What's new

We do not even match up Pakistan as far defence goes: IAF Vice Chief

Status
Not open for further replies.
Just paving IAFs way towards getting S-400s and some more anti air mutations while poors in india sell their children he will still protect those dying sould by shiny things...
 
Just paving IAFs way towards getting S-400s and some more anti air mutations while poors in india sell their children he will still protect those dying sould by shiny things...

Kid its your country which spends around 3.4% GDP in defence which has very small economy.
and check th date of the thread
 
Not true. It's a ploy to get the Indian political leadership to pay attention to the IAF's demands. The VCAS realizes that unless he throws the P word in their, his demands won't be met. Most defence organizations in the wrold engage in such propaganda, the Iaf is no different. How do you think the USAF tried to justify the aquisition demand for 700+ F-22s? By exaggerating the Soviet, later Russian, threats.

There is absolutely no reason for Pakistanis to feel any differently because of this report. Indian war fighting potential, particularly in the air, is miles ahead. PAF is well aware of this, let's not fool ourslves.

Hey, they've always been ahead; but that didnt stop PAF from getting a 1:10 kill ratio in the 1965 war or it didnt stop 5000 Pakistani Soldiers and Pasthun militias from capturing strategic mountain points against a regular force of 30,000; it didnt stop Muslim Militias from capturing half of Kashmir from the combined forces of the Indian Army and the Dogra regime, it didnt stop us from acquiring nuclear weapons when the world thought that a country with our economic situation could not acquire anything close to a nuclear weapon. Sure Indian Military is miles ahead in quantitative terms, but never in quality excluding our Navy. Our Infantry is a decade ahead in qualitative terms and our Air Force and Armoured Corps also has a clear qualitative edge.

Kid its your country which spends around 3.4% GDP in defence which has very small economy.
and check th date of the thread
We spend 2.7.
 
Guys wake up this is a six yr old thread . let it rest.
 
Hey, they've always been ahead; but that didnt stop PAF from getting a 1:10 kill ratio in the 1965 war or it didnt stop 5000 Pakistani Soldiers and Pasthun militias from capturing strategic mountain points against a regular force of 30,000; it didnt stop Muslim Militias from capturing half of Kashmir from the combined forces of the Indian Army and the Dogra regime, it didnt stop us from acquiring nuclear weapons when the world thought that a country with our economic situation could not acquire anything close to a nuclear weapon. Sure Indian Military is miles ahead in quantitative terms, but never in quality excluding our Navy. Our Infantry is a decade ahead in qualitative terms and our Air Force and Armoured Corps also has a clear qualitative edge.


We spend 2.7.
Your soldiers occupied Indian posts when our soldiers had left the post during winter.COWARDS!!!
And they were beaten back across the border
Your air force was too scared challenge iaf bombing the **** out of your army
No your air force do not have any edge over iaf
Anymore Do u expect some 18 f16 c/d variants have any effect over 200 or so mki and other jets
Yes your artillery is better than us for now,but we are currently inducting new ones
Also No tank in Your armoured corps have an advantage over the T90-s
 
Looks like indians need more aircrafts.it's not the first they're using this tactic.
 
Your soldiers occupied Indian posts when our soldiers had left the post during winter.COWARDS!!!
And they were beaten back across the border
Your air force was too scared challenge iaf bombing the **** out of your army
No your air force do not have any edge over iaf
Anymore Do u expect some 18 f16 c/d variants have any effect over 200 or so mki and other jets
Yes your artillery is better than us for now,but we are currently inducting new ones
Also No tank in Your armoured corps have an advantage over the T90-s
1: Our military only left when Nawaz Sharif found out about the conflict and pressured Musharraf to fall back.
2: Our Air Force was held back by Nawaz Sharif, and was never needed in the first place. Our Infantry shot down 3 IAF aircraft, IAF failed to bring it's Air Force after 3 of its jets were shot down by Anza in the conflict.
3: India has nothing to match the f-16
4: Meanwhile we are acquiring latest Turkish artillery
5: Our Al Khalid II is equal if not better than the T-90. Al Khalid is also being upgraded with better systems. Al Khalid can now carry the new Pakistani Niazi rounds, which enable an Al Khalid to destroy a T-90 with a single shot. All these upgrades make the Al Khalid better than the T-90.

Our infantry is physically, mentally, equipment wise and every other factor better than the Indian infantry.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom