russia, their first in almost two years, Moscow's ambassador to NATO said the April 11 maritime incident showed there could be no improvement in ties until the US-led alliance withdrew from Russia's borders.

'This is about attempts to exercise military pressure on Russia,' the envoy, Alexander Grushko, said.

'We will take all necessary measures, precautions, to compensate for these attempts to use military force.'

Scroll down for video

3325F85100000578-3550181-image-a-89_1461183608103.jpg



+8
Russia accused the United States on Wednesday of intimidation by sailing a US naval destroyer close to Russia's border in the Baltics. Above two Russian planes fly over USS Donald Cook April 12 in the Baltic Sea

335DD45300000578-3550181-image-a-88_1461183589505.jpg



+8
Russia Moscow's ambassador to NATO Alexander Grushkos (above) said the maritime incident showed there could be no improvement in ties until the US-led alliance withdrew from Russia's borders

335DE71D00000578-3550181-image-a-90_1461183778748.jpg



+8
Grushkos said: 'This is about attempts to exercise military pressure on Russia. We will take all necessary measures, precautions, to compensate for these attempts to use military force'

US Ambassador to NATO Douglas Lute pressed Russia about the incident, warning it had been dangerous.

The United States has said the guided missile destroyer USS Cook was on routine business near Poland when it was harassed by Russian jets.

'We were in international waters,' a NATO diplomat reported Lute as telling Grushko during the NATO-Russia council meeting.

Last week Secretary of State John Kerry said the Navy ship could have opened fire on the Russian military jets that buzzed around it.

Kerry made the statement in remarks to CNN Espanol in Miami and condemned Russia's actions.

He said that 'under the rules of engagement (it) could have been a shoot-down'.


Despite what officials said was a calm and professional meeting, the public comments highlighted the state of tension that persists between the sides since Moscow's annexation of Ukraine's Crimea in March 2014 and its support for separatist rebels in eastern Ukraine.

33261E5700000578-3550181-The_United_States_has_said_the_guided_missile_destroyer_USS_Cook-m-93_1461183843318.jpg



+8
The United States has said the guided missile destroyer USS Cook was on routine business near Poland when it was harassed by Russian jets. Above a Russian helicopter flies low near USS Cook in the Baltic Sea April 12

3325F9BF00000578-3550181-image-a-94_1461183945679.jpg



+8
A NATO diplomat reported US Ambassador to NATO Douglas Lute telling Grushko during the NATO-Russia council meeting that 'We were in international waters.' Above a Russian aircraft flies near the USS Cook

'We have to use our lines of communication,' he said.

Russia's chief concern is NATO's biggest modernization since the Cold War, which is likely to include a military build-up in eastern Europe with a rotating, multinational force in Poland and the Baltics.

NATO says the plans are a proportionate response to Russian aggression following Moscow's annexation of Crimea, and the alliance had no forces in eastern Europe before the Ukraine crisis.

Poland and other NATO members in the Baltics worry about an increase in the Russian military presence in its Kaliningrad enclave, where Russia is positioning longer-range surface-to-air missiles.


335DE94D00000578-3550181-image-a-91_1461183809949.jpg



+8
NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg (above) suggested revamping a Cold War-era treaty known as the Vienna document

3351A32E00000578-3550181-image-a-95_1461184117719.jpg



+8
The Vienna document sets out the rules for large-scale exercises and other military activity, as well as telephone hotlines and other military communication channels. Stoltenberg said: 'We have to use our lines of communication'

The session of the NATO-Russia Council, which last met in June 2014, had been called in part to assuage Russia's concerns that it feels threatened by NATO. But core differences clearly remained afterwards.

NATO envoys had expressed concern about Russia's so-called snap exercises, where thousands of Russian troops carry out war games without any prior warning. 'That is clearly destabilizing,' a NATO diplomat said.

Stoltenberg said NATO members had rejected Grushko's description of the crisis in eastern Ukraine as a civil war.

'In the meeting, it was re-confirmed that we disagree on the facts, on the narrative and the responsibilities in and around Ukraine,' Stoltenberg said after the meeting.

'Many allies disagree when Russia tries to portray this as a civil war.

This is Russia destabilizing eastern Ukraine, providing support for the separatists, munitions, funding, equipment and also command and control,' he said.

'So there were profound disagreements,' he said.

Russia denies any direct involvement in eastern Ukraine.

332644C000000578-3540893-The_USS_Cook_was_70_miles_marked_by_dotted_line_from_the_Russian-a-16_1460704043361.jpg



+8
The USS Cook was 70 miles (marked by dotted line) from the Russian enclave of Kaliningrad. Its exact location has not been released



Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...nt-NATO-tensions-laid-bare.html#ixzz46RttGYYV
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
 
Was Ukraine not part of Russia ? I Clearly remember a time when Ukraine was in Russia not long ago

I think some time after economical crisis in Soviet Union, Ukraine moved away from Russia however the economic sense for the move have not been very clear as most of the oil went with Russia


If Ukraine becomes Russia's new state they can may be get 80% discount on oil and gas
it will move their economy. New jobs in region for citizens of Ukraine

Sine 90's Ukraine has not developed its own Industry or Unique Identity in term of Industry (if anyone can prove otherwise please share)

It makes logical sense for people of Ukraine why fight when you can get cheap oil and gas , and economic benefits


Russia , obviously is peaceful nation but is being pressured on international arena etc and their stance is reasonable

1) Ban on Russian Athletes is illegal
2) Sherapova is innocent
3) MISSILES around Europe are direct threat to Russia
4) During Russian Winter Olympics weather weapon was used to cause excessive hot weather
5) Most of Russian trade partners have been bombarded or faced Terrorism

_88607754_maria_sharapova.jpg


Enough is enough

Time to remove ban on all honest Russian athletes

149583200-team-russia-anastasia-grishina-victoria-gettyimages.jpg


1344110655_RTR35YJD.jpg



OwW3sxAlaplgCQ5M


dimitry-klokov-1.jpg

The Olympic and sports bodies should also apologies to ban all wonderful athletes from Russia


Lot of encouragement to Russia in their difficult time hope the weapons close to their borders are immediately removed
 
Last edited:
'We will respond with all necessary measures': Russia issues chilling warning to America days after its fighter jets buzzed US Navy warship on NATO exercise in the Baltic Sea just 70 miles from Kaliningrad
  • Russian SU-24 attack planes made numerous close-range passes by the guided-missile destroyer USS Donald Cook last week
  • The US has said USS Cook was on routine business near Poland in the Baltic Sea when it was harassed by Russian jets
  • Russia has now accused the US of intimidation for sailing it near them
  • Moscow's ambassador to NATO said the April 11 incident showed there could be no improvement in ties until US withdrew from Russia's borders
  • Alexander Grushko said: 'We will take all necessary measures, precautions, to compensate for these attempts to use military force'
  • See more news on the Russian military at www.dailymail.co.uk/russia

332644C000000578-3540893-The_USS_Cook_was_70_miles_marked_by_dotted_line_from_the_Russian-a-16_1460704043361.jpg



+8
The USS Cook was 70 miles (marked by dotted line) from the Russian enclave of Kaliningrad. Its exact location has not been released



Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...nt-NATO-tensions-laid-bare.html#ixzz46RttGYYV
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
20120507123340%21Baltic_Sea_map.png


This is the Baltic Sea. Russia has coastline near St. Petersburg and Kaliningrad Oblast only. Total shore length is 18,000 km. The Baltic Sea is 1601 km tall and 193km wide at the longest point of distance. Territorial waters extend 12 nmi = 22 km out to sea from shore. Beyond are international waters and airways.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baltic_Sea

Russia owns only 7 % of the coast of the Baltic Sea. The length of the shoreline of the Russian part of the Gulf of Finland is 820 km (without island’s coasts), of which 350 km are the Northern coast which is heavily indented by fjords and skerries fringe forming numerous gulfs divided by belts. The length of the shoreline within Kaliningrad region is 145 km including Sambiyskiy peninsula (71 km), Curonian (49 km) and Visla (25 km) spits.
http://www.ccb.se/documents/Nationalreport_RUSSIA.pdf.

From the town of Kaliningrad to the Polish (NATO) port of Gdansk is 118 km.
http://www.worldatlas.com/travelaids/flight_distance.htm

Russian EEZ in the Baltic (in red)
IEG-Gulf.jpg

https://www.zin.ru/projects/ieg/area.htm

Sailing 70nmi (130km) from Kaliningrad takes on whole a different meaning when you consider that for the Baltic Sea: Max. width = 193 km (120 mi, 104 nmi)

The straight line distance from Kaliningrad to Gdansk in Poland is: 118 km (73 mi , 64 nmi). So, when leaving that port, of nearby Gdynia, (126 km to Kaliningrad), a navy ship would already be closer to the city of Kaliningrad than this ship was. In short: pretty ridiculous.

Even if it were 70km instead of mi or even nmi, it would be silly. Territorial waters are 12 nmi = 22 km.

See also https://defence.pk/threads/aggressi...in-15m-of-us-plane.427312/page-2#post-8258801

Shipping lanes in the Baltic Sea
thumb_65350_article_normal.jpeg


332644C000000578-3540893-The_USS_Cook_was_70_miles_marked_by_dotted_line_from_the_Russian-a-16_1460704043361.jpg


TeMo_BSR_PortsFerries.png

https://www.espon.eu/opencms/opencms/BSR/Transport_infrastructures/Ferries_and_seaports.html

After visiting the port of Gdynia, USS Cook has made a port call in Riga, Latvia (April 14 to 21)
http://baltic-review.com/lithuania-warship-klaipeda/
http://www.c6f.navy.mil/news/uss-donald-cook-departs-riga

  • April 14, USS Donald Cook moored at Passenger Terminal in Port of Constanta, Romania, for a three-day port visit. Departed Black Sea on April 24.
  • December 30, [2014] The Donald Cook moored at Passenger Terminal in Port of Constanta, Romania, for a four-day liberty visit.
  • January 8, 2015 The guided-missile destroyer moored at Berth 7, Container Terminal in Port of Varna East, Bulgaria, for a two-day port call. Participated in a Passing Exercise (PASSEX) with the UKRS Hetman Sahaidachny (U130) on Jan. 11; Departed Black Sea on Jan. 14.
  • August 31 [2015], USS Donald Cook moored at the newly-constructed container terminal at Quarantine Mole in Port of Odessa, Ukraine, for the in-port phase of annual NATO exercise Sea Breeze; Underway for at-sea phase from Sept. 8-11; Inport Odessa again from Sept. 11-12; Departed Black Sea on Sept. 13; Inport Souda Bay from Sept. 15-16.
  • April 8 [2016], DDG 75 moored at Romanian Quay in Port of Gdynia, Poland, for a three-day port visit.
  • April 14 [2016], USS Donald Cook moored at Berth 80a, Passenger and Cargo Terminal in Port of Klaipeda, Lithuania, for a four-day port visit; Moored at Bulk Terminal in Port of Riga, Latvia, from April 19-21.
http://www.uscarriers.net/ddg75history.htm

BALTOPS (Baltic Operations) is an annual military exercise, held and sponsored by the Commander, United States Naval Forces Europe, since 1971, in the Baltic Sea and the regions surrounding it.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BALTOPS

USS Cole to visit Sweden after exercise
By By Navy Lt.(j.g.) Amanda Canedo USS Cole Public Affairs
June 30, 2008
http://www.eucom.mil/media-library/article/20524/uss-cole-visit-sweden-exercise

Regular visitor!
 
332644C000000578-3540893-The_USS_Cook_was_70_miles_marked_by_dotted_line_from_the_Russian-a-16_1460704043361.jpg


In this image, in the sea portion, you can actually see the dotted lines representing the shippinglanes, which any ships (including warships) would follow. Not that 70 miles puts you on a shipping lane. Also, it is impossible to reach the Polish ports of Gdansk and Gdynia witthout coming within 70 miles of Kaliningrad Oblast.

In 1999, the naval base at Gdynia became the home base of all NATO submarine forces in the Baltic. The headquarters of the Polish armed forces naval command is also in Gdynia. This port is the homeport of the Polish 3rd ship flotilla, which includes the ex-USN Perry class frigates.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3rd_Ship_Flotilla

USS Cook visited Gdynia from 8 april for 3 days, which mean she left on the 10th, 11th or 12th, depending on what time exactly she moored and unmoored. Reports that it got buzzed emerged april 13 (so that probably happen on the 12th and/or the 11th). She arrive in Riga April 14. I doubt very much she would not have travelled to Riga via normal shipping lanes (a flight/landing exercise might have been conducted outside the lanes, for obvious - e.g. safety - reasons)
 
Very irresponsible behavior by the Ships why come close to bear when bear is sleeping

Obviously when an uninvited guest comes too close , they have to be welcomed by a visitor in air

The ship "Destroyer" sends the wrong type of message if it is in wrong side of he sea
 
Very irresponsible behavior by the Ships why come close to bear when bear is sleeping

Obviously when an uninvited guest comes too close , they have to be welcomed by a visitor in air

The ship "Destroyer" sends the wrong type of message if it is in wrong side of he sea
Obviously, you haven't looked at a single map. To enter the Baltic from the Polish side of Gdansk Bay, a ship has to sail within 50 kilometres of the strategically vital Russian enclave of Kaliningrad. There is no alternative route.

Please explain what is irresponsible about a warship using international shipping lanes while making visits to friendly ports. How else would you suggest a warship visit Gdynia, which is a Polish naval base.

If you look at the baltic coast, Russia 'owns' about 7% of it. The rest is to Finland, Sweden, Denmark, Germany, Poland, Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania, all of which with the exception of Lithuania have more Baltic coastline than Russia has.

About half of the Russian Baltic is Kaliningrad Oblast, which is former KÖNIGSBERG . The Soviet Union, Russia’s predecessor, occupied it after the Second World War, and today it is home to almost one million people. As such it is a remnant of the post WW2 Soviet era. Prior to 1945, it never was integral part of Russia.

The town of Baltiysk, just outside Kaliningrad, is the only Russian Baltic Sea port said to be "ice-free" all year round, and the region hence plays an important role in maintenance of the Baltic Fleet.

Nobody is seriously contesting it, or the Russian Federation. The U.S. was and is not challenging Russia’s ownership of the region because its legal status did not matter to Washington. NATO has acknowledged Russia’s de facto if not its de jure possession of Kaliningrad.



Ship visits have never been a problem.

2007: Chinese warships visit St. Petersburg (incl. Type 052B guided missile destroyer Guangzhou)
http://www.gov.cn/english/2007-08/28/content_729312_2.htm

2009: France’s Mistral amphibious assault ship visits St. Petersburg
http://sputniknews.com/photo/20091124/156967239.html

2010: BF landing ship Kaliningrad returned to base after friendly visit to Poland
http://rusnavy.com/news/site/detail.php?ID=9457&print=Y

US Navy ships will visit Russia's Baltic, Pacific, and Northern fleets in 2011, said Stevens. Roughly, American warships will call at Baltiysk, Vladivostok, and Murmansk; those visits will strengthen good relations between Russian and American people, added the officer. As for him, US warship is supposed to call at Murmansk in Aug-Sept. Deputy naval attaché told that the visit to Baltic Fleet's main naval base Baltiysk would be held a bit earlier, presumably late in July. A US Navy ship plans to participate in Russian Navy Day's festivities on the last Sunday of July. Vladivostok will meet Americans twice in 2011 – on US Independence Day on July 4 and in the fall. According to US Consulate General in St. Petersburg Sheila Gwaltney headed an official delegation, the forthcoming visits are not only a port calls but another token of respect for Russia, and clear evidence of developing cooperation between the two navies. Visits will strengthen good relations between Russian and American people, cites her inonews.ru.
http://rusnavy.com/news/site/detail.php?ID=11980&print=Y

2011: Navy warship USS 'Independence' docks in St. Petersburg for Labor Day Weekend (LCS 2)
http://www.tampabay.com/news/milita...n-st-petersburg-for-labor-day-weekend/1189487

2012; Guided-missile cruiser USS Normandy (CG 60) arrived in Baltiysk, Russia, to participate in the annual multinational Exercise FRUKUS 2012, June 24.
http://navaltoday.com/2012/06/27/uss-normandy-arrives-in-baltiysk/

2013: Japanese warships arrive in St. Petersburg on first visit (Two destroyers of the Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force DD-127 Isoyuki and DD-123 Shirayuki)
http://tass.ru/en/world/697979

An extremely rare visitor to A&P Falmouth had a few heads turning in the port on Thursday (24 October) when the shipyard welcomed the state-of-the-art Russian warship the Soobrazitelny. The ship is based in Baltiysk and is part of the Russian Baltic Fleet.
http://radar.ap-group.co.uk/2013/10/31/russian-warship-makes-a-rare-visit-to-falmouth/

Since the 1970s, NATO has conducted BALTOPS annual exercises in the Baltic: never a problem. Baltops '15 exercise includes 50 ships from 17 nations.
 
Last edited:
Why does the US require US Battle Armadas in Chinese Sea, Russian Sea and all over the world? Why aren't they content just defending their own coastlines? Why do they have to project power all the way across the world? What would the US reaction be if the Russian destroyers were like 200-300 miles off the US coast???
 
And this is how it should be done:
HMS Argyll, a Type 23 frigate with advanced Artisan radar, used a Lynx helicopter and sensors to locate and monitor the Russian warship as it passed within 20 miles of the Kent coast in the Strait of Dover.
...
Commander Paul Hammond, commanding officer of HMS Argyll, said: "We are one of the Royal Navy’s high readiness ships and we knew we could be called upon to respond a range of duties, such as monitoring a Russian warship, at short notice."

The spokeswoman said the Russian ship's movement through British waters on its way home was "not hostile or out of routine".

She added: "Under the UN Convention of the Law of the Sea (1982), right of innocent passage to all warships through territorial waters is allowed, provided it is not prejudicial to peace, good order or security of the coastal state.

"Submarines and other underwater vehicles are required to navigate on the surface and to show their flag."
http://news.sky.com/story/1429021/russian-frigate-tracked-20-miles-from-uk-coast

Amount : 20 miles (mi of length)
Equals : 17.38 nautical miles (NM - nmi / length)
Which places the Russian ship in the UKs contiguous zone.

USS Carr Makes Port Visit to Baltiysk
military_uss_carr_136_1.jpg
The USS Carr conducted a two-day port visit to the city of Baltiysk, August 3-4, the first ever visit of a U.S. Navy vessel to Kaliningrad Oblast. The crew of roughly 200 personnel hosted local dignitaries from the city as well as from nearby Kaliningrad, including numerous political figures and senior military officials. In addition to several formal protocol meetings by the Carr’s Commanding Officer and a wreath laying event at the Baltiysk World War II memorial, the Carr’s crewmembers played sports with Russian counterparts, visited local museums, and were tour guests aboard a Russian warship. An evening reception aboard USS Carr was held for a local Russian veterans group, including retired admirals and senior officers, who also had their own tour of the ship. The Carr’s sailors built stronger community relations by volunteering to paint a local orphanage as well as sharing an “American” hamburger lunch and playing sports with the orphans.
http://www.state.gov/p/eur/ci/rs/usrussiabilat/c38712.htm
2013

Why does the US require US Battle Armadas in Chinese Sea, Russian Sea and all over the world? Why aren't they content just defending their own coastlines? Why do they have to project power all the way across the world? What would the US reaction be if the Russian destroyers were like 200-300 miles off the US coast???
1. We're talking a single ship here.
2. E.g just last year, chinese navy warships passed into US territorial waters last year after exercising with Russian ships, and there was nothing wrong with that, or a military alert of any kind.
3. Russian warship routinely visit Havana, Cuba again since 2008. This is about 100 miles from Florida. Ships included Moskva (Slava) class guided missile cruiser, Udaloy class ASW destroyer, intelligence ships.
4. Russia exercises with e.g. the navy of Venezuela (incl. 24k ton Kirov cruiser Pjots Velikyi)

No problem.

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/russian-ship-may-be-mapping-united-states-commucations-cables-florida/
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/7759892.stm
https://www.rt.com/news/224627-russian-spy-ship-havana/ (2015)
https://www.yahoo.com/news/russia-warship-docks-havana-harbor-171336044.html?ref=gs (2014)
http://navaltoday.com/2015/01/21/russian-navys-warship-docks-in-cuba/ (2013)
http://www.nbcnews.com/id/28316542/.../t/russian-warships-visit-cold-war-ally-cuba/ (2008)


Russia apparently has no problem with a Chinese Type 052C destroyer Jinan visiting Gdynia navy port in Poland (the same port visited by USS Cook, before it got buzzed, just as close to Kaliningrad Oblask), escprted by two more warships QIANDAOHU and YIYANG. (october 2015)
http://i1os.com/Zrsmoe5b-ns.video
https://ruptly.tv/vod/20151007-060
http://www.alamy.com/stock-photo-gd...e-warships-the-first-ever-visit-88236342.html
 
Last edited:
Why don't seen a more smaller ship like a global cutter

Russian-Navy-Receives-Second-Project-21980-Grachonok-Anti-Terror-Boat-300x160.jpg
 
Back
Top Bottom