What's new

US won't sit idle if India-China conflict breaks out

Napalm

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Mar 15, 2010
Messages
126
Reaction score
0
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/...t-breaks-out-experts/articleshow/59776785.cms

BEIJING: The US is not likely to be an idle witness in the case of a military conflict between India and China and it might take actions to put pressure on Beijing, two experts told TNN in interviews.

"I do not think that the United States would become involved in a border conflict between China and India, but I do think that an increasingly competitive China-India dynamic is likely to lead to increased security cooperation between the United States and India," Zack Cooper, senior fellow at the Washington based Center for Strategic and International Studies told TNN.

Cooper said the US is trying to balance against China's growing power and India can play a major role in this balancing effort.

"In that sense, if China continues to pursue its claims against India, Beijing risks creating an anti-China balancing coalition of its own making," he said. "In my view, Beijing would be wise to de-escalate the crisis and resolve the stalemate without a violent conflict," he added.

Rising military competition between the US and China has kept Beijing engaged in recent weeks. The US might enhance its naval presence in case of a conflict in the India-China border, analysts said.

"Should the ongoing push and shove turn into a hot war, Washington is expected to provide logistical, intelligence and material support to India's military," said Mohan Malik, professor of Asia-Pacific Center for Security in Honolulu. "It might even dispatch an aircraft carrier and submarines to the Indian Ocean to monitor and deter Chinese naval assets," he said.

Chinese concerns about the US taking sides with India were reflected in a commentary in government backed Global Times on Wednesday.

"There are certain forces in the West that are instigating a military clash between China and India, from which they can seek strategic benefits at no cost to themselves. Washington applied this scheme in the South China Sea disputes," it said.


Malik said some Chinese strategic thinkers are favouring a short war would give India a bloody nose while helping China take forward its goal of achieving a Sino-centric regional order in Asia.
 
.
"There are certain forces in the West that are instigating a military clash between China and India, from which they can seek strategic benefits at no cost to themselves. Washington applied this scheme in the South China Sea disputes," it said.

Both India and China understand this and there will be no war.
Only media frenzy war will continue for few more weeks.

I am actually very pleased on the overall Indian management of this issue , media , government , opposition and common man has been very efficient in the whole issue , everybody could forsee that there won't be a war.
 
. . .
Both India and China understand this and there will be no war.
Only media frenzy war will continue for few more weeks.

I am actually very pleased on the overall Indian management of this issue , media , government , opposition and common man has been very efficient in the whole issue , everybody could forsee that there won't be a war.

India is actually stuck in Doklam. It is in Chinese territory and time is ticking for it to find a face saving solution. Otherwise it will have to unilaterally withdraw as per Chinese demands, which will be a major embarrassment and which is the Chinese strategy at the moment.

Haha. India cannot stay in Doklam indefinitely, which would be tantamount to annexation!
 
.
India is actually stuck in Doklam. It is in Chinese territory and time is ticking for it to find a face saving solution. Otherwise it will have to unilaterally withdraw as per Chinese demands, which will be a major embarrassment and which is the Chinese strategy at the moment.

Haha. India cannot stay in Doklam indefinitely, which would be tantamount to annexation!
Did you read our ministers statement that we are in for long stay.we have done it in the past and have no doubt in doing it again.
One of your retired pakistani army officer rightly said on the stand off,if Chinese could have done something they would have done it by now,it's over 40 days.this stand off will be resolved by talks .:-).
Rest is all your imagination and hope it might happen
 
.
As a defense partner US supply of equipment will be obvious.
US will make use of this opportunity to check Chinese capabilities.
 
.
India is actually stuck in Doklam. It is in Chinese territory and time is ticking for it to find a face saving solution. Otherwise it will have to unilaterally withdraw as per Chinese demands, which will be a major embarrassment and which is the Chinese strategy at the moment.

Haha. India cannot stay in Doklam indefinitely, which would be tantamount to annexation!

Isn't that place a disputed territory between the Chinese and the Indians? If so, considering Indian claims of a treaty with Bhutan, aren't they justified in being there? And finally, if a military force has forcibly taken over a territory and they haven't faced any military opposition in over a month, do you really believe that the routed force will return thereafter? I'm asking you these questions since the whole issue is rather confusing to me and whilst the Chinese claim that the Indians have made a mistake in their actions, I am yet to see the Chinese putting up any evidence or taking any action to prove this.
 
.
So now india want his new papa to save them from china.. lol keep dreaming kidoos
New papa ?
You reminded me this .

6j4qd4ge9hbz.jpg
 
.
Did you read our ministers statement that we are in for long stay.we have done it in the past and have no doubt in doing it again.
One of your retired pakistani army officer rightly said on the stand off,if Chinese could have done something they would have done it by now,it's over 40 days.this stand off will be resolved by talks .:-).
Rest is all your imagination and hope it might happen

The ministers might be making macho statements but India is also sending officials to China to resolve this matter. It has repeatedly said that it wants both sides to withdraw, which are signals of it being uncomfortable in Doklam.

I don't know about the statement you mentioned, but I see the Chinese strategy as letting this drag on to gain world favor of having its territory occupied by a foreign country with NO claim on it whatsoever.

The end result will either be a unilateral Indian withdrawal, or a border war.

Isn't that place a disputed territory between the Chinese and the Indians? If so, considering Indian claims of a treaty with Bhutan, aren't they justified in being there? And finally, if a military force has forcibly taken over a territory and they haven't faced any military opposition in over a month, do you really believe that the routed force will return thereafter? I'm asking you these questions since the whole issue is rather confusing to me and whilst the Chinese claim that the Indians have made a mistake in their actions, I am yet to see the Chinese putting up any evidence or taking any action to prove this.

It is a Chinese territory which is claimed by Bhutan. India has no claim on it. However it has been clearly marked in treaties between the 3 parties so there is no justification of this Indian action. India and Bhutan might have a treaty, but this is an offensive action rather than a defensive action, as Doklam is firmly within Chinese territorial boundaries.

Now that India has sent a military force, it is stuck on the plateau as it didn't have a claim in the first place and secondly, Doklam has been controlled by China for centuries. So the Indian military force will have to withdraw. It is not like Doklam is a part of Nepal which India can just snatch away.

I see the Chinese as building up support in the international community by showing restraint and at the same time, they are humiliating India by not giving them a face saving exit from their position. India cannot stay in Doklam for ever. That would be tantamount to annexation. At the same time, it cannot withdraw unilaterally because it would be exposed as weak. China is enjoying making India squirm in an untenable position.
 
.
Claims to be super power and confidence on USA for survival in case of war ...
 
.
The ministers might be making macho statements but India is also sending officials to China to resolve this matter. It has repeatedly said that it wants both sides to withdraw, which are signals of it being uncomfortable in Doklam.

I don't know about the statement you mentioned, but I see the Chinese strategy as letting this drag on to gain world favor of having its territory occupied by a foreign country with NO claim on it whatsoever.

The end result will either be a unilateral Indian withdrawal, or a border war.
It's not just about the area ,it's a small peace of land ,there is a bigger play going on .
You may claim it's China's land but truth is
China will not find supporters other than on PDF and Chinese sites,China knows it hence the response has been only threatening and no action on the ground, because China knows if things escalate it will stand isolated.

The end result will be China will agree to pull back troops and so will India after all it's not our land.
 
. .
So now india want his new papa to save them from china.. lol keep dreaming kidoos


Till now US is providing military aid to you for attacking Afghanistan using your land, and now you are happy that China is using Gwadar. So US and China are your papa. we dont rely on anyone.

Still you are going to US for meditating in Kashmir!

India's no to US mediation proves its claim on Kashmir is weak, says Pakistan
http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/india-no-us-mediation-proves-claim-kashmir-pakistan/1/921600.html


Damn right.. who is under chinas feet? supa pawa indiaa? :cheesy:


India is occupying Chinese land called Doklam, and they are crying for that through media. :rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:

The ministers might be making macho statements but India is also sending officials to China to resolve this matter. It has repeatedly said that it wants both sides to withdraw, which are signals of it being uncomfortable in Doklam.

I don't know about the statement you mentioned, but I see the Chinese strategy as letting this drag on to gain world favor of having its territory occupied by a foreign country with NO claim on it whatsoever.

The end result will either be a unilateral Indian withdrawal, or a border war.



It is a Chinese territory which is claimed by Bhutan. India has no claim on it. However it has been clearly marked in treaties between the 3 parties so there is no justification of this Indian action. India and Bhutan might have a treaty, but this is an offensive action rather than a defensive action, as Doklam is firmly within Chinese territorial boundaries.

Now that India has sent a military force, it is stuck on the plateau as it didn't have a claim in the first place and secondly, Doklam has been controlled by China for centuries. So the Indian military force will have to withdraw. It is not like Doklam is a part of Nepal which India can just snatch away.

I see the Chinese as building up support in the international community by showing restraint and at the same time, they are humiliating India by not giving them a face saving exit from their position. India cannot stay in Doklam for ever. That would be tantamount to annexation. At the same time, it cannot withdraw unilaterally because it would be exposed as weak. China is enjoying making India squirm in an untenable position.



Stop cheereleading for China! :cheers:
 
.
The US won't do a thing, apart from watch and issue a statement. India isn't S.Korea or Japan, nor is it S.Vietnam or Pakistan, two states which were let down to a whole host of factors when it came to crunch time.
As for weapons supplies, think embargo.....
 
.
Back
Top Bottom