Skull and Bones
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 29, 2011
- Messages
- 18,601
- Reaction score
- -4
- Country
- Location
Thats a typo for sure
In the Cold War, soviet SAMs were capable of carrying sub kiloton warheads to destroy large formation of US aircrafts.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Thats a typo for sure
Its not cold war anymore and we don't have guts like russians had.In the Cold War, soviet SAMs were capable of carrying sub kiloton warheads to destroy large formation of US aircrafts.
Its not cold war anymore and we don't have guts like russians had.
Not to mention it looks like stupid move
It would have lead to a nuclear war .No, it makes perfect sence, given the accuracy was poor in that period.
It would have lead to a nuclear war .
Plus those times were crazy
Fine.No, SAMs are defensive weapon, and if they fire, that'd be used in their own territory.
Each Akash battery consists of:
1.3 x Self propelled launcher.
2.1 x Battery level radar,a Rajendra passive phased array radar.
3.1 x Command post.
Can u post some better details?
Why are we developing the sr-sam in callaboration with french?Here it is, a nice compromise between the IAF's trailer mounted launcher and the IA's original request for a tracked launcher:
Why are we developing the sr-sam in callaboration with french?
Is that only for warships to replace barak-1 or land based too?
Why are we developing the sr-sam in callaboration with french?
Is that only for warships to replace barak-1 or land based too?
You deserve a thumbs upAre SAM's are nuclear capable ?? basically SAM's are used to hit aerial targets.. Are nuclear SAM's designated to make huge aerial huge??
lol, you must be kidding me..... you just see above line,what the author wrote about akash sam..You deserve a thumbs up