Verbal divorce has no legal value, SC tells petitioner

[TheLahoriGuy]

verbal is not enough everything on females someone need to nuke them for only cup of tea

Aap Kay lafzon main chuppay huay dukh nazar aatay hain.

 

[Imran Khan]

Aap Kay lafzon main chuppay huay dukh nazar aatay hain.

Truth sir truth

 

[El Sidd]

How can you”verbally” annul a contract?

In many parts of the world a verbal agreement is legally binding.

 

[Wolfhunter]

In many parts of the world a verbal agreement is legally binding.

Yes, but we are talking about Pakistan at the moment are we not? Not "many parts of the world". There are "many" things different about the "many" parts of the world.

 

[El Sidd]

Yes, but we are talking about Pakistan at the moment are we not? Not "many parts of the world". There are "many" things different about the "many" parts of the world.

The law is soundly written but badly interpreted.

 

[Ocean]

"The SC rejected the man's petition, saying that receiving monthly expenditure after divorce is the woman's right."

What rubbish is this? How is it supposed to be his effing business after divorce? Haq e mehr is given for a reason.

Pehlay hee yeh pakistani aurtain apnay rishtay daron ko gifts denay kay leeay shohron ko khub looti hain phir gold jewellary say shohron ko lootna. Aur phir bhi pait na bharay tau dovorce kay baad bhi expenditure unless its the expenditure for mans kids.

Seriously women nowadays in all parts of world have become conniving gold digger ******