What's new

Vietnam Defence Forum

My take on Trump and Vietnam / China is a bit different and the first insights that are already coming out about what he plans to do show that we should not think too much about many things that he said during the elections.

The loss of TPP will definitely be a loss for Vietnam, but in the geostrategic / military arena it will be different than what many people expect.

I think he will not be soft on China, but he will come from a very different perspective and that makes the whole difference. He will not come from the perspective that we are the big empire that wants to be in control of the planet and don't want any competitors. I think he will come from a more realistic, fair perspective as he said: "we want to get along with all those willing to get along with us". He is capable of working out agreements with Russia and China that respect everybody's interests in a reasonable manner, but if China is not willing to compromise or wants to take the US for a ride, he will not accept that and there will be conflict.

The Chinton / Obama administration with their aggressive actions to promote US empire created chaos in the middle east, moved towards conflict with Russia and pushed Russia into the arms of China, something that is not good for Vietnam. That stance also prompted China to move aggressively in SCS and as a result, we had the chinese land reclamation and other actions.

Trump will neutralised all that and restore the US / Russia relation to a more normal condition. He already reassured Korea about the alliance and his confidants said that he wants Japan to take a more active role against China. Trump is not a pushover or someone that you can play games with. He is very good at making deals and can negotiate and compromised a lot, but good luck if you try to screw him or renege on your agreements.

In trade he will be tough. Can't predict what will happen there.

@Silent Knight What's your take on this?
Donald Trump surprises all. the most remarkable thing I notice is he seems not to be the same man we know before. That is amazing. his speech after the election victory, his first interview to a media, his 100 day agenda, all the aggressive, loud and insulting rhetorics he used before are gone. He speaks more with softer tone, making thoughtful statements.

Though It is very difficult yet to predict what policy he intends for east Asia especially for Vietnam, but as you said it, I believe too, Trump will normalize the relationship to Russia. And that is not necessary a bad thing for Vietnam because Putin will likely reduce the country's dependence on China for security, money and friendship. We should look at the bright side.
 
Donald Trump surprises all. the most remarkable thing I notice is he seems not to be the same man we know before. That is amazing. his speech after the election victory, his first interview to a media, his 100 day agenda, all the aggressive, loud and insulting rhetorics he used before are gone. He speaks more with softer tone, making thoughtful statements.

Though It is very difficult yet to predict what policy he intends for east Asia especially for Vietnam, but as you said it, I believe too, Trump will normalize the relationship to Russia. And that is not necessary a bad thing for Vietnam because Putin will likely reduce the country's dependence on China for security, money and friendship. We should look at the bright side.

People have been misreading Trump big time. He can be nasty one day and super charming and diplomatic the next day. He adapts to the circumstances of the moment. All this talking that he is not presidential, or fit for it, etc, is incorrect and is done by people that don't really have a good understanding of the guy.

He is going to shake things up in Washington big time. I'm not saying that he is good or correct in everything, there is always a positive and a negative side. My feeling is that he is really going to confront China in a number of issues, but for real, not just talking like Obama. We'll see.
 
People have been misreading Trump big time. He can be nasty one day and super charming and diplomatic the next day. He adapts to the circumstances of the moment. All this talking that he is not presidential, or fit for it, etc, is incorrect and is done by people that don't really have a good understanding of the guy.

He is going to shake things up in Washington big time. I'm not saying that he is good or correct in everything, there is always a positive and a negative side. My feeling is that he is really going to confront China in a number of issues, but for real, not just talking like Obama. We'll see.
I myself thought recently he was just a polit clown. how wrong I was :D
a news on the nuclear front: I had hoped for. we will delay but not cancel it.

-----

Vietnam 'Suspends, Not Scraps' Deal With Russia to Build Country’s First NPP


12.11.2016 Sputnik

upload_2016-11-13_11-32-36.png

Picture: Students look at a model of a Russian nuclear-power plant on display at an exhibition held in Hanoi in 2012. Photo: Agence France-Presse/Getty Images


Earlier this week, the Vietnamese government announced its decision to scrap its plan to construct the first nuclear power plant in the country. The proposal is expected to be ratified by the National Assembly later this month.

The plan to build two NPPs in the central province of Ninh Thuan was ratified by the National Assembly in 2009. The government had chosen Russia’s nuclear energy company Rosatom and Japan Atomic Power Co. to build the plants.

Initially scheduled to start in 2014 and be completed by 2020, construction has been delayed several times since then. In 2010, Moscow and Hanoi signed an intergovernmental agreement on energy cooperation. The document included construction of the country’s first NPP, Ninh Thuan-1. The agreement also presumed a Russian state loan of $8 billion to fund the project.

However, it would be incorrect to say that Vietnam has abandoned plans to cooperate with Russia in nuclear energy, said Rafael Arutyunyan, deputy research director at the Nuclear Safety Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences. "Vietnam wanted to build two nuclear power plants, the first with Russia and the other with Japan. There were also talks about a third NPP, in cooperation with South Korea. It is completely incorrect to say now that Vietnam has scrapped a project with Russia. The situation is about revising the national nuclear energy plan," Arutyunyan said in an exclusive interview with Sputnik Vietnam.

The expert said there are several domestic reasons behind the decision of the Vietnamese government.

"First, it is economy. Two years ago, Vietnam saw acceleration in growth but now its economy is slowing down. As a result, energy consumption has decreased, and the government now does not expect a shortage in electricity," he pointed out. He added that now there is less money in Vietnam than two years ago, which also creates an additional obstacle for construction of an NPP.

"Second, despite the long-standing plans to build an NPP, Vietnam still lacks nuclear infrastructure and a legal framework to keep nuclear energy facilities operating. When a country wants to build its first NPP usually this is a very difficult and time-consuming process. Such a country needs a nuclear regulator to control all nuclear energy related operations. Well-trained personnel are also needed. Currently, Vietnam cannot match both requirements," Arutyunyan said.

However, because of the advantages of nuclear energy, including low production costs and the high level of environmental safety, the "Russia-Vietnamese project will be delayed, but not scrapped," he suggested.

Read more: https://sputniknews.com/business/201611121047371142-vietnam-russia-nuclear-energy/
 
Senior Chinese, Vietnamese leaders pledge to push forward comprehensive strategic cooperative partnership
2016-11-12 08:57 | Xinhua | Editor: Li Yan

Senior Chinese and Vietnamese leaders have pledged to push forward the bilateral comprehensive strategic cooperative partnership to a new level.

They made the pledge during a friendly official visit to Vietnam by Zhang Dejiang, member of the Standing Committee of the Political Bureau of the Communist Party of China (CPC) Central Committee, and chairman of the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress, China's top legislature.

At the invitation of his Vietnamese counterpart Nguyen Thi Kim Ngan, chairwoman of the National Assembly of Vietnam, who is also a member of the Political Bureau of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of Vietnam, Zhang arrived in Hanoi on Tuesday afternoon for a four-day friendly official visit to Vietnam which concluded on Friday.

During his visit in Hanoi, Zhang met with Nguyen Phu Trong, general secretary of the Communist Party of Vietnam (CPV) Central Committee, Vietnamese President Tran Dai Quang, Prime Minister Nguyen Xuan Phuc, and held talks with his Vietnamese counterpart Nguyen Thi Kim Ngan.

Zhang also briefed the Vietnamese leaders about the sixth plenary session of the 18th CPC Central Committee, held in Beijing late last month.

STRENGTHENING PARTY RELATIONS OF CRUCIAL IMPORTANCE TO BILATERAL TIES

In meeting with Trong, Zhang conveyed the greetings to Trong from Xi Jinping, general secretary of the CPC Central Committee. Zhang also spoke highly of achievements made by the party and state of Vietnam in recent years.

Zhang said both China and Vietnam are socialist countries under the Communist Party leadership, and it is of crucial importance to strengthen and deepen the relations between the two parties.

The Chinese side is ready to exert joint efforts with Vietnam to implement the important consensus reached by both party leaders, based on the 16-character motto of "friendly neighbourliness, comprehensive cooperation, durable stability and looking toward the future" as well as the "four good" spirit of "good neighbours, good friends, good comrades and good partners," said Zhang.

Zhang also called for both sides to carry on the traditional friendship, strengthen strategic guidance and the docking of development strategies, enrich the connotation of cooperation, enhance communications and consultation, eliminate the interferences, increase people to people exchanges, and constantly consolidate and deepen the Sino-Vietnam community of common destiny.

Trong said Vietnam's new party and state leadership attach great importance to the bilateral traditional friendship and comprehensive strategic cooperative partnership.

Vietnam will never forget China's non-selfish support in the past, and regard developing friendly ties with China as its "strategic choice and top priority in foreign policy," said the CPV general secretary.

Vietnam is ready to exert joint efforts with China, to enhance political mutual trust, expand pragmatic cooperation, properly control the differences, thus to carry on the bilateral traditional friendship from generations to generations, he added.

SINO-VIETNAM RELATIONS MAINTAIN POSITIVE DEVELOPMENT TREND

In meeting with Vietnamese President Tran Dai Quang in Hanoi on Wednesday, Zhang conveyed President Xi Jinping's greetings.

Zhang said, under the strategic guidance by the general secretaries of both parties, bilateral relationship, in overall, maintain positive development trend with the perception of "community of common destiny" gradually be rooted among people in both countries.

The two sides should grasp the correct development direction of bilateral ties, constantly consolidate the political, economic and social foundation, thus pushing forward the comprehensive strategic cooperative partnership to develop in a steady and healthy manner, said the top Chinese legislator.

The Vietnamese president asked Zhang to convey his greetings to Chinese President Xi Jinping and said his country value the traditional friendship with China and will exert all efforts to developing bilateral ties.

EXPLORING NEW HIGHLIGHTS OF PRAGMATIC COOPERATION

During his meeting with Vietnamese Prime Minister Nguyen Xuan Phuc, Zhang termed economic and trade cooperation as "important foundation" of bilateral ties.

In recent years, as pragmatic cooperation between the two countries maintain sound development in various areas, the two countries should make overall arrangements and well implement the cooperation projects, speed up the docking of the Belt and Road Initiative and Vietnam's "Two Corridors and One Economic Circle" plan, so as to bring about fruitful results to benefits both peoples.

The Vietnamese prime minister agreed with Zhang's suggestion, and said Vietnam is ready to seize the development opportunities, brought about by the docking of development strategies between the Belt and Road Initiative and "Two Corridors and One Economic Circle" plan, and constantly pushing forward the bilateral mutually-beneficial cooperation to a higher level.

SHARING EXPERIENCES IN PARTY BUILDING, GOVERNANCE AND LEGISLATIVE SUPERVISION

In meeting with his Vietnamese counterpart Nguyen Thi Kim Ngan, chairwoman of the National Assembly of Vietnam, Zhang said the two legislative bodies boast fruitful exchange and cooperation results since they established friendly ties 60 years ago.

Both sides should make it a priority to well implement the important consensus reached by both party chiefs, enhance friendly exchanges at all levels and all areas, and share experiences in party building, governance and legislative supervision, thus creating sound policy and law environment for economic and trade cooperation and personnel flow.

The Vietnamese top legislator pledged utmost efforts to safeguard the bilateral friendship and advance the comprehensive strategic cooperative partnership.

During the visit, Zhang also attended the Sino-Vietnam Friendly Cooperation Forum and the 3rd Sino-Vietnam Youth Festival in Hanoi.

Zhang concluded his visit and was back to Beijing on Friday.
 
Meet the First Ever Vietnamese-American Woman Elected to Congress

By Carl Samson
Posted on November 9, 2016
steph-murphy-e1478740982646.jpg


Democrat Stephanie Murphy, an educator, businesswoman, and former national security specialist is the first ever Vietnamese-American woman to be elected to the U.S. Congress.

Murphy unseated 12-term Republican representative John Mica with over 51% of the votes cast in Florida’s 7th Congressional District race.

She spoke of her victory (via Orlando Sentinel):

“When I entered this race, very few people thought we could win. We had a huge challenge ahead of us. We didn’t want to just make a difference. We wanted to make a point. That point is that this county is not going to tolerate dysfunction and deadlock. That every child should have a fair shot at the American dream.”

According to the local news, Murphy tied Mica to Donald Trump, whose inflammatory comments affected other Republicans during the campaign period. In TV ads, she criticized Mica for taking money from the National Rifle Association days after a nightclub massacre in Orlando.

Murphy’s family immigrated to the United States back when she was a one-year-old, according to NBC News. Her parents were blue-collar workers who cleaned office buildings at night to support their family. She is the first woman in her family to ever attend college, obtaining a B.A. in economics from the College of William and Mary and an M.S. in foreign service from Georgetown University.


upload_2016-11-13_13-34-18.png



upload_2016-11-13_13-33-48.png



In addition, she promised to “work with both Democrats and Republicans” and “always put people over politics.”

Meanwhile, Mica, who easily won the last 12 elections, conceded to Murphy on Tuesday night:

“It has been my honor to serve the district, state, and nation and I’m proud of my accomplishments both in Florida and in leadership positions in Congress.”

upload_2016-11-13_13-36-32.png
 
I myself thought recently he was just a polit clown. how wrong I was :D
a news on the nuclear front: I had hoped for. we will delay but not cancel it.

-----

Vietnam 'Suspends, Not Scraps' Deal With Russia to Build Country’s First NPP


12.11.2016 Sputnik

View attachment 351620
Picture: Students look at a model of a Russian nuclear-power plant on display at an exhibition held in Hanoi in 2012. Photo: Agence France-Presse/Getty Images


Earlier this week, the Vietnamese government announced its decision to scrap its plan to construct the first nuclear power plant in the country. The proposal is expected to be ratified by the National Assembly later this month.

The plan to build two NPPs in the central province of Ninh Thuan was ratified by the National Assembly in 2009. The government had chosen Russia’s nuclear energy company Rosatom and Japan Atomic Power Co. to build the plants.

Initially scheduled to start in 2014 and be completed by 2020, construction has been delayed several times since then. In 2010, Moscow and Hanoi signed an intergovernmental agreement on energy cooperation. The document included construction of the country’s first NPP, Ninh Thuan-1. The agreement also presumed a Russian state loan of $8 billion to fund the project.

However, it would be incorrect to say that Vietnam has abandoned plans to cooperate with Russia in nuclear energy, said Rafael Arutyunyan, deputy research director at the Nuclear Safety Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences. "Vietnam wanted to build two nuclear power plants, the first with Russia and the other with Japan. There were also talks about a third NPP, in cooperation with South Korea. It is completely incorrect to say now that Vietnam has scrapped a project with Russia. The situation is about revising the national nuclear energy plan," Arutyunyan said in an exclusive interview with Sputnik Vietnam.

The expert said there are several domestic reasons behind the decision of the Vietnamese government.

"First, it is economy. Two years ago, Vietnam saw acceleration in growth but now its economy is slowing down. As a result, energy consumption has decreased, and the government now does not expect a shortage in electricity," he pointed out. He added that now there is less money in Vietnam than two years ago, which also creates an additional obstacle for construction of an NPP.

"Second, despite the long-standing plans to build an NPP, Vietnam still lacks nuclear infrastructure and a legal framework to keep nuclear energy facilities operating. When a country wants to build its first NPP usually this is a very difficult and time-consuming process. Such a country needs a nuclear regulator to control all nuclear energy related operations. Well-trained personnel are also needed. Currently, Vietnam cannot match both requirements," Arutyunyan said.

However, because of the advantages of nuclear energy, including low production costs and the high level of environmental safety, the "Russia-Vietnamese project will be delayed, but not scrapped," he suggested.

Read more: https://sputniknews.com/business/201611121047371142-vietnam-russia-nuclear-energy/

I think the determining issue for the nuclear plants is cost. The reason for the cancellation is because the cost doubled as a consequence of revisions done after the Fukushima disaster, so unless the cost factor changes, I doubt it will ever happen, but we'll see. I'd like to see the new bigger research reactor going forward.
 
I think the determining issue for the nuclear plants is cost. The reason for the cancellation is because the cost doubled as a consequence of revisions done after the Fukushima disaster, so unless the cost factor changes, I doubt it will ever happen, but we'll see. I'd like to see the new bigger research reactor going forward.
yes the fukushima disaster has changed everything, and increased massively the costs for constructions and safety measures. too much for the government budget. but I believe the fundings were secured because Russia and Japan promised to finance the plants by cheap loans. even if now the total cost increases, both Russia and Japan are willing to provide more money. Anyway that is now a thing out of reach if the parliement imposes a lower debt ceiling for the coming years. the germans decided to completely shutdown all nuclear power plants and turn to green energy, an U-turn, nobody had expected before fukushima.

you mean the 2 new planned $500 million nuclear research centres, one in Hanoi, one in Dalat, 15MW each? from the news, they are under construction and expected to be completed in 2020, though there are no pictures available to public. I think the plants are sensitive if not a no go area for common folks.

this one is the exising nuclear research centre in Dalat.
da-lat-nuclear-research-institute-853.jpeg
 
yes the fukushima disaster has changed everything, and increased massively the costs for constructions and safety measures. too much for the government budget. but I believe the fundings were secured because Russia and Japan promised to finance the plants by cheap loans. even if now the total cost increases, both Russia and Japan are willing to provide more money. Anyway that is now a thing out of reach if the parliement imposes a lower debt ceiling for the coming years. the germans decided to completely shutdown all nuclear power plants and turn to green energy, an U-turn, nobody had expected before fukushima.

you mean the 2 new planned $500 million nuclear research centres, one in Hanoi, one in Dalat, 15MW each? from the news, they are under construction and expected to be completed in 2020, though there are no pictures available to public. I think the plants are sensitive if not a no go area for common folks.

this one is the exising nuclear research centre in Dalat.
da-lat-nuclear-research-institute-853.jpeg

Yes, I meant those 2 research reactors.

The problem with the increased cost of building the nuclear plants is that is not only that the cost of construction has increased, but as the head of the Vietnamese electrical company said, the cost of the electricity produced by the plants has also become too high and is no longer competitive with other power sources and that's actually the main reason why they are canceling the projects.
 
Yes, I meant those 2 research reactors.

The problem with the increased cost of building the nuclear plants is that is not only that the cost of construction has increased, but as the head of the Vietnamese electrical company said, the cost of the electricity produced by the plants has also become too high and is no longer competitive with other power sources and that's actually the main reason why they are canceling the projects.
Looks to be. There is no other option than stopping the program. One nuclear power plant with total capacity of 4,400 MW for $18 billions is too crazy to go ahead. As the government previously agreed to have 2 plants, one from Russia, one from Japan, both would cost $36 billions. Simply nuts. Coal fired power plants with similar capacity cost a fraction of the sum.

Just reading the news. The parliament has approved pulling the plug. Too bad, we can also scrap many investments that were made for the plants in advance. The higher cost comes because Vietnam wants a higher security standard after Fukushima as one official reveals.

I think both the Russians and Japanese aren't amused.
 
Looks to be. There is no other option than stopping the program. One nuclear power plant with total capacity of 4,400 MW for $18 billions is too crazy to go ahead. As the government previously agreed to have 2 plants, one from Russia, one from Japan, both would cost $36 billions. Simply nuts. Coal fired power plants with similar capacity cost a fraction of the sum.

Just reading the news. The parliament has approved pulling the plug. Too bad, we can also scrap many investments that were made for the plants in advance. The higher cost comes because Vietnam wants a higher security standard after Fukushima as one official reveals.

I think both the Russians and Japanese aren't amused.

Yes, safety first, an small country like Vietnam can't afford a Fukushima.
 
Broken rules at $11 bln Formosa mill triggered Vietnam spill, report says
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/wires/reuters/article-3932792/Broken-rules-11-bln-Formosa-triggered-Vietnam-spill-report-says.html
By Reuters

Published: 23:00 GMT, 13 November 2016 | Updated: 23:00 GMT, 13 November 2016

By Jess Macy Yu and Faith Hung

HONG KONG/TAIPEI, Nov 14 (Reuters) - More than 50 violations at a steel mill run by Taiwan's Formosa Plastics Group, including the unauthorised use of a dirtier production process, led to Vietnam's worst environmental disaster, according to an internal government report.

The July report, reviewed by Reuters, is the first official document to emerge publicly since the April accident, when a toxic leak sullied over 200 km (125 miles) of coastline, killed more than 100 tonnes of fish and left thousands jobless.

After months of popular outrage against both the Hanoi government and one of the communist state's largest investors, Formosa agreed in June to pay $500 million in compensation.

The report, signed by Vietnam's environment minister and written after consultation with an unidentified panel of international experts, said Formosa did not keep to production plans agreed in original environmental assessments made for the $10.6 billion project.

Begun in 2008, the plant was still ramping up at the time of the spill and working at less than 25 percent of total capacity, according to a Formosa Ha Tinh Steel official.

But it was not using the processing system agreed with Hanoi authorities, the report said.

Formosa was using 'wet' coking - a system which uses water for cooling and is considered more polluting, as it generates more emissions and wastewater containing compounds including cyanide.

The alternative 'dry' process, widely used in modern plants, is costlier and does not use water. That proved critical when a power cut disabled the plant's waste processing equipment, spilling contaminated water into the sea, according to the report.

Formosa officials agreed it was using the dirtier process but said it had until 2019 to switch to cleaner methods.

"We are following their instructions and trying our very best to do what is required," Formosa Ha Tinh Steel (FHS) executive vice president Chang Fu-ning told Reuters.

Vietnam's Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment did not respond to written questions and requests for comment on the report or the plant.

Chang said Formosa had rectified 45 of 53 violations cited since the July report. Seven more will be fixed by the end of the month he said, without giving details.

The plant was now scheduled to begin full commercial production in the first quarter of 2017, subject to approvals, Chang added.

RESTARTING?

Thousands of people from the affected regions have criticised the government for its handling of the disaster and the payment of compensation, and accused the police of heavy-handed measures to break up demonstrations sparked by the spill.

In a rare criticism from an active parliamentarian, Tran Cong Thuat, Deputy Secretary of the Provincial Party Committee of Quang Binh, one of four affected provinces, said this month that everything would be need to be "clear" before FHS scaled up.

"No one (from the government) has ever stepped up to take responsibility over the illegal discharge by Formosa," he said in televised comments. "If the issue is not made clear and violations are not resolved, we must resolutely not let Formosa operate."

Formosa has plans to expand the steel plant to become the biggest of its kind in Southeast Asia, including a deepwater port and 1,500-megawatt thermal power complex.

Vietnamese Prime Minister Nguyen Xuan Phuc has threatened to close down the Formosa plant if there is a repeat.

The report said Formosa's failures included omitting a planned water storage dam, a measure which according to experts could have kept tainted water out of the sea even during a power outage.

FHS's Chang said the company had committed to build a facility to gather and hold waste water.

Friedhelm Schroeder, an academic who was among a group of foreign experts invited by the Vietnam government to assess the damage, said experts had identified other failings.

"What the company should have done was shut off all the production of coke, so the toxic substance would not reach the sewage plant," said Schroeder, from the Institute Coastal Research in Germany.

An FHS official declined to comment on that aspect and the report by the foreign experts has not been made public.

The lack of information released about the accident has galvanised many Vietnamese and mobilised demonstrators on a scale not seen before in the controlled, one-party state that tolerates little dissent.

Anger and mistrust mounted after the government initially said the mass fish deaths could be the result of "red tide", when algae blooms and produces toxins, or a release of toxic chemicals by humans, but there was nothing linking FHS to it.

"We see there is some cover up for Formosa, which is completely opposite from governments in other countries," said Bishop Nguyen Thai Hop, the head of the Catholic community in several provinces which have been fighting to protect the environment.

"Until now Formosa and the government haven't used any advanced technology to clean up the Vietnamese sea, and haven't been able to say when the central region's sea will be clean as before."

A state television broadcast last week highlighted how the government was reimbursing seafood businesses and promoting tourism in areas affected by the spill.

The Labor Ministry estimates some 263,000 workers have been impacted by the Formosa incident, including nearly 40,000 workers in the four provinces directly affected. (Writing by Clara Ferreira Marques; Editing by Lincoln Feast)
 
The man who will likely lead the Navy under Trump means business in the South China Sea
http://www.businessinsider.com/randy-forbes-navy-trump-south-china-sea-2016-11
22531910889_ac6136df3a_k.jpg
A family enjoys Gator Beach as an Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer is underway off the coast of Southern California. US Navy/Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Timothy M. Black

When President-elect Donald Trump spoke about expanding the Navy to 350 ships in his September national security speech, he's most likely taking his cues from Randy Forbes, the Republican Congressman from Virginia poised to take over as Secretary of the Navy in a Trump administration.

“The 350-ship navy, cruiser modernization – those naval planks [in Donald Trump’s policies] are lifted from Randy Forbes,” a source familiar with the matter told USNI News.

The president appoints a Secretary of the Navy to "conduct, all affairs of the Department of the Navy," which includes the Marine Corps. Trump, during his speech, said he wants to greatly increase the size of both the Navy and the Marines, and to generally "rebuild our military."

Additionally, Trump mentioned buying newer destroyers to bulk up the Navy's fleet of 272 ships, most likely with Zumwalt class destroyers, but the Navy has struggled so far to field those.

Forbes, a military adviser to Trump during his campaign, serves as a senior member of the House Armed Services Committee, and makes it plain on his website that he is "one of the nation’s most forceful advocates for a strong national defense."

In September, Forbes asserted before Congress that "more than rhetoric is required to counterbalance China’s growing military power and assertiveness," referring to China's artificial island building and militarization in the South China Sea, as well as China ignoring an international court ruling that said its claims in the region were illegal.

China has declared "no fly" and "no sail" zones in international waters in the Pacific that have gone unchallenged by the US in the last few years. Increasingly Beijing bullies ships from its neighbors, some of whom are US allies.

f-35c-zumwalt.jpg
An F-35 Lightning II Carrier Variant (CV) piloted by U.S. Marine Corps Maj. Robert “Champ” Guyette II, a test pilot from the F-35 Pax River Integrated Test Force (ITF) assigned to the Salty Dogs of Air Test and Evaluation Squadron (VX) 23, flies over the stealth guided-missile destroyer USS Zumwalt (DDG 1000) as the ship transits the Chesapeake Bay on Oct. 17, 2016. US Navy/Andy Wolfe

In September 2015, Forbes wrote a letter urging Obama to increase the Navy's presence in the region, and has been bullish on the prospect of projecting power in the South China Sea for some time.

Forbes has advocated an increased US presence in the region, as well as modernizing and increasing the size of the Navy's fleet as China makes spectacular progress in updating its own navy.
 
Yes, safety first, an small country like Vietnam can't afford a Fukushima.
No we can't afford such a nuclear disaster in Vietnam. But worse, if our enemy runs amok, threatening or even resorting to nuclear weapons. We should have the capability to revenge. I think the best thing to go now is developing a cheaper variant of nuclear power plants, and later build them by ourselves. We will have advanced nuclear research complex in a few years. We don't start by zero. we have personal that are being trained in Russia and Japan. No need to mention Nuclear power plants produce a byproduct that is necessary for nuclear weapon: plutonium.
 
I think I have brush up a bit about Nuclear Energy. Nuclear Fission is very risky, Vietnam gov should look into Nuclear fusion. It's just me but I still think Vietnam should have the greatest and latest tech that put safety always first. A lot to ask for Vietnam but people have to work together to make this happen.

The man who will likely lead the Navy under Trump means business in the South China Sea
http://www.businessinsider.com/randy-forbes-navy-trump-south-china-sea-2016-11
22531910889_ac6136df3a_k.jpg
A family enjoys Gator Beach as an Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer is underway off the coast of Southern California. US Navy/Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Timothy M. Black

When President-elect Donald Trump spoke about expanding the Navy to 350 ships in his September national security speech, he's most likely taking his cues from Randy Forbes, the Republican Congressman from Virginia poised to take over as Secretary of the Navy in a Trump administration.

“The 350-ship navy, cruiser modernization – those naval planks [in Donald Trump’s policies] are lifted from Randy Forbes,” a source familiar with the matter told USNI News.

The president appoints a Secretary of the Navy to "conduct, all affairs of the Department of the Navy," which includes the Marine Corps. Trump, during his speech, said he wants to greatly increase the size of both the Navy and the Marines, and to generally "rebuild our military."

Additionally, Trump mentioned buying newer destroyers to bulk up the Navy's fleet of 272 ships, most likely with Zumwalt class destroyers, but the Navy has struggled so far to field those.

Forbes, a military adviser to Trump during his campaign, serves as a senior member of the House Armed Services Committee, and makes it plain on his website that he is "one of the nation’s most forceful advocates for a strong national defense."

In September, Forbes asserted before Congress that "more than rhetoric is required to counterbalance China’s growing military power and assertiveness," referring to China's artificial island building and militarization in the South China Sea, as well as China ignoring an international court ruling that said its claims in the region were illegal.

China has declared "no fly" and "no sail" zones in international waters in the Pacific that have gone unchallenged by the US in the last few years. Increasingly Beijing bullies ships from its neighbors, some of whom are US allies.

f-35c-zumwalt.jpg
An F-35 Lightning II Carrier Variant (CV) piloted by U.S. Marine Corps Maj. Robert “Champ” Guyette II, a test pilot from the F-35 Pax River Integrated Test Force (ITF) assigned to the Salty Dogs of Air Test and Evaluation Squadron (VX) 23, flies over the stealth guided-missile destroyer USS Zumwalt (DDG 1000) as the ship transits the Chesapeake Bay on Oct. 17, 2016. US Navy/Andy Wolfe

In September 2015, Forbes wrote a letter urging Obama to increase the Navy's presence in the region, and has been bullish on the prospect of projecting power in the South China Sea for some time.

Forbes has advocated an increased US presence in the region, as well as modernizing and increasing the size of the Navy's fleet as China makes spectacular progress in updating its own navy.

President Donald Trump will send more US Navies to that area. Trump wouldn't back down by the Chinese.
 
I think I have brush up a bit about Nuclear Energy. Nuclear Fission is very risky, Vietnam gov should look into Nuclear fusion. It's just me but I still think Vietnam should have the greatest and latest tech that put safety always first. A lot to ask for Vietnam but people have to work together to make this happen.



President Donald Trump will send more US Navies to that area. Trump wouldn't back down by the Chinese.
nuclear energy is certainly risky, more risky than let say coal powered plant. actually risk exists everywhere, it is question of controlling risk. even going over any street in Vietnam is risky. you know what I mean :D

hundred of years ago when gunpowder was invented in China, everyone feared of the devil stuff. until someone invented the most powerful weapon of human history till then: weapons filled by gunpowder. look at this: made in Vietnam hand guns, cannon and artillery during Dai Viet period of 14 century, displayed at Vietnam military museum.
upload_2016-11-14_17-0-0.png





upload_2016-11-14_16-59-8.png


upload_2016-11-14_16-59-31.png
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom