US to give 40pc aid to Pakistan via non-govt sector

[JayAtl]

Musharraf is cited in the very article ( huffington post)you posted as having robbed / diverted for his causes the aid money by your damn generals - and you show a video of him as testimony! ROFL.

and I have clearly show you distinction in military vs economic aid in the list I have provided ( again showing you never read it because you just want to argue).

To top that you ask me !!! and this CRACKS ME UP - 'show support for the siphoning from unbiased source, when it is THERE IN the article you cited , in the very article you posted it says it- again showing you did not read what you also cited a as a source.

I leave you to keep proclaiming the world is flat...buh bye.

 

[SMC]

I think you've gotten in trouble many times before for discussing age of people, where they live, how long they've lived there for, etc, before because it was irrelevant to the thread. Looks like that might be the case here again.

 

[JayAtl]

I think you've gotten in trouble many times before for discussing age of people, where they live, how long they've lived there for, etc, before because it was irrelevant to the thread. Looks like that might be the case here again.

He discussed his age on threads I simply said he is young , by his own confession. I never discussed where he lives, he asked what would be my reaction as Indian in America if they attacked India. I replied to that... 'I would not have a reaction like him_ being Pakistani in America because blah blah..

please read threads before you elect yourself the hall monitor . I never brought up his residence till he questioned mine.

I would love to see how much support JayAtl would give to America the day it decides to attack India. No matter how much he tries to show his loyalties lie with the US, his loyalties will always lie with India, which is why he wants to prolong the war in Afghanistan and see turmoil in Pakistan, even if it means bankrupting the US. I would never wish the US to extend a war into India.

 

[SMC]

Well the age is not relevant in this thread. You were the one to bring it up here. Also, as far as the other things, I am simply giving you examples of how you keep getting personal to other members.

Also, you're getting personal to me as well.

 

[53fd]

I have posted two links which show that only a fraction of both the Civilian (2010. Washington Post) and Military Aid (2002-2008. Huffington Post) was received by Pakistan. I've clearly made a distinction between the two aids mentioned, you just have difficulties comprehending regular posts written in English. The link I posted (had Musharraf's interview with Fareed Zakeria) said this (I have to write everything said in there for you because you clearly didn't open it):

"The total "aid" you are talking about is not total aid, half of that "aid" is nothing but reimbursements for the services Pakistan has provided for the US in the WOT. It is Pakistan's rightful money for the services it has provided. The remaining half, half of that remaining half is military assistance for the WOT, the other remaining half of that half is non-military assistance."

The link did not talk about generals robbing aid money, you are clearly fabricating this. The link clearly says that the US is suspecting that part of the aid money for the WOT is being diverted away towards its Eastern border. It does not conclusively say that, so its only speculation (the word "suspecting") from The Huffington Post.

However, the article did say this, which you clearly forgot to mention parts of the article that didn't suit your thoughts:

The U.S. is also insisting on more accountability for reimbursing money spent. For example, Pakistan is still waiting for $1.7 billion for which it has billed the United States under a Coalition Support Fund to reimburse allies for money spent on the war on terror.

 

[JayAtl]

Well the age is not relevant in this thread. You were the one to bring it up here. Also, as far as the other things, I am simply giving you examples of how you keep getting personal to other members.

Also, you're getting personal to me as well.[/

Just shoot me next time I decide to reply to you. You have accused me in several replies on this thread, I did not bother replying to you- because frankly I tend to ignore you for the very logic I quoted you above.

 

[53fd]

Well the age is not relevant in this thread. You were the one to bring it up here. Also, as far as the other things, I am simply giving you examples of how you keep getting personal to other members.

Also, you're getting personal to me as well.[/QUOTE]

Just shoot me next time I decide to reply to you. You have accused me in several replies on this thread, I did not bother replying to you- because frankly I tend to ignore you for the very logic I quoted you above.

Well Mr JayAtl, did I ever ask you for your age, or where you live? Yes, I'm possibly younger than you, & I moved to the US in December 2001. But you were the one that started by saying I was in kindergarten (or not even born) when the US started giving aid to Pakistan. You also quoted my age in other posts as well. You were the one that started making things personal, I never said anything on a personal level to you. And when I make one personal post later on about your Indian loyalties, you just can't take it anymore. So please, spare us with your hypocrisies and stop making things personal. You've also done that on a few other threads as well, but I chose to let it go. Just some friendly advice.

 

[SMC]

Just shoot me next time I decide to reply to you. You have accused me in several replies on this thread, I did not bother replying to you- because frankly I tend to ignore you for the very logic I quoted you above.

What exactly was "hall monitor" part? Good logical discussion? You didn't reply to me because you know what you're speaking is BS and you don't have a counter argument to the facts I am putting forward.

 

[VelocuR]

I never understand what the heck Indian problems with Pakistan Aid. It is between US and Pakistan. Oh wait IAEA clearance for approving new two reactors.


any complaining?? Grow up, please!

P.S: Indian taxpayers not happy with US is require to leave US soon. Case solved.

 

[JayAtl]

I never understand what the heck Indian problems with Pakistan Aid. It is between US and Pakistan. Oh wait IAEA clearance for approving new two reactors.


any complaining?? Grow up, please!

P.S: Indian taxpayers not happy with US is require to leave US soon. Case solved.

you would have the read page one of the thread to figure out my problem. I'm an American tax payer who wants US out of drone attacks and Afghanistan and stoppage of all aid to Pakistan period. leave Pakistan to its own doing and get out and no more pay out. Let Pakistan run its own country the way it wants to run it and leave it. Let them get aid from some other country and source- no more American tax payer money ... done , finish- get out of there. when Us stopped aid during President carter, paksitan continued as a country under Zia- they did not collapse. not sure how their economy was under him- could care less

I'm happy for pakistan that IAEA approved it, I have alwasy advocated for pakistan to be stable. I even advocate for it have stronger relationships w/ india. But I don't stand for anti US aid bashing and lies. really that simple. ..