What's new

US trying to drag NATO in war with Iran

mangekyo

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Jan 29, 2017
Messages
2,495
Reaction score
-4
Country
Iran, Islamic Republic Of
Location
Iran, Islamic Republic Of
Pompeo shares details on 'escalating' Iran threats in Brussels: U.S. State Dept

BRUSSELS (Reuters) - U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo shared information on “escalating” threats from Iran with European allies and NATO officials during meetings in Brussels on Monday, the U.S. special representative for Iran said.

FILE PHOTO - U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo speaks during the Arctic Council summit at the Lappi Areena in Rovaniemi, Finland May 7, 2019. Mandel Ngan/Pool via REUTERS
“Iran is an escalating threat and this seemed like a timely visit on his way to Sochi,” Brian Hook told reporters, referring to Pompeo’s planned visit to Russia on Tuesday for meetings with Russian President Vladimir Putin and Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov.

Pompeo canceled a visit to Moscow on Monday and stopped in Brussels instead, en route to Sochi.

“The secretary wanted to share some details behind what we have been saying publicly,” Hook said. “We believe that Iran should try talks instead of threats. They have chosen poorly by focusing on threats.”


Hook said Pompeo, while in Brussels, also discussed reported attacks on several oil tankers off the coast of the United Arab Emirates.

Asked if Pompeo was blaming Iran for the attacks, Hook said: “We discussed ... what seemed to be attacks on commercial vessels that were anchored ... we have been requested by the UAE to provide assistance in the investigation, which we are very glad to do.”

Asked if he himself believed there was the possibility of an Iranian role, Hook had no comment.

The UAE said on Sunday that four commercial vessels were sabotaged near Fujairah emirate, one of the world’s largest bunkering hubs lying just outside the Strait of Hormuz. It did not describe the nature of the attack or say who was behind it.


Saudi Arabia said Monday that two of its oil tankers were among those attacked and described it as an attempt to undermine the security of crude supplies amid tensions between the United States and Iran.

The UAE on Monday identified the vessels as very large crude carrier (VLCC) tanker Amjad and crude tanker Al Marzoqah, both owned by Saudi shipping firm Bahri. The other two were UAE-flagged fuel bunker barge A. Michel and Norwegian-registered oil products tanker MT Andrew Victory.
 
. .
Yep This is it. I think Iran perhaps did the one thing it shouldn't have done. Mobilisation will begin soon against Iran. They may get attacked
 
.
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Iran is a leading candidate for having carried out attacks on four tankers near the United Arab Emirates but the United States does not have conclusive proof Tehran was behind them, a U.S. official familiar with American intelligence said on Monday.

“This is what Iran does ... The sort of thing you could see Iran doing ... It fits their M.O. (modus operandi),” said the official on condition of anonymity, saying the most obvious explanation for Iran’s statements distancing itself from the incident was that Tehran was “trying to muddy the waters.”
 
.
this narrative is as credible as "Saddam has WMDs"
^^ 4 people gave thumbs-up to this post by mistake!

oh.. BTW the premise that "US trying to drag NATO in war with Iran" is faulty to say the least because no dragging of any kind is required when it comes to a conflict between a NATO country and another. it is kinda automatic.

and furthermore war between NATO and Iran is illogical thus a big fat lie!!!
 
Last edited:
.
I have no hate for the Iranian people, but a regime change is in order. The neighboring countries, and more importantly, the Iranian people, have have enough at the hands of the regressive regime for the last 40 years. Their time is up. Not even Imam Mahdi himself can save the Ayatollahs now.
 
.
oh.. BTW the premise that "US trying to drag NATO in war with Iran" is faulty to say the least because no dragging of any kind is required when it comes to a conflict between a NATO country and another. it is kinda automatic.

Ehm no. NATO is only obliged to respond to any attack against it members. If US attack’s first, NATO isn’t obliged to do anything. That’s why US is trying to paint Iran as the aggressor in order to drag NATO in a war.

and furthermore war between NATO and Iran is illogical thus a big fat lie!!!

Iraq and Afghanistan..
 
.
NATO is only obliged to respond to any attack against it members. If US attack’s first, NATO isn’t obliged to do anything. That’s why US is trying to paint Iran as the aggressor in order to drag NATO in a war.
never happens like that in practice, I still maintain that Iran will one day be exposed as a Trojan horse that it is!
Iraq and Afghanistan..
there were/are "valid" reasons for that
 
.
Iran should tune down its language against U.S.A. They says "Death to america" everyday . Pakistan don't want destabilize neighbor, war will effect us too.
 
.
I don't think any NATO member wants to fight Iran for the United States and Israel.
 
. . . . . .

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom