War is not an option,Pakistan ready for ‘conditional’ talks with India says Qureshi

[NA71]

Look at this.... Analogy to whom it may concerned

https://twitter.com/x/status/1168116320447188992

 

[prashantazazel]

the discrimination that was alive and well among the hindus BEFORE the partition is what drove Jinnah to do the partition in the first place...don't forget, that he was once the strongest ambassador of Muslim hindu unity. His experience with the hindus is what changed his mind. Also don't forget the elections in the mid 1930s when Jinnah and Muslim League lost and lost MISERABLY while the congress won an overwhelming majority...it was the following discrimination against Muslims on beef, against mosques, Azans, Islamic customs that caused to same Muslims to change their mind.

I agree Hindus were backward back then and didn't do much for coexistence. Were the Muslims progressive back then??

Anyhow, in a united India, you would have been the majority in a short time. And then the situation would be just like Malaysia. So indirectly, Mr. Jinnah did us a favour.

 

[Placemat]

Pakistan should be able to talk to anyone after the restrictions are lifted. However if any treason is committed by anyone from India , they should quickly be arrested again this time for good.

 

[GumNaam]

I agree Hindus were backward back then and didn't do much for coexistence. Were the Muslims progressive back then??

Anyhow, in a united India, you would have been the majority in a short time. And then the situation would be just like Malaysia. So indirectly, Mr. Jinnah did us a favour.

1. Most of the modern day secular laws stemmed from Islamic shariah, there is a reason why none other than the u.s. supreme court even honors The Holy Prophet pbuh on their walls...so that's muslims being progressive right there.
2. hindus were backwards then, they are backwards now.
3. If the partition had not happen, muslims even in present day Pakistan & Bangladesh would've been systematically eliminated with full legal cover, we wouldn't have had enough time to become majority.

 

[TheDarkKnight]

So basically if India is able to control Kashmir then Pakistan is willing to talk? What about loss of autonomy of Kashmir - we seem to have accepted that we can negotiate with India as long as violence is controlled by IA in Kashmir. Shah Mahmood is working on a completely different frequency than PM IK and sadly gives the impression that PMs speeches are only for internal consumption.

 

[Placemat]

1. Most of the modern day secular laws stemmed from Islamic shariah, there is a reason why none other than the u.s. supreme court even honors The Holy Prophet pbuh on their walls...so that's muslims being progressive right there.
2. hindus were backwards then, they are backwards now.
3. If the partition had not happen, muslims even in present day Pakistan & Bangladesh would've been systematically eliminated with full legal cover, we wouldn't have had enough time to become majority.

1. Progressive is a loose term. Islamic sharia could have been secular but is really not. Because state and religion should have nothing to do with each other. Problem with islam is that their religion is so vague that every one interprets it to his convenience.
2.Hindus were far more progressive always. Again a loose term.
3. Good that partition happened. Now we need the rest of the land to the west and will work towards it.

 

[GumNaam]

1. Progressive is a loose term. Islamic sharia could have been secular but is really not. Because state and religion should have nothing to do with each other. Problem with islam is that their religion is so vague that every one interprets it to his convenience.

I expected that answer from an ignorant illiterate who has never bothered to study Islam but was willing to give you the benefit of the doubt that perhaps you were educated enough to at least study it. But apparently you are as illiterate & ignorant as it gets.

2.Hindus were far more progressive always. Again a loose term.

rest assured that no one in the world considered anything about a practicing hindu as progressive unless he is a submissive, lungi wrapped who is unwilling to fight back & prefers to turn the other cheek. that type of hindu is the only type that the world considers as progressive.

3. Good that partition happened. Now we need the rest of the land to the west and will work towards it.

you've been working on it fit over 70 years and have failed resulting in sheer anger & frustration so brash & ugly that india has openly turned fascist & ugly that it has blatantly stated persecuting its own citizens. you'd be wise to give up all your dreams of the western land or we'll be more than willing to start welcoming ourselves into taking chunks out of the land to our east...not like india is in any condition to stop us.