What's new

Video breaks down unbelievable progress in China’s high-speed rail system: ‘What are we doing in the US?’

beijingwalker

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Nov 4, 2011
Messages
65,195
Reaction score
-55
Country
China
Location
China

Video breaks down unbelievable progress in China’s high-speed rail system: ‘What are we doing in the US?’​

Mike Taylor
Tue, October 3, 2023 at 5:30 PM GMT+8
fefbb54060813e5fde4a5215cd3c8b70


Public transportation in cities across the United States leaves a lot to be desired.

The situation is even more frustrating when compared to China, specifically the country’s high-speed rail system.

TikToker Rob Jones (@tvmeteorologist) shared a map of the network in December, noting how it had expanded exponentially since 2008.

“What are we doing in the U.S.?” Jones said.

China opened its first high-speed train, between Beijing and Tianjin, in 2008. Now, the lines span 25,000 miles. The system is projected to stretch to 31,000 miles by 2025 and more than 124,000 miles by 2035, according to the South China Morning Post.

CNN noted the U.S. has only one high-speed rail, the Acela route in Amtrak’s Northeast corridor, which runs from Boston to Washington, D.C., or 457 miles.

China’s high-speed trains have set records, but mostly travel up to 217 miles per hour. CNN reported that “intercity travel has been transformed, and the dominance of airlines has been broken on the busiest routes,” as 75% of cities with a population of 500,000 had a high-speed train link by 2020.

There are 37 cities in the U.S. that meet that mark. China has 145 cities with more than a million people.

In 2018, the Environmental and Energy Study Institute listed a handful of reasons for America’s lack of high-speed rail development, including an emphasis on driving, the difficulty of shifting to public transit with infrastructure designed for automobiles, and political interference by “extremely wealthy individuals who want to suppress interest in railroads to maximize fossil fuel use.”

California is building a 500-mile high-speed rail from the Bay Area to the Los Angeles Basin, but it won’t be completed until 2033. The first section of the route, 171 miles in the Central Valley, is expected to be done by 2028. A later phase of the project will extend it to Sacramento and San Diego.

The first “true” high-speed train in the country could trek from Las Vegas to Southern California.

Texas is also exploring a line from Houston to Dallas, but the idea has been beset by problems.

High-speed trains are “the single largest climate solution that can decarbonize the majority of our transportation network quickly,” according to the U.S. High Speed Rail Association. The International Union of Railways showed that even commuter trains are far more efficient than buses, cars, and planes, and they produce far less carbon dioxide pollution than cars and planes.

A 2021 study showed China’s stunning rails reduced vehicle-produced air pollution. The authors noted the country could fully realize the benefits of high-speed trains by using greener electricity.

Some TikTokers pointed out that public transportation puts exorbitant costs on the government, though others noted the priorities of such officials are out of whack.

“This is what happens when your budget goes to the military instead of the country itself,” one user wrote.

Another said: “But if we spend our tax money on infrastructure how will the ruling class keep their yachts afloat? It’s a serious problem we all must solve.”

Someone else said: “The public transport/infrastructure is the only viable criticism of America tbh. We really need to step up our game there.”

One user echoed a solution to a problem noted by the EESI: “[The U.S.] has more tracks via freight tracks. Just a matter of putting passenger trains on them.”

 
.
Post profits of high speed rail comrade

Also post balance sheet
 
.
Post profits of high speed rail comrade

Also post balance sheet
Are public facilities for profits only? not in China. China cares more about what those HSR can benefit the local eonomies as a whole, you Indians can never see anything beyond the tip of your nose, this is why you can never get long term meaningful development.
 
.
Are public facilities for profits only? not in China. China cares more about what those HSR can benefit the local eonomies as a whole, you Indians can never see anything beyond the tip of your nose, this is why you can never get long term meaningful development.
Yes loss making debt fueled infrastructure. Nothing benefits a local economy more.

(If it was useful it would be profitable)
 
.
Yes loss making debt fueled infrastructure. Nothing benefits a local economy more.

(If it was useful it would be profitable)
China is loaded with money and we lend money around the world, we know you need to invest money to make money, you Indians can never see anything beyond the tip of your nose, this is why you can never get long term meaningful development.

 
Last edited:
.
There's no hope for public transport in USA, because the city and transportation system were designed differently.

USA is more focused on highways and owning a private car, maybe a taxi is preferable.

Basically comparing USA vs other countries is kinda useless.

USA transportation system is perfect but in different way.
 
.
There's no hope for public transport in USA, because the city and transportation system were designed differently.

USA is more focused on highways and owning a private car, maybe a taxi is preferable.

Basically comparing USA vs other countries is kinda useless.

USA transportation system is perfect but in different way.
but dirty commies think its be a good idea to build bullet trains from west to east coast

dirty commies will never understand how america infrastructure works and how americans travel
 
.
There's no hope for public transport in USA, because the city and transportation system were designed differently.

USA is more focused on highways and owning a private car, maybe a taxi is preferable.

Basically comparing USA vs other countries is kinda useless.

USA transportation system is perfect but in different way.
I don't know what you are talking about, US public transport is very inconvenient and backward. China has more private cars and highways than US, but it doesn't deprive the people from the choice of advanced public modes of transport.
 
.
China is loaded with money and we lend money around the world, we know you need to invest money to make money

How are those CPEC projects in Pakistan coming out ?
Or the Hambonta port in Sri Lanka ?
 
.
How are those CPEC projects in Pakistan coming out ?
Or the Hambonta port in Sri Lanka ?
Pretty well I guess, besides, how foreign projects fare in foreign countries are not China's responsibilities. China is only solely responsible for China and Chinese people.
 
.
Building railways or HSR in case of China is never a bad thing. Depends on RoI but surely in the long run it will pay dividends. The Chinese Laos HSR might have a poor ROI today but with connectivity to Thailand and onwards to Malaysia, that’ll have a multiplier effect.

Wrt to CPEC, most of the hydropower and wind power projects that have been completed and are essentially a success. The investments in coal power with collusion of the corrupt politicians that resulted in investments that make no economic sense.

Personally, CPEC in energy area, should focus on hydropower only and in transport, focus on ML1 railways only.
 
.
Post profits of high speed rail comrade

Also post balance sheet

China and Chinese in general, from historical point of view, always thinks long-terms, and their philosophy is quite different to the US. The US is rich (at least on paper), but their thinking is truly from a young nation, like a spoiled child of a rich family who believes he knows everything, but he does not.

If India wants to progress, it needs to adopt Chinese way of thinking and philosophy in how to develop a country in long term, not from a mentally under-developed country like the US, regardless of how much it hates China.
 
Last edited:
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom