What's new

We should worry more about Pakistan than North Korea

I have been hearing his name since 90s. Must be a old f@rt by now. Coming from retirement to cash on Pakistan bashing? Freak.
 
.
This guy is / was a senator
and his whole thesis is based on "Imagine This"
now heeding to his own officers and government's acknowledgement of the safeguards placed
around nuclear weapons.

He wants to make a buck, mother india is churning them moist and hot !

There are many paid authors that US use to float different Point of Views (some time its dis-information and some time its to see the reaction to that PoW) and act accordingly, and is something goes wrong make a u-turn by saying it was not a official point of view , attack on Iraq for WMD is an example (which was later told to be the a academic research work 'only'). This is getting a common tactics for others (in social media)
Heres another
https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/indi...tion-by-2027-hindu-yuva-vahini-leader.526002/
 
Last edited:
.
Imagine this: A small group of terrorists buys a nuclear weapon from Pakistani generals with dark money and transports it to the port of Karachi in a pickup truck. From there, the weapon is hidden in a crate, cushioned amongst textiles and agricultural products, and loaded onto a container ship bound for the United States, where it could very easily destroy one of our cities. This operation could be carried out by a fairly small number of terrorists.

:omghaha:

The US is the only country that has used nuclear weapons against a country. It is also the only country to 'accidentally lose' nukes and yes, you heard the last part right.
 
.
Nothing stops us from invading you today except for our magnanimity towards our allies.
:cheesy::cheesy::cheesy::cheesy::cheesy:HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA,i am sorry,could you please repeat that again?your magnanimity ?towards your allies?:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:,can you defend yorself from noko? still in iraq hangover pal?why dont you try giving up your "magnanimity"?we wont be here,but so wont be you,on the face of the map :partay:
 
. .
Imagine this: A small group of terrorists buys a nuclear weapon from Pakistani generals with dark money and transports it to the port of Karachi in a pickup truck. From there, the weapon is hidden in a crate, cushioned amongst textiles and agricultural products, and loaded onto a container ship bound for the United States, where it could very easily destroy one of our cities. This operation could be carried out by a fairly small number of terrorists.

Which c@@@ wrote this shit, this is worse then what our Gangadeshi neighbours come up with. :lol:

On a more serious note, maybe if Americans stopped invading countries thousands of KMs away the world would not need to have nuclear weapons, only USA has so far used nuclear weapons and that too on civilians. Under Trump USA is going rogue.

No empire lasts for ever Yankies, we are the children of River Indus while you are nothing but thieves who stole lands from the Natives, you have no history, Pakistanis know how to survive on one bread, most of Americans would die of starving without your daily dosage of McDonald's.
 
.
http://thehill.com/opinion/internat...re-about-nukes-from-pakistan-than-north-korea

We should worry more about Pakistan than North Korea

BY FORMER SEN. LARRY PRESSLER (R-S.D.), OPINION CONTRIBUTOR — 09/13/17 09:00 AM EDT 39
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED BY CONTRIBUTORS ARE THEIR OWN AND NOT THE VIEW OF THE HILL
164

pakistan.jpg

© Getty Images
North Korea’s brazen and defiant nuclear tests last week have been keeping our leadership up at night, and for good reason. Meanwhile, Pakistan’s unsecured nuclear weapons program is even more dangerous and should keep all of us up at night.

Imagine this: A small group of terrorists buys a nuclear weapon from Pakistani generals with dark money and transports it to the port of Karachi in a pickup truck. From there, the weapon is hidden in a crate, cushioned amongst textiles and agricultural products, and loaded onto a container ship bound for the United States, where it could very easily destroy one of our cities. This operation could be carried out by a fairly small number of terrorists.

This scenario is a disaster waiting to happen because Pakistan continues to harbor some of the most hardened Islamic militants and terrorists within its borders and because the security of Pakistan’s nuclear weapons is suspect, even though Pakistani leaders insist their program is safeguarded. The dangers of their nuclear weapons program are many: they are routinely moved around the country over dangerous and treacherous roads in unmarked vehicles with few defenses.

Pakistan’s leaders have essentially blackmailed us into providing aid for the War on Terror with threats to cease assistance in rooting out terrorists in Afghanistan. Meanwhile, we know full well that Pakistan allows terrorists to operate unfettered in large swaths of its southwestern province of Baluchistan and their potential access to Pakistan’s nuclear weapons should keep us all up at night.


We let Pakistan use U.S. taxpayer money in the 1970s and 1980s to build their nuclear weapons program. Why do we now let them use U.S. taxpayer money to harbor terrorists? Without our money and military supplies, Pakistan would be powerless. Why do we continue to call Pakistan an ally? Why do we continue to be blackmailed?

As I state emphatically in my newly released book, “Neighbours in Arms: An American Senator’s Quest for Disarmament in a Nuclear Subcontinent,” Pakistan should be treated like North Korea, like a rogue state. The only reason Pakistan is not a totally failed state is that countries like China and the United States continue to prop it up with massive amounts of foreign aid. Unless Pakistan changes its ways with respect to terrorism, it should be declared a terrorist state. Indeed, the first Bush administration seriously considered doing so in 1992.

During my tenure as the chairman of the Arms Control Subcommittee of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, I worked hard, along with my colleague Sen. John Glenn (D-Ohio), to keep nuclear weapons out of the hands of Pakistan, most notably through a piece of legislation called the Pressler Amendment.

Named after me, it was enforced under President Bush in 1990 when he could not certify that Pakistan did not have a nuclear weapon. As a result, all aid to Pakistan was immediately cut off. It was the ultimate diplomatic “stick.” Unfortunately, the generals in the Pentagon continued to find ways to fund the generals in Islamabad and the Pressler Amendment’s effectiveness and enforcement withered.

Now, the Trump administration appears to be ready to take a much harder line against this corrupt nation, and President Trump is advocating for a much stronger relationship with India, as evidenced by his strong rhetoric last week. U.S. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson publicly stated that he would advocate for negotiations with the Taliban.

Indeed, for the first time in my lifetime, a fundamental shift in foreign policy towards Pakistan appears to be underway. News reports from that region indicate that Pakistanis are already angry about Trump’s statements. These policy changes signal a stark shift from previous presidents and are long overdue. But in my opinion, they are necessary because Pakistan will only respond to punitive action that hits where it hurts: in their pocketbooks.

I agree with Trump, but I would press for an even closer relationship with India. We must not equivocate. We must decisively choose India as our nation’s most favored ally in the world, on a par with the special relationships we have with Israel and the United Kingdom. Oddly enough, the election of Trump as president might be the best thing for the relationship between the world’s two largest democracies.

Larry Pressler served three terms as U.S. senator from South Dakota. He is the author of the newly published book, “Neighbours in Arms: An American Senator’s Quest for Disarmament in a Nuclear Subcontinent.”
Money talks bullshit rocks. We all know who is sponsoring him now a days.
http://www.hindustantimes.com/india...-us-senator/story-nCWawy929kJ3iaw3TO9IUK.html
 
.
People are acting like our nuclear weapons are openly waiting for anyone to capture them.

1) they won't find them
2) even they do find them they won't know how to use them.
3) if they do know how to use them they won't be able to. There are codes that activate nuclear weapons which are placed during the manufacturing of the bomb.

They can drive a massive car bomb into the bomb there will be NO nuclear explosion. There will be a regular explosion.

People who don't know shit are easily susceptible to anti-Pakistan elements. This is why they want Pakistan to be destabilised to have an excuse to take control of our nuclear assets. They want the Afghan war to spill over inside Pakistan hence the "do more do more."

Sir article shows that perhaps Mr Pressler knows shit about science and nuclear weapons. Perhaps he thinks that terrorists will also stole a Missile launcher along with code until and unless they can cause nuclear explosion by using a hammer.
Your answer is the most logical one but perhaps USA always requires a make shift enemy especially from Muslim world to keep there people in constant fear whether it is Iraq or Syria. And from time to time Pakistan as a country or it's so called religious terrorists.

The views given by Pressler have been rejected by scientists/professionals many times in old days on same grounds explained by your self but perhaps USA has has the most dumb advisers and now a joker named Trump as their president who believes in first stage on white supremacy and secondly for Muslim animosity.
 
. . .
Nothing stops us from invading you today except for our magnanimity towards our allies.

RE: Actually no.

Rand Thank tank did an evaluation of a proposed invasion of Pakistan in 2001 and they assessed you and your "allies" would have a 500K plus casualties.

this is now 2017 where Pakistan Military has now over 200K specially trained soldiers in COIN plus a decade of actual combat. Your 100K soldiers plus contractors were unable to defeat 40K+ Afgan Taliban soldiers despite all the resources in the world, what makes you think you will be successful against Pakistan?.

The truth is Pakistan can give you and your allies a bashing you will never forget. Each year I see Pakistan military getting better and better. Pakistan Army went into North Wazeritan and cleared it an area the Red army tried and failed your yellow belly soldiers didnt even bother apart from some ineffective drone strikes killing women and children. Your military knows that so apart from public crying there is really not much you can do against Pakistan.
 
. .
Mr. Pressler is behaving like an Ex-Wife, just cant let Pakistan go

When ever US government done with building a negative image of yours amongst their citizens, You'd only expect showering of Tomahawks on your sites while you can't do anything.

you can live this wet dream of some other power destroying Pakistan, how about growing some balls and do it yourself for once, you people should be ashamed of yourself calling yourself next super power...just pray Pakistan never get economically strong or your bhindia will only be found in history books.

CPEC you!
 
.
you can live this wet dream of some other power destroying Pakistan, how about growing some balls and do it yourself for once, you people should be ashamed of yourself calling yourself next super power...just pray Pakistan never get economically strong or your bhindia will only be found in history books.

CPEC you!
Why so much frustration?

~I'm Groot
 
. .

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom