What's new

We should worry more about Pakistan than North Korea

IF USA wanted to I'm sure they could do so without direct military action on a massive scale.

They can definitely isolate you globally . They are still by far the most influential country in the world.

Every nation worth anything still listens to USA first

HEAD OF NATO including Turkey
Most of the Arabs especially Saudi & Dubai & Emirates
Runs the UN & THE IMF

They can definitel look to sabotage your communication and radars to blind your air space

And then look to try to steal or destroy your nuclear programme with a navy seal tream

THAT IS WITHOUT A MASSIVE BOMBING CAMPAIGN

Destruction of your enrichment plant completely would SET YOU back years and destroy hundreds of millions of dollars of infrastructure.

PS I AM NOT SAYING IT WLL HAPPEN.

BUT THIS IS USA we are talking about NOT CHINA not RUSSIA

this is the big daddy HIMSELF
 
. .
What is stopping you? Pakistan & Israel are not allies like US & Pakistan. What is your excuse?
If Pakistan is your allies than why your govt are ranting about Pakistan about its nukes:hitwall::blah::devil:, than you would consider also to disarm Indian and Israeli nukes also, what a double standard your govt have:enjoy:
 
. .
If Pakistan is your allies than why your govt are ranting about Pakistan about its nukes:hitwall::blah::devil:, than you would consider also to disarm Indian and Israeli nukes also, what a double standard your govt have:enjoy:

We still consider Pakistan as an ally hence such deals.

PAKISTAN ORDERS TWO CORVETTES FROM US-BASED SWIFTSHIPS

http://quwa.org/2017/10/31/pakistan-orders-two-corvettes-us-based-swiftships/


Pakistan seeks new US deal after returning nine choppers

https://www.dawn.com/news/1367382/pakistan-seeks-new-us-deal-after-returning-nine-choppers


 
.
Bullshit.

Pakistan's nuclear assets are perfectly protected. This American senator is an idiot.

They are beginning the process of 'what if' scenarios. The target is Pakistan. After Syria, it's Pakistan.

Wait for them to publicize their concern for the 'oppressed' Baluchi people who need liberating.
 
.
Then why your government think that Pakistani nukes is usafe, please answer my that question

They are beginning the process of 'what if' scenarios. The target is Pakistan. After Syria, it's Pakistan.

Wait for them to publicize their concern for the 'oppressed' Baluchi people who need liberating.
And Pakistan is not syria,Iraq or Afghanistan we have well developed armed forces, they attack they pay for that:p:
 
.
Then why your government think that Pakistani nukes is usafe, please answer my that question

Af-Pak region is infested with terrorists. Now you may argue that you do not support & harbor any but it lacks credibility here for right or wrong reasons. There is a huge concern here that Pakistan's nukes will make their way into the hands of the terrorists willingly (assuming that Pakistan is covertly supporting them) or unwilling (assuming that Pakistan has no control on these terrorists).
 
.
Af-Pak region is infested with terrorists. Now you may argue that you do not support & harbor any but it lacks credibility here for right or wrong reasons. There is a huge concern here that Pakistan's nukes will make their way into the hands of the terrorists willingly (assuming that Pakistan is covertly supporting them) or unwilling (assuming that Pakistan has no control on these terrorists).

Your terrorist aren't our terrorists.
 
.
Af-Pak region is infested with terrorists. Now you may argue that you do not support & harbor any but it lacks credibility here for right or wrong reasons. There is a huge concern here that Pakistan's nukes will make their way into the hands of the terrorists willingly (assuming that Pakistan is covertly supporting them) or unwilling (assuming that Pakistan has no control on these terrorists).
You mean like the WMD's in Iraq?
 
.
Af-Pak region is infested with terrorists. Now you may argue that you do not support & harbor any but it lacks credibility here for right or wrong reasons. There is a huge concern here that Pakistan's nukes will make their way into the hands of the terrorists willingly (assuming that Pakistan is covertly supporting them) or unwilling (assuming that Pakistan has no control on these terrorists).
You created Al-Qaida and Taliban to break Soviet union we suffer most of that reason, its your responsibility to clean this mess in Afghanistan, we clean most of them , than you consider that Palestines and Indian terrorist should steal their nukes blow somewhere else so you should also consider that their nukes is also unsafe
 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
IF USA wanted to I'm sure they could do so without direct military action on a massive scale.

They can definitely isolate you globally . They are still by far the most influential country in the world.

Every nation worth anything still listens to USA first

HEAD OF NATO including Turkey
Most of the Arabs especially Saudi & Dubai & Emirates
Runs the UN & THE IMF

They can definitel look to sabotage your communication and radars to blind your air space

And then look to try to steal or destroy your nuclear programme with a navy seal tream

THAT IS WITHOUT A MASSIVE BOMBING CAMPAIGN

Destruction of your enrichment plant completely would SET YOU back years and destroy hundreds of millions of dollars of infrastructure.

PS I AM NOT SAYING IT WLL HAPPEN.

BUT THIS IS USA we are talking about NOT CHINA not RUSSIA

this is the big daddy HIMSELF

Its a country, not an omnipotent power. Lets realize this before getting carried away.

Nobody listens to the US when their own interests are on the line. This goes for Turkey and Arabs concerning Pakistan. Some of the latter have interests in Pakistan's security and strategic assets which outweigh what they owe to the Americans. But lets leave that aside since Pakistan cannot and must not count on anyone but itself in such challenging circumstances.

On the issue of LP, I think members are getting excited about nothing here. Pressler had his time and he did what he could. He tried to hurt Pakistan and did to a certain extent, but in the end Pakistan got its way by not only acquiring the weapons capability but also expanding it significantly and thus in the end achieving exactly what Pressler was attempting to avoid.

That he says the things he says is also fine given he is a member of the Indian caucus and his constituents amongst the Indians who host him on all sorts of junkets to India expect him to say such things. This is par for the course in US politics where lobbying by various interests groups plays an important role and drives the behaviour of the politicians.

What Pakistan has carefully considered is the way Iran and NK have gone about not giving an inch on their red lines as their own survival depends upon it against enormous American/allied pressure. This means Pakistan will literally "eat grass" but will NEVER give up its nuclear capability for the same reasons. The Americans certainly have the capability to come and grab some, destroy others but to my point, they are not everywhere and neither are they omnipotent. Also worth considering is that tackling Iraq was a behemoth of a challenge with 60M people. Afghanistan a little less so. Pakistan a country of 210M people is a far, far more challenging task to take on for any country no matter how big or powerful! I will also venture to say that before Pakistan is forced to give up its strategic assets by way of force, it will certainly exercise its "Samson" option which potentially includes exercising the "use it or lose it" clause and secondly by delivering the capability to other friendlies and thus expanding the group of countries with such capabilities specially in the Muslim world and completely upending the NPT for good.
 
.
Nothing stops us from invading you today except for our magnanimity towards our allies.

:lol:

No, what stops you is the fact that we have 230 million militant minded Muslims and over 140 nukes.

Don't be silly, invading us will simply yield too high a cost that you won't be able to pay.

Pakistan is over rated. Pakistan is neither Russia nor China.

Nope, we're much worse

:devil:

Our nukes are aimed at only one country

No, they're aimed at two.

We'll nuke Israel and make it into dust. Hahahhahaha

There's also the military bases America has across the region.

IF USA wanted to I'm sure they could do so without direct military action on a massive scale.

They can definitely isolate you globally . They are still by far the most influential country in the world.

Every nation worth anything still listens to USA first

HEAD OF NATO including Turkey
Most of the Arabs especially Saudi & Dubai & Emirates
Runs the UN & THE IMF

They can definitel look to sabotage your communication and radars to blind your air space

And then look to try to steal or destroy your nuclear programme with a navy seal tream

THAT IS WITHOUT A MASSIVE BOMBING CAMPAIGN

Destruction of your enrichment plant completely would SET YOU back years and destroy hundreds of millions of dollars of infrastructure.

PS I AM NOT SAYING IT WLL HAPPEN.

BUT THIS IS USA we are talking about NOT CHINA not RUSSIA

this is the big daddy HIMSELF

Well, big daddy cried like a baby after having to deal with some shepherds in Afghanistan.
 
.
IF USA wanted to I'm sure they could do so without direct military action on a massive scale.

They can definitely isolate you globally . They are still by far the most influential country in the world.

Every nation worth anything still listens to USA first

HEAD OF NATO including Turkey
Most of the Arabs especially Saudi & Dubai & Emirates
Runs the UN & THE IMF

They can definitel look to sabotage your communication and radars to blind your air space

And then look to try to steal or destroy your nuclear programme with a navy seal tream

THAT IS WITHOUT A MASSIVE BOMBING CAMPAIGN

Destruction of your enrichment plant completely would SET YOU back years and destroy hundreds of millions of dollars of infrastructure.

PS I AM NOT SAYING IT WLL HAPPEN.

BUT THIS IS USA we are talking about NOT CHINA not RUSSIA

this is the big daddy HIMSELF
USA doesn't work like that
Pakistan despite being run by idiots still has Arab world, Turkey, china support to whom USA will listen
US had hard time convincing Europe for state like IRAN which has haters all over including in Arab world, Israel and turkey
 
.
When ever US government done with building a negative image of yours amongst their citizens, You'd only expect showering of Tomahawks on your sites while you can't do anything.
USA has already built a very negative image of North Korea in its public since 50s but still tread with caution due to nukes we r far more powerful then them so no need for foreign ignorant trolls to start dancing on every tom.dick and Harry even an ex official at that interview ;)
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom