What's new

Video shows army personnel shooting unarmed man in Kashmir.

one question to pakistanis , why would the indian army kill a civilian they are trying to get out of the rubble ? Why ? why would that make sense ? If indian army was doing that in kashmir then almost all kashmiris would have been dead by now .They would not kill an innocent civilian under the rubble .what motive would make them do that ?
 
No one is crying for the human rights violation that happened in Srilanka during anti LTTE ops (not even we cried).
No one is crying abt our burgeoning headache due to influx of refugees from Bangaladesh.

But when it comes to Kashmir, any drop of hat is exaggerated and sympathy flows from across the borders.
What have we done?....If Srilanka is not worried about killing the separatists and not caring abt their human "rights" then why so much attention to India yaar??

Its a fight against terrorism, here human rights doesnt come, only "Devil rights" for these idiots...
 
OHH boy what I really meant to say or to show that the way your soldiers treat your citizens thats it. now it hardly matters what kind of punishment you guys are giving to the culprit as that video shows how your soldiers treats you they are nothing else just mafias in uniform.

and why should we punish our soldiers for killing a terrorist.

And why does our soldiers become a mafia in uniform and yours is a saint. Stupid utter stupid. Try again please.
 
Dont troll .... coz u can try all u want to derail this thread ... but it wont change anything... keep whining...


Death to the occupation of IOK.

A simple, very relevant question for all those who have tears in their eyes after watching this video.

Last year similar video of Pakistani army killing blindfolded, unarmed hand cuffed men was released ..how did you guys react then..what did you do about it(other than claiming, that it was a fake video) ?

If you can not answer this question (ie you do not have empathy for your own countrymen) ..then you are exposing hypocrisy and crocodile tears by being on this thread.
 
Clearly posting a video of an army shooting a man is put on here to provoke anger and hatred from both sides and its showing on here. Hoping the moderators do the right thing on here
 
how can u prove that he was not holding grenade ?
if u watch the video carefully u will notice before shooting all soldiers scattered now if they wanted a cold blooded murder they would have done that when they saw him but why soldiers with gun will scatter and start shouting after some time ( if they wanted a cold blooded murder they would have done that when they saw him) before shooting him
so there is only one explanation that is army men saw a men rapped in rubble they try to help him but when they saw his hand with grenade they first scattered to save them self and when they got the chance they shot him watch the video again
 
A simple, very relevant question for all those who have tears in their eyes after watching this video.

Last year similar video of Pakistani army killing blindfolded, unarmed hand cuffed men was released ..how did you guys react then..what did you do about it(other than claiming, that it was a fake video) ?

If you can not answer this question (ie you do not have empathy for your own countrymen) ..then you are exposing hypocrisy and crocodile tears by being on this thread.

First of all this is not even a thread about Pakistan army so nice try at trolling. And secondly the thread is still there about that particular incident and so are the answers to the questions that you are asking. Please stop going off topic.

---------- Post added at 08:39 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:38 PM ----------

how can u prove that he was not holding grenade ?
if u watch the video carefully u will notice before shooting all soldiers scattered now if they wanted a cold blooded murder they would have done that when they saw him but why soldiers with gun will scatter and start shouting after some time ( if they wanted a cold blooded murder they would have done that when they saw him) before shooting him
so there is only one explanation that is army men saw a men rapped in rubble they try to help him but when they saw his hand with grenade they first scattered to save them self and when they got the chance they shot him watch the video again

All wild assumptions.
 
how can u prove that he was not holding grenade ?
if u watch the video carefully u will notice before shooting all soldiers scattered now if they wanted a cold blooded murder they would have done that when they saw him but why soldiers with gun will scatter and start shouting after some time ( if they wanted a cold blooded murder they would have done that when they saw him) before shooting him
so there is only one explanation that is army men saw a men rapped in rubble they try to help him but when they saw his hand with grenade they first scattered to save them self and when they got the chance they shot him watch the video again


And why didnt tht man explode the grenade instead of waiting to get shot?


Do u think tht he had forgotten how to pull the pin and trigger the explosives? LOL and was probably reading a manual during the long pause!
 
Shot in the face. Just the way all the terrorist scum should be killed:tup:
 
Ok my question still stands. I have a poor eye site so help me guys you indians are good at IT editing and all the other stuff. Please some one post the picture of a grenade from the damn video so I can agree with yall.

Not required.Concentrate on the audio.Assuming you comprehend Hindi;

0:12 "Tereho Nikaal denge..."

0:17 "Aaram Se,Aaram Se..."

0:25 "Haan,Nikaal rahe hai..."

Suddenly and out of context;

0:45 "Rukko,Rukko..."

And finally

0:48 "Maar De,Maar De"


Now the last two sentences were delivered in a deadly serious pitch,it is quite apparent that the Jawans saw something that was a threat.

If killing the guy was the intention,the Jawans could have resorted to shooting through the rubble and fishing the body out later as opposed to clearing the rubble first.
 
And why does our soldiers become a mafia in uniform and yours is a saint. Stupid utter stupid. Try again please.

Because your soldiers were killing a civillian(proved) while ours were killing a terrorist in a terror prone state(if that guy is not a terrorist then the soldier will be punished but our army and GOI will never say this openly) .
And one more thing don't get to the personel level as per the forum rule you cannot use words like stupid or anything else for any member.
 
BS

Read the number u liar..:


Thousands protest killing in Indian-held Kashmir - Asia, World - The Independent

Thousands protest killing in Indian-held Kashmir - Arab News
http://www.google.com.au/url?sa=t&s...ieGsAg&usg=AFQjCNE7hxWo0Dh02WbQNCqDyUnRgSxRrg



80000 still missing.............. 2156 unidentified as of yet... 574 identified frm the mass graves... do the math /..... u claim 2000 bodies?

You are pulling numbers from random articles on the net .

I an getting you numbers from Jammu and kashmir state human rights commission which says only 2000 graves have been found and nearly 50000 people have been killed . This is the real authentic stuff .

Your own pakistani members have been posting this around the forum .

Over 2,000 found buried in Kashmir's unmarked graves - report, IBN Live News
 
Not required.Concentrate on the audio.Assuming you comprehend Hindi;

0:12 "Tereho Nikaal denge..."

0:17 "Aaram Se,Aaram Se..."

0:25 "Haan,Nikaal rahe hai..."

Suddenly and out of context;

0:45 "Rukko,Rukko..."

And finally

0:48 "Maar De,Maar De"


Now the last two sentences were delivered in a deadly serious pitch,it is quite apparent that the Jawans saw something that was a threat.

If killing the guy was the intention,the Jawans could have resorted to shooting through the rubble and fishing the body out later as opposed to clearing the rubble first.

Still where is the grenade. Not even in their conversation. Not a single one said oye dekh kay phat jayega.
 
First of all this is not even a thread about Pakistan army so nice try at trolling. And secondly the thread is still there about that particular incident and so are the answers to the questions that you are asking. Please stop going off topic.

---------- Post added at 08:39 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:38 PM ----------



All wild assumptions.
its not assumption that they didnt kill the person at first sight
its not assumption that they they asked him "kaha se hai tu"
its not assumption that they they scattered to save them self
its not assumption that they they shouted

now u tell me why this person wasnt killed at first sight if they wanted to murder him?
answer this question with proper logic i will leave this forum
 
Still where is the grenade. Not even in their conversation. Not a single one said oye dekh kay phat jayega.

oh come on .They did not have that much time to discuss the grenade . from the conversation it was clear and if you carefully see his fist in the video after his hand comes out , you will see it .
 

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom