What's new

Vietnam political collapse imminent: country messed up beyond repair

Translate to English:

Ho Chi Minh showed us the way to defeat the strongest nation in the World, and he also believed if young VNese study harder, then VN once day will become a great nation that can stand equally with the other powerful countries.

And unifying ASEAN region will be the best way for VN to become a supper power nation like Soviet-USA:P


So why do we need a so called " Democracy" when it's useless in helping VN to survive against China or US ???
The social turmoils is happening in your 'democracy' nation like you, not us. You're just merely an US's pawn, you can't possess any weapon of mass destruction to protect your own @$$ bcz USA will never allow your to have it. So, your tiny nation will be erase in few minutes when we decide to destroy you with nuclear-capable missile Shaddock , then we will take away all of your $$$$$ :P

LOL vietnam powerful my asssssssss the only powerful thing you guys can boast these days is begging
 
.
Gordon Chang as lost all credibility as a writer with is grab the thin air prediction that China would collapsed in 2006. Now he continue to make predictions with newer excused grab out of his a**. Anyone who believe his BS is a bonafide idiot.

G Chang will soon decided to change his career as a standup comedian or change his prediction to the collapse of vietnam. india ... which is more promising to rack up $ than playing his old jazz
 
.
LOL vietnam powerful my asssssssss the only powerful thing you guys can boast these days is begging
Hehe, Ho CHi Minh is the great man, he showed us the way to defeat mighty USA and he also believed that once day VN will become a supper power nation bcz he know young VNese can do it in the future

We already defeated China-USA to gain my freedom, so now, it's time for us to unify ASEAN and become a supper power like what Ho Chi Minh wished:P
 
.
OMG, there are still idiots here who believe that fxxked-up gordon g. chang???

That idiot has devoted his whole life to predict China's fall. I just feel so sorry for him. What a miserable punk.

China is collapsing in this year, ha ha. Vietnam will take back Guangxi and Guangdong.


The coming collapse of China: 1012.

In the middle of 2001, I predicted in my book, The Coming Collapse of China, that the Communist Party would fall from power in a decade, in large measure because of the changes that accession to the World Trade Organization (WTO) would cause. A decade has passed; the Communist Party is still in power. But don't think I'm taking my prediction back.
Why has China as we know it survived? First and foremost, the Chinese central government has managed to avoid adhering to many of its obligations made when it joined the WTO in 2001 to open its economy and play by the rules, and the international community maintained a generally tolerant attitude toward this noncompliant behavior. As a result, Beijing has been able to protect much of its home market from foreign competitors while ramping up exports.

By any measure, China has been phenomenally successful in developing its economy after WTO accession -- returning to the almost double-digit growth it had enjoyed before the near-recession suffered at the end of the 1990s. Many analysts assume this growth streak can continue indefinitely. For instance, Justin Yifu Lin, the World Bank's chief economist, believes the country can grow for at least two more decades at 8 percent, and the International Monetary Fund predicts China's economy will surpass America's in size by 2016.

Don't believe any of this. China outperformed other countries because it was in a three-decade upward supercycle, principally for three reasons. First, there were Deng Xiaoping's transformational "reform and opening up" policies, first implemented in the late 1970s. Second, Deng's era of change coincided with the end of the Cold War, which brought about the elimination of political barriers to international commerce. Third, all of this took place while China was benefiting from its "demographic dividend," an extraordinary bulge in the workforce.

Yet China's "sweet spot" is over because, in recent years, the conditions that created it either disappeared or will soon. First, the Communist Party has turned its back on Deng's progressive policies. Hu Jintao, the current leader, is presiding over an era marked by, on balance, the reversal of reform. There has been, especially since 2008, a partial renationalization of the economy and a marked narrowing of opportunities for foreign business. For example, Beijing blocked acquisitions by foreigners, erected new barriers like the "indigenous innovation" rules, and harassed market-leading companies like Google. Strengthening "national champion" state enterprises at the expense of others, Hu has abandoned the economic paradigm that made his country successful.

Second, the global boom of the last two decades ended in 2008 when markets around the world crashed. The tumultuous events of that year brought to a close an unusually benign period during which countries attempted to integrate China into the international system and therefore tolerated its mercantilist policies. Now, however, every nation wants to export more and, in an era of protectionism or of managed trade, China will not be able to export its way to prosperity like it did during the Asian financial crisis in the late 1990s. China is more dependent on international commerce than almost any other nation, so trade friction -- or even declining global demand -- will hurt it more than others. The country, for instance, could be the biggest victim of the eurozone crisis.

Third, China, which during its reform era had one of the best demographic profiles of any nation, will soon have one of the worst. The Chinese workforce will level off in about 2013, perhaps 2014, according to both Chinese and foreign demographers, but the effect is already being felt as wages rise, a trend that will eventually make the country's factories uncompetitive. China, strangely enough, is running out of people to move to cities, work in factories, and power its economy. Demography may not be destiny, but it will now create high barriers for growth.

At the same time that China's economy no longer benefits from these three favorable conditions, it must recover from the dislocations -- asset bubbles and inflation -- caused by Beijing's excessive pump priming in 2008 and 2009, the biggest economic stimulus program in world history (including $1 trillion-plus in 2009 alone). Since late September, economic indicators -- electricity consumption, industrial orders, export growth, car sales, property prices, you name it -- are pointing toward either a flatlining or contracting economy. Money started to leave the country in October, and Beijing's foreign reserves have been shrinking since September.

The Coming Collapse of China: 2012 Edition- By Gordon G. Chang | Foreign Policy
 
.
Hehe, Ho CHi Minh is the great man, he showed us the way to defeat mighty USA and he also believed that once day VN will become a supper power nation bcz he know young VNese can do it in the future

We already defeated China-USA to gain my freedom, so now, it's time for us to unify ASEAN and become a supper power like what Ho Chi Minh wished:P

Too much dreaming isn't good for you. :coffee:

As for your nation, the best solution is to improve ties with China and also to improve your living standard, too much ambition isn't suitable for you.
 
. . .
Too much western style democracy is not very good in under developed countries. It hinders development. Every country should chart its own course from their own situation, considering their own constraints. For countries like Vietnam and China, with essentially a system of single party state capitalism, I would recommend more democratization within the party itself, using internet voting, direct democracy etc., this way the party can become a much more effective team and reduce corruption and nepotism.

Western style multi party democracy is a failing model, I will go into more details about this in another thread. What we need in the west now is party less democracy, where only independents are allowed to run. Eventually countries with high internet access and penetration can move towards internet voting and direct democracy model for the masses and eventually kick out politicians from the system and just have hired bureaucrats selected/elected by people for limited terms. The current democratic model in the West have failed to protect the interest of 99% of the people of the West and it has been hurting global population as well. It is essentially a tool for greedy billionaires (1% elite) and it is also trashing the planetary environment. That is why you can see the Occupy Wall Street movement coming up, but the moneyed elite with media, judicial system and politicians in their pocket are too powerful to overthrow the current system at this point. So Mitt Romney may even win this election, using unlimited billions from the Super PACs, after the winning of Citizens United case, and specially if Eurozone collapses and there is another great economic downturn. Obama of course is also part of this same system, as both parties are controlled by 1% elite.

If China is able to successfully transition from a middle income to high income country and have a higher GDP than all Western countries (of European origin, US, EU, ANZ etc.) combined, only then there will be a systemic change in the West, and I think those will be dark days for a certain powerful ethno-religious group, who are now essentially dominating the current system, much to the detriment of 99% population of the planet.
 
.
So you admit you hate leftists, even though you are from a communist country. That's why your country is going to collapse. :) The contradictions are too big to cover up.

Vietnam is already a poor, hungry, violent, agent orange deformed country -- it will only get worse. Soon China will take back Hanoi and Cambodia will take back Saigon! Vietnam's superpower delusions about dominating SE Asia can't save you anymore.
:lol:
Isn't it the big plan of Deng Xiaoping and Pol Pot in the 1970s? Results everybody knew: we spank Deng and kicked asss Pol Pot. :lol:
 
. .
Nope, his mother is a White American, while he never considers himself Chinese. :coffee:

But he is 50% Chinese? Actually USA upbringing does that to people who are even 0% white. Its called peer pressure and cultural brainwashing. I have couple of cousins and some cousin-in-laws who are born and brought up in the US, but they are all wannabe whites, and feel insecure about their own origin. We call them coconut, brown outside and white inside, just like the term banana for asian-americans who are like this, yellow outside and white inside.
 
. . . .
Gordon G. Chang

Gordon G. Chang is a lawyer, author, and television pundit, best known for his book The Coming Collapse of China (2001), in which he argued that the hidden non-performing loans of the "Big Four" Chinese State banks would likely bring down China's financial system and its communist government and China would collapse in 2006. In Nuclear Showdown: North Korea Takes On the World (2006), Chang suggests that North Korea is most likely to target Japan, not South Korea. Chang suggests that North Korean nuclear ambitions could be forestalled if there was concerted multi-national diplomacy, with some "limits to patience" backed up by threat of an all-out Korean war.

220px-Gordon_G._Chang_May_24_2010.jpg


Chang graduated from Cornell University, where he was a member of the Quill and Dagger society, in 1973, and the Cornell Law School in 1976.
He is a regular contributor to The John Batchelor Show, The Glenn Beck Program on Fox News, and CNN. He also appeared as a special guest on Comedy Central's The Daily Show with Jon Stewart on July 17, 2006. On 3 February 2010, he appeared on Al Jazeera English and argued that China does not have a lot of economic leverage over the US, and it is actually the other way around. On November 24, 2010, he appeared on Imus in the Morning to discuss the Yeonpyeong bombing.
Chang was criticized after 2006 came and went with China only growing more and more powerful on the world stage. Chang continues to maintain that China is on the brink of collapse and that the people are one step away from revolution.[1] He also argues that China is a "new dot-com bubble", adding that the rapid growth by China is not supported by various internal factors such as decrease in population growth as well as slowing retail sales.[2] In a separate interview, he remarked that China achieved its 149.2% of its current trade surplus with the United States through "lying, cheating and stealing" and that if China decided to realise its threat that had been expressed since August 2007 to sell its US Treasuries, it would actually hurt its own economy which is reliant on exports to the United States, which economy would be hurt by the action given the nature of the global market.[3]

Gordon G. Chang - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom