What's new

Uttarakhand: big and unusual role for the Air Force's C-130J

Hulk

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Sep 13, 2009
Messages
7,582
Reaction score
-18
Country
United States
Location
United States
Uttarakhand: big and unusual role for the Air Force's C-130J | NDTV.com

Dharasu/Hindon Air Base: In a very innovative, yet daring move, the Indian Air Force (IAF) today virtually established an aviation fuel supply bridge at Dharasu in Uttarkashi to give greater impetus to rescue operations that have been severely restricted due to non-availability of aviation fuel in the upper reaches of Uttarakhand.

With the road connectivity to Uttarkashi completely broken down, bad weather adversely affecting launch of flying operations from Jolly Grant airfield in Dehradun and the renewed threat of rains - likely to hit the state on June 24 - an out-of-the-box solution seemed to be the only option to sustain rescue operations.

Going by the lay of the land, it was decided to examine the possibility of using the small air strip at Dharasu to establish a forward launch base for rescue operations. However, the challenges were many, including the weather. The length of the air strip is only 1,300 metres and the mountainous terrain posed a great danger to the aircraft making an approach for landing in the prevalent inclement weather conditions.

Moreover, there was no infrastructure to support flying operations of a sophisticated aircraft like the C-130J at Dharasu. But with a true professional approach and calculated risk management, a decision was taken to go ahead with the idea.

After a quick SWOT analysis of the terrain, weather and capability of the aircraft and aircrew, the C-130J was launched from the Hindon Air Base. The objective was achieved when the aircraft, despite the inclement weather, made its first historic landing at Dharasu early in the morning today.

In a first of its kind, the aircraft, after landing, offloaded 8,000 litres of fuel into an empty bowser - airlifted the previous day from Sarsawa by the heavy-lift Mi-26 helicopter - which further put life into the choppers which were starved of fuel till then.

With the availability of fuel at Dharasu, rescue operations picked up pace and, within no time, commenced non-stop flights, establishing a firm launch base by evening.

The C-130J crew was given a new task of airlifting pilgrims from Dharasu to Hindon on its return trip. To start with, 35 stranded pilgrims, some of them needing immediate medical assistance, were put on board and brought to the air base near Ghaziabad, a suburb of Delhi.

Having achieved the first objective, the Air Force quickly embarked upon a mission to establish a virtual fuel supply bridge and use the return trips to rescue the stranded pilgrims into safer locations. The second trip offloaded 8,000 kgs of fuel at Dharasu and picked up 101 passengers (80 adults and 21children, including two who were brought on stretcher) and brought them back to Hindon. Having transferred the required fuel at Dharasu, the third trip of the day was used to airlift the medical team of the Air Force to provide immediate assistance to the needy passengers awaiting airlift at Dharasu itself. This writer and a cameraperson colleague was on the third flight.

Having paved the way for fixed-wing aircraft operation from Dharasu, the Air Force quickly pressed its An-32 into action. The An-32s carried Disaster Communication Equipment Vehicles of the Air Force, some more fuel in Barrels, Sudan pumps for refueling the helicopters and bridging equipment of the Border Roads Organisation or BRO. By evening, a firm base had been established which will now see some very hectic flying in the days to come, including providing assistance to BRO to airlift some of its heavy road repair and construction machinery in rehabilitation work.

June 22, 2013 will remain a significant milestone in the Indian Air Force's history.
 
Do you think we should buy more of these gems?

This has been on my mind over the last 2 days. We haven't been hearing about AN-132s, Avros or IL-76 landing (although the -132s and 76s have had a role in this operation) but these C-130Js landing where others can't and flying through conditions where the aged IL-76/AVRO/AN-132s simply are nowhere as capable as this one machine when it comes to availability and all-weather and night flying. The fact is this machine has proven itself again and again (SIKKIM 2011 anyone) and the IAF have been very impressed by the bird. Not only is this machine very capable but the fact is has been able to achieve 85-90% availability is just, until now, unheard of in the IAF.


Sad thing is only 6 (and another 6 will be bought this year) have been procured to date and these are purely for Spec Ops.


There surely is a need for a further fleet of Herc for general utility, say, 20-30+ more? IIRC LM have said they will set up production of the Super Hercs in India with TATA if India orders enough (talk about industrial growth!). I'm just wondering what will happen now.

The IAF is already locked into the MTA project.........


@sancho- thoughts?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Excellent work by IAF. This proves that we can indeed wage a brilliant war effort on the North-East sector
as well with aircraft and servicemen like these.

+1 to the idea to buy more C-130J-30s. I think the plan to get 56 medium transporters to replace
Avro should be scrapped and in place more C-130J-30s (not the SOF-optimized variant) should be
procured.
 
Excellent work by IAF. This proves that we can indeed wage a brilliant war effort on the North-East sector
as well with aircraft and servicemen like these.

+1 to the idea to buy more C-130J-30s. I think the plan to get 56 medium transporters to replace
Avro should be scrapped and in place more C-130J-30s (not the SOF-optimized variant) should be
procured.
Agree, in part, not sure about scrapping the 56 Avro replacement tender as this is for low-end haulers with <10 ton load capacity and there is a need for such a a/c in the IAF IMHO. But yes, there is a need for more Hercs in the IAF IMHO, over and above the 12 for Spec Ops and in the utility version, not the customised Spec Ops version the IAF has right now.


There were plans for a basic, stripped down Herc varient IIRC but I can't find any links right now- can anyone help me out?
 
Agree, in part, not sure about scrapping the 56 Avro replacement tender as this is for low-end haulers with <10 ton load capacity and there is a need for such a a/c in the IAF IMHO. But yes, there is a need for more Hercs in the IAF IMHO, over and above the 12 for Spec Ops and in the utility version, not the customised Spec Ops version the IAF has right now.


There were plans for a basic, stripped down Herc varient IIRC but I can't find any links right now- can anyone help me out?

Tata Power SED (which already builds some components of Herc like the tail section, central wing section etc.) may get to license-build the stripped-down variant which will be used solely for transport purposes.

(edit)

And also TPSED may get the contract to build the regional MRO/service/spare parts
production center for all Hercs in South Asia somewhere in Hyderabad (Andhra).

I heard Vietnam was also looking to buy some C-130Js.
 
@gessler, here it is:

C-130XJ:

Lockheed Martin is offering to reduce the price of the C-130J Hercules by stripping out some of the more expensive systems. The U.S.-built airlifter is facing new competition later this decade, when Embraer&#8217;s yet-to-fly KC-390 becomes available.


The company has designated the new version C-130XJ. The &#8220;X&#8221; is short for X-pandable, meaning that the features that are removed from the aircraft could be subsequently reinstated. In a briefing at the Singapore Airshow, the company provided few details of the proposed C-130XJ. George Standridge, Lockheed Martin vice president of business development, suggested that the electronic warfare and cargo handling systems could be downgraded, for those customers who did not need to make deliveries or airdrops under combat conditions. Standridge was not willing to quote a price for the C-130XJ, other than to note that the unit recurring flyaway cost should be &#8220;10 to 15 percent lower&#8221; than a standard short-fuselage C-130J.


This sounds PERFECT for what the IAF needs for these internal humanitarian operations. A large number of these with the IAF but co-located with NDRF teams and relief equipment and India will be dramatically more able to handle these sort of tragedies.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
@gessler, here it is:

C-130XJ:




This sounds PERFECT for what the IAF needs for these internal humanitarian operations. A large number of these with the IAF but co-located with NDRF teams and relief equipment and India will be dramatically more able to handle these sort of tragedies.

The IAF presently operates the long-fuselage version of J-30, am I right?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Agree, in part, not sure about scrapping the 56 Avro replacement tender as this is for low-end haulers with <10 ton load capacity and there is a need for such a a/c in the IAF IMHO. But yes, there is a need for more Hercs in the IAF IMHO, over and above the 12 for Spec Ops and in the utility version, not the customised Spec Ops version the IAF has right now.


There were plans for a basic, stripped down Herc varient IIRC but I can't find any links right now- can anyone help me out?


what do you think what should replace Avro??C-27 Spartan,another stunner but expensive or more C-130(but C-130 is far more capable and not in the same class)???or any other craft???

I think we should buy more(around 20-25) C-130 as well more C-17(around 20 more) as well as we should choose a capable aircraft for replacement of Avro which ca land on smaller semi prepared runway.that would give IAF a great but much needed logistical edge.
 
C-130XJ:

721_c-130xj.png



Buy 20-30+ of these for the IAF (maybe, just maybe have these under the operational control of the NDMA/NDRF). Buy 10-20 Sea Hercs for the IN and build then all in India through TATA POWER SED- done.

SC-130J1-600-x-337.jpg



SC-130J2.jpg



Buy 10-20 Sea Hercs for the IN and build them all in India through TATA POWER SED- done.
 
This has been on my mind over the last 2 days. We haven't been hearing about AN-132s, Avros or IL-76 landing (although the -132s and 76s have had a role in this operation) but these C-130Js landing where others can't and flying through conditions where the aged IL-76/AVRO/AN-132s simply are nowhere as capable as this one machine when it comes to availability and all-weather and night flying. The fact is this machine has proven itself again and again (SIKKIM 2011 anyone) and the IAF have been very impressed by the bird. Not only is this machine very capable but the fact is has been able to achieve 85-90% availability is just, until now, unheard of in the IAF.


Sad thing is only 6 (and another 6 will be bought this year) have been procured to date and these are purely for Spec Ops.


There surely is a need for a further fleet of Herc for general utility, say, 20-30+ more? IIRC LM have said they will set up production of the Super Hercs in India with TATA if India orders enough (talk about industrial growth!). I'm just wondering what will happen now.

The IAF is already locked into the MTA project.........


@sancho- thoughts?
Actually it situations like these which show the versatility of such machines. have a feeling that more will be ordered seeing their usefulness in this disaster.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
what do you think what should replace Avro??C-27 Spartan,another stunner but expensive or more C-130(but C-130 is far more capable and not in the same class)???or any other craft???

I think we should buy more(around 20-25) C-130 as well more C-17(around 20 more) as well as we should choose a capable aircraft for replacement of Avro which ca land on smaller semi prepared runway.that would give IAF a great but much needed logistical edge.

For the Avro replacement, I think the C-295W is a good way to go.

Airbus Military launches improved C295W transport for India


Then another 20-30 C-130XJs and another 20 C-17s.


+
It's funny we've all discounted the MTA in all this!

Actually it situations like these which show the versatility of such machines.

Exactly, specifications and PR talk is all well and good on paper but it is only when you put these machines to use like this that you can actually validate any of this and justify any follow-on orders.



have a feeling that more will be ordered seeing their usefulness in this disaster.
I hope you are right.
 
Back
Top Bottom