What's new

We Are All Harappans

dancing-girl-1024.jpg


Depiction of pointy faced Aryan found in IVC.
 
. .
So basically the Indians are still refusing to release raw DNA data.

But based on what the researchers are saying, to summarize, Rakhigarhi lacks Steppe Indo-Aryan DNA. No $hit genius!! It simply reinforces the Aryan invasion theory!
 
.
It is what we call glory hunters.

The people of the land with solid lineage to it , culturally, ethnically, linguistically, are THE custodians of the land and it's history. No OUTSIDER can claim it. We are the Indus and Indus is us.
How do you know that? Any evidence to corroborate your statement?
 
.
The whole world laughs at these dark skinned Dravidian dasyus. They literally have no accomplishments to their name whatsoever in history. They have been ruled by foreigners for their whole history. First it was the Aryans (our ancestors) who subjugated these aboriginal monkeys later establishing a caste system whose decendants are Brahmins. Then it was Muslim invaders (again from Pakistan), then British.

Now these aboriginal Gangadeshis are trying to claim our history for their own like they don’t have their own Tamil bullshit to go be proud of. Actually what is there to be proud of anyway for them. They are subjugated since beginning of time.
 
.
dancing-girl-1024.jpg


Depiction of pointy faced Aryan found in IVC.

Nice try Shudra. Just because there exists sculptures of monkey gods and half human half elephant gods in Gangladesh doesn’t mean they exist either. For all we know that sculpture could have been a early goddess of IVC which is very likely
 
. . .
published on
Volume 17 - Issue 20, Sep. 30 - Oct. 13, 2000

And of course today is 2000 or 2018 .


And you lot are just aboriginals from the Ganga. Nothing less nothing more. Just about still struggling to learn the basics of civilization such as toilet manners.

We of course are the nobility of the mighty Indus. Pakistan is the modern iteration of story that began on the banks of Indus 10,000 years ago. Since you suffer from some form of schizophrenia I will give you a lesson on where Indus Valley is and then referance it with the cradle of the aboriginals - the Holy Ganga. And hey look where Harappa is? Surprise, surprise it is distal and 1,000 miles from where many Indian live.



3xwUZ7Z.png



46aB9e7.jpg
Shinde: This whole area, the ancient Saraswati region, is so important. Two-thirds of the Harappan sites are in this region. And maybe not many sites in the Indus region.
Saraswati-River_1.jpg


The whole world laughs at these dark skinned Dravidian dasyus. They literally have no accomplishments to their name whatsoever in history. They have been ruled by foreigners for their whole history. First it was the Aryans (our ancestors) who subjugated these aboriginal monkeys later establishing a caste system whose decendants are Brahmins. Then it was Muslim invaders (again from Pakistan), then British.

You know people of IVC are distinct from the later on arrived so called Aryans .

You can't claim descendants of IVC and aryans at the same time .

BTW most pakistais think they are descendant of Arab invader MD Qasim or Mughals etc

So the question that comes to mind , How many fathers do u got ??o_O:o:8-)

@Indus Pakistan
 
.
Umm... Literally, the retard racism even with the samples? A sample from all the way up in Haryana shows no C. Asian markings, even when today C. Asian markings shows up as low geographically as S. India even among most tribals even. Markers show M.E. farmers and S. Asian Hunter and gather mixed - an affinity to ASI, not ANI, which is the other major marker in S. Asia, which will come about later from this sample's death.

So when you go about retard statements like Ganga, Shudra, what have you, you do realize that's what some of the population is made up of, right? When you show your racist face to tribals, Ganga, or whatever nonsense - You do realize that's also in your make up too, right? ASI along with ANI marker are what makes S. Asians who they are, just in different frequencies.

Instead of the stupid racism, you should realize how connected this huge land mass of the subcontinent is. Even the tribal of tribal are somehow connected to you.
 
Last edited:
.
With that said... The notion of the, "out of India", theory is wrong.

There was an major incursion into India from C. Asia that brought about a four runner of Indo-Aryan religion and language.... And also genes...

However, an invasion isnt proven. Though, I wouldnt throw out the idea what so ever.

I do believe the Indus Val Civ did degrade and went back to rural communities by the time of the incursion. Because when C. Asians go to most places, they adopt the local customs, script, etc. for the most part which they did after the invasion of Mesopotamia, Anatolia, Greece, Egypt as well. To an extent this happened, but Indus valley script, architecture, planning, general sophistication was lost.

What ever happened in ancient India during and after the vedic period came out colorful to say the least and imagery-wise dont look like an offshot of C. Asia even though the language and the main religion being stemmed from there.

doAdW.jpg

03hiFv8.jpg

5cLHOrl.jpg

rvoiFDn.jpg

x79daeE.jpg

Ptq63.jpg

5yCfNsM.jpg

peUAWnR.jpg

5AbZRPa.jpg






There was a bizarre compromise of sorts if ancient, or classical India ended up like this after the vedic period, even with the caste system, etc.
 
Last edited:
.
Yeh. Yeh. More bullshat. More Horseplay at Harappa.

"The Indus Valley Decipherment Hoax

MICHAEL WITZEL, a Harvard University Indologist, and STEVE FARMER, a comparative historian, report on media hype, faked data, and Hindutva propaganda in recent claims that the Indus Valley script has been decoded."


https://www.frontline.in/static/html/fl1720/17200040.htm

Why are you quoting 18 years old article, by an LINGUIST ???? (Published in year 2000).

What this article by Mr.Witzel has to do with the facts presented in the OP and the article quoted by me???

And that too for countering the facts presented by an renowned Archaeologist Prof. Shinde and Genealogist of Ancient DNA Dr.Niraj Rai.

Do you even know that Archaeology and Genealogy is proper science, but Linguist is not even considered as science?????

Mr.Witzel an linguist, in The article quoted by you was refuting the claims made towards Deciphering the Indus Script.

What it has do with Hard facts unearthed by Archaeology and Genetics?????

Your reply don't have substance nor depth to be even post a counter reply.

Any how carry on your propaganda and keep living in your lala land.
 
Last edited:
.
ancient Pakistani man skeleton found in mohnjodaro while he drinking soda and scratching his a$$:rofl::lol::enjoy::D:P
aHR0cDovL3d3dy5saXZlc2NpZW5jZS5jb20vaW1hZ2VzL2kvMDAwLzAwNC84OTUvb3JpZ2luYWwvMDkwOTE1LWFuY2llbnQtc2tlbGV0b24tMDIuanBn

Ungli karne ki qadeem riwayat

With that said... The notion of the, "out of India", theory is wrong.

There was an major incursion into India from C. Asia that brought about a four runner of Indo-Aryan religion and language.... And also genes...

However, an invasion isnt proven. Though, I wouldnt throw out the idea what so ever.

I do believe the Indus Val Civ did degrade and went back to rural communities by the time of the incursion. Because when C. Asians go to most places, they adopt the local customs, script, etc. for the most part which they did after the invasion of Mesopotamia, Anatolia, Greece, Egypt as well. To an extent this happened, but Indus valley script, architecture, planning, general sophistication was lost.

What ever happened in ancient India during and after the vedic period came out colorful to say the least and imagery-wise dont look like an offshot of C. Asia even though the language and the main religion being stemmed from there.

doAdW.jpg

03hiFv8.jpg

5cLHOrl.jpg

rvoiFDn.jpg

x79daeE.jpg

Ptq63.jpg

5yCfNsM.jpg

peUAWnR.jpg

5AbZRPa.jpg






There was a bizarre compromise of sorts if ancient, or classical India ended up like this after the vedic period, even with the caste system, etc.

Do you have the Technology to create These temples again?

How come you forgot magically how to machine carve solid Single Stone?
 
.
Ungli karne ki qadeem riwayat



Do you have the Technology to create These temples again?

How come you forgot magically how to machine carve solid Single Stone?

They're artificial caves created from simple tools. There's a lot of evidence of wooden architecture that was the most popular in those rock art.
 
.
They're artificial caves created from simple tools. There's a lot of evidence of wooden architecture that was the most popular in those rock art.

Nope. Simple Tools if could built These. You would still be building them.

Some artworks are almost 3d printed in Stone.

People who build those are long dead. You are just masquerading as them to Market These for tourism and greed.
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom