What's new

US to cut off aid to Palestinian, veto Palestinian recognition in UN

@solomon2

The Palestinians are a majority in the West Bank and Gaza. And just like the Jewish majority had a right to establish their state. In principle the Palestinians who are a majority in their areas have the right of self-determination and a state of their own in principle. There should be no confusion in that.

Here is the most recent advisory opinion based on International law by the ICJ http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/131/1671.pdf . This is the reason why the UN and its bodies refers to westbank and Gaza as occupied territories.

And as I mentioned even the US considers it illegal but just does not push Israel on it. Infact, the BBC says
The British Government believes that Israeli settlements on occupied territory are illegal. So does every other government in the world, except for Israel.
This is not because they are concerned about their lives or "scared" of the something but because they genuinely believe this as signatories to the 4th Geneva convention.

Groups like HAMAS came to power BECAUSE there was no end to the situation in the occupied territories. For example, when India occupied East Pakistan in 1971, if India had not removed its troops and continued to occupy East Pakistan that would be in violation of the4th Geneva convention and considered a crime by the ICJ. One of the reason why India had to withdrew asap.

And I think anyone would find it hard to believe that Israel would face an existential threat from anything that the Palestinians could muster. Israel is the preminent military force in the region and the only nuclear power. It does not have to think twice when it wants to target military operations anywhere in the region as has been demonstrated again and again which reemphasize that Israel is the most powerful state again. So to say that Israel will be "destroyed" by a demilitarised Palestine sounds far fetched.

The ground realities are different today. Arab countries are not looking to "Destroy" Israel anymore. They have explicitly came out with the Arab peace plan to not only recognize Israel but to establish diplomatic and trade relations since 2000 and welcome it as part of the ME community. In essence they want Israel to not think itself as a colonial outpost of the west in the wild ME, but consider itself as part and parcel of the Middle East region. But ofcourse all this is predicated on resolving the issue of Palestinians. None of the options you listed can be a solution in the modern world and can ever be accepted by any Palestinian who has thousands of years of history in that land.

And this is something Israelis themselves have been raising as an important issue. For example, just coming back to the settlements, Israeli groups themselves have been vocally against it so much so that the Knesset passed a "Boycott law" which basically bans any calls of boycotts regarding the settlements.

Lastly, I will just post a moving article by an Israeli who has done much more than you would have ever done for Israel. Do read what he has to say about the settlements. This will be my last post on this thread.

Yes Mr. Lieberman, I'm a proud Jewish terrorist - Haaretz Daily Newspaper | Israel News
The foreign minister says Yesh Din, the organization of whose public council I am a member, is a terrorist organization - 69 years after the British Mandatory government defined me as a terrorist.

In 1942, as a young boy, a high school student in Tel Aviv, I joined the Haganah (the main pre-state underground Jewish militia ). The British Mandatory government considered me, and others who did as I did, to be members of an illegal organization. Two years later I enlisted in the Palmach, the elite strike force of the Haganah, and during my period of activity in the framework of the Jewish resistance movement the British government considered me a "terrorist." Afterwards I fought in the War of Independence and spent another 32 years in the Israel Defense Forces as a career soldier.

Today I consider the continuation of our occupation rule in Judea and Samaria an existential danger. As I see it, this situation is threatening the main achievement to which I contributed 70 years ago: the establishment of a sovereign and democratic Jewish state. If we don't separate as soon as possible from the Palestinian population on the ground, Jewish and democratic Israel will be unable to survive.

A few years ago I became a member of the public council of Yesh Din - Volunteers for Human Rights. I can't influence Israel's diplomatic decisions, but I saw it as my duty to contribute to upholding the law in the occupied under our control. I believe that the Israeli government, the Knesset and the vast majority of the people want the law to be enforced in the area east of the Green Line, just as they want it to be enforced to the west of it. But in the present situation, unfortunately, there is no equal treatment for Jews and Arabs when it comes to law enforcement. The legal system that enforces the law in a discriminatory way on the basis of national identity, is actually maintaining an apartheid regime. And I wanted to prevent that with my activity and contribution as a member of the council of Yesh Din.

The Palestinian resident in the occupied territory is unable in most cases to stand up for his rights and to find his way in the State of Israel's civil and military bureaucratic maze. The group of researchers and volunteers (mainly female ) of Yesh Din serve as his mouthpiece. We do not presume to decide who is right in each and every instance. Our job is only to learn about all the details of the complaint and to bring it to the authorities.

The Israeli administration in the area, the IDF and the Israel Police, don't like our activity. They feel uncomfortable dealing with the complaints that we place before them. But none of them claims that our activity is unnecessary, unacceptable or subversive.

Yesterday something shocking happened. A respectable minister in the Israeli government, the foreign minister, the man who heads the Yisrael Beitenu party, called the organization of whose public council I am a member, Yesh Din, a terrorist organization - 69 years after the British Mandatory government defined me as a terrorist.

At the time I considered the epithet attached to me by the Mandatory government a badge of honor. Today I see the same title, which this time was attached to me by Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman, as a new badge of honor. I believe that the activity of Yesh Din deserves a medal. I see our activity as a crucial attempt to save the State of Israel from becoming an apartheid regime.

The foreign minister should have been the first to understand that. Doesn't he understand that a person who condemns the activity of Yesh Din is in effect announcing a deliberate intention to maintain a miscarriage of justice, a deliberate intention to maintain separate systems of law and justice for Jews and Arabs? Under these circumstances, Mr. Lieberman, I'm proud to be called a "terrorist" by you.
 
.
The Palestinians are a majority in the West Bank and Gaza. And just like the Jewish majority had a right to establish their state. In principle the Palestinians who are a majority in their areas have the right of self-determination and a state of their own in principle. There should be no confusion in that.
That's not what the post-WWI arrangements that designated Palestine as a Jewish National Home were about. They were about separating nationalities mixed up by three empires - Russian, Austro-Hungarian, and Ottoman - into separate nation-states. Germans were a majority in many parts of Eastern Europe (depending on how you drew the lines) yet had to give that up in order to let other nationalities thrive. Their was absolutely no sense that the Arabs of Palestine considered themselves a separate nationality in 1919.

Here is the most recent advisory opinion based on International law by the ICJ http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/131/1671.pdf .
You've gotten this far, now do the work and quote the sections that back what you claim.
None of the options you listed can be a solution in the modern world and can ever be accepted by any Palestinian who has thousands of years of history in that land.
I detect no sense from you that Jews and Israelis have a right to justice. It's easy to vision a situation where Israel could cease to exist yet its conquerors would still demand reparations and "justice" from any survivors.

Jews are, as Ben-Gurion put it, a paranoid people who are persecuted. Yet Jews are not fearfully close-minded: when Sadat went to Jerusalem and made it clear that Egypt recognized Israel as a neighbor and all its claims against the Jewish state would cease when Egypt was satisfied, Israel paid the full price. (Note, however, that although Resolution 242 authorized Israel to keep territory it had conquered from its neighbors, the Sinai was NOT part of the British Mandate designating Palestine as the Jewish National Home.)

Lastly, I will just post a moving article by an Israeli who has done much more than you-
The time for human interest stories is after the legal argument has been clarified, not before.
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom