US will deploy more missile defense systems in Asia

[Nan Yang]

Didn't a couple of Chinese activists landed on a island in dispute which caused Japanese to respond and create more tensions between you and Japan? U.S. didn't do anything to get China to do something like that.

China did not start and did not do anything. It was the Japanese politician (Blink Blink San) who promote the idea of buying the island started the ball rolling. That was followed by Taiwanese activists that managed to enter the 12 mile limit protected by 2 Taiwanese Patrol boats. Followed by these activists that were organized from Hong Kong some are even anti-CCP.

But I do not blame you for thinking China was behind all these. I also read western mainstream media.

That be like saying having ballistic missiles does little to promote friendship especially considering Japan doesn't have any nuclear weapons or ballistic missiles because of its Constitution that prevents that. All it can carry is its "useless" shield and cannot retaliate in kind. China has ballistic missiles and Japan has missile defense. Nothing to worry about and shouldn't even cause any breakdown in relations.

Actions speaks louder than words. "Probably" as you said doesn't cut it.

And if you study the history, US has threaten China with nuclear weapon during the Korean war at a time when China did not have any nuclear weapons.
It was only because of that China started to build a credible nuclear deterrent. Against nuclear blackmail.

China nuclear policy is the results of US actions.

How U.S. Strategic Policy Is Changing China


For you info China nuclear weapons policy is
No first use of nuclear weapon
No use of nuclear weapon against non-nuclear weapon state
No nuclear arm race.

Japan may not have any nuclear weapons. But Japan has delivery systems, and enough by product of nuclear power to make nuclear weapons in a short time.

 

[Nan Yang]

This is the way that Americans allocate their missile defense system:

An idiot can figure out that it take 2 very expensive anti-missiles missiles to take out one very cheap ballistic missile. Enough said.

 

[ajtr]

An idiot can figure out that it take 2 very expensive anti-missiles missiles to take out one very cheap ballistic missile. Enough said.

no one care about the cost if it save the people.Even if it takes 100 missiles to take down 1 cheap missile country will fire those 100 missiles.life is more costly then the price tag of the missiles.

 

[Wright]

An idiot can figure out that it take 2 very expensive anti-missiles missiles to take out one very cheap ballistic missile. Enough said.

Launching a missle is an act of war and gives full permission of retaliation. So if the cheap balliatic missle is taken out by the defence shield, it still means retaliation. Now if the country that launched the missle does not have such systems of its own....

 

[Nan Yang]

no one care about the cost if it save the people.Even if it takes 100 missiles to take down 1 cheap missile country will fire those 100 missiles.life is more costly then the price tag of the missiles.

He he he. Perhaps that is why China is not complaining much. The best missile defence is to have good relationship with your neighbor. Cost you nothing.

Why do you think N Korea wants the bomb ?
All US has to do is to remove N Korea from the "Axis of Evil". Signed a peace with N Korea. But NO. US has to promote its regime change policy.

China can be a good neighbor with BOTH North and South Korea. Why can't US ?

 

[Bang Galore]

He he he. Perhaps that is why China is not complaining much. The best missile defence is to have good relationship with your neighbor. Cost you nothing.

He he he....pity no one in China is listening.

 

[Battle of Bach Dang River]

An idiot can figure out that it take 2 very expensive anti-missiles missiles to take out one very cheap ballistic missile. Enough said.

Of course it is not effective against favorite tactic "human waves" of the Chinese.
However, it is effective against a limit attack and it effective to deter...

 

[Nan Yang]

He he he....pity no one in China is listening.

But China is not building the missile shield. In fact I do not think it will ever be build. US and especially Japan are not that stupid.

Just look at the radar for the missile shield. It is so laughable. It stupid from the begining.
It a big big floating monster in the middle of a flat ocean.

Of course it is not effective against favorite tactic "human waves" of the Chinese.
However, it is effective against a limit attack and it effective to deter...

And this radar is not even efective. It has failed numerous times.

 

[Holmes]

Defense shield do not work. Simple as that.

Exactly what i thought.

 

[anon45]

Without the US openly declared she'll back Japan's island claim, you think she has the audacity to arrest Chinese national in Chinese territory. Hell, she would've apologies for her atrocities in WWII if there wasn't a strong backer behind her.

That has been our position since the 1970's, it is not new, your faux outrage at it however, is.

 

[tvsram1992]

China does not interfer with internal affairs of other countries
China do not promote regime change
China do not export its brand of government
China do not base arm forces overseas
China does not allow foreign seperatist movement in its territories to harm other countries

China foreign policy is simple. To support Peace and stability. So that China can catch up with the West.

Did any one asked you April 1st Quotes ?

 

[dunhill]

The bottom line that China asked for troubles and now all of it seems to be true. China asked U.S to "Shut up" now U.S just do it and says no more. China is great !!!

 

[faithfulguy]

no one care about the cost if it save the people.Even if it takes 100 missiles to take down 1 cheap missile country will fire those 100 missiles.life is more costly then the price tag of the missiles.

Very honorable thought. The problem is not the will, but the cost. And the cost translate into quantity. Even US has a limited funds to build anti-missile defense. And its not feasible to build anti-missile defense against the cheap low quality missile.

What US need is a change of attitude toward other countries. US should stay out of other countries business and focus on building friendship and trade with these countries. Countries that has issues with one another must resolve those themselves.

 

[Oldman1]

He he he. Perhaps that is why China is not complaining much. The best missile defence is to have good relationship with your neighbor. Cost you nothing.

Why do you think N Korea wants the bomb ?
All US has to do is to remove N Korea from the "Axis of Evil". Signed a peace with N Korea. But NO. US has to promote its regime change policy.

China can be a good neighbor with BOTH North and South Korea. Why can't US ?

Good relations thats pretty funny considering North Korea still wants to attempt to conquer South Korea. South Korea has in the past attempted to mend relations with North Korea but it keeps beating its chest for war by sinking a South Korea warship and firing on South Korean territory. Good relations hah!

 

[Oldman1]

China did not start and did not do anything. It was the Japanese politician (Blink Blink San) who promote the idea of buying the island started the ball rolling. That was followed by Taiwanese activists that managed to enter the 12 mile limit protected by 2 Taiwanese Patrol boats. Followed by these activists that were organized from Hong Kong some are even anti-CCP.

But I do not blame you for thinking China was behind all these. I also read western mainstream media.

Don't need to blame me for thinking China did it because it did do it. China allowing protests to damage Japanese property and allowing activists to get on the island in the first place. We know how strict they are on protests in the past and they could have easily stopped it all. Nobody does this without Chinese government's. permission. A person who wants to buy the island is not the same as somebody who wants to invade it.

And if you study the history, US has threaten China with nuclear weapon during the Korean war at a time when China did not have any nuclear weapons.
It was only because of that China started to build a credible nuclear deterrent. Against nuclear blackmail.

China nuclear policy is the results of US actions.

How U.S. Strategic Policy Is Changing China


For you info China nuclear weapons policy is
No first use of nuclear weapon
No use of nuclear weapon against non-nuclear weapon state
No nuclear arm race.

Japan may not have any nuclear weapons. But Japan has delivery systems, and enough by product of nuclear power to make nuclear weapons in a short time.

Douglas MacArthur wanted to nuke China but who stopped him? Thats right our President Harry Truman. Learn more of our history. We could have nuke the Soviet Union and China while we had the monopoly of nukes for a few years but we didn't. Even over the Berlin blockade we didn't go nuking the Soviets. China would want nukes anyways. And in war China which is known for its author of Art of War would not play by its own rules.