gambit
PROFESSIONAL
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2009
- Messages
- 28,569
- Reaction score
- 148
- Country
- Location
Now that is a pathetic argument in light of history. If true, then South Viet Nam would have fallen in the 1968 Tet Offensive when the North speculated that the Southern people would rise against their government. Instead, South Viet Nam held on until the US refused to support the war further while both China and the Soviets continued to support the North.There is no evasion, just false accusations from you. South Vietnam crumbled despite the American support. If the people did not support the communists, that would not have been the case Thus, the logical conclusion is that communism was embraced by the majority and only a minority was against it. The use of violence you spoke of was simply a futile attempt to hold on to power. You are free to fight for your beliefs, but it does not mean you will win.
Then you implied that I am a communist, when you have no idea what my political beliefs are.
Pathetic~
Regardless of your ideological persuasions, my questions still stands. But your continuing evasions of them speaks what you are too cowardly to declare. So...
- Do you approve of violence when persuasions failed?
- Do you approve of retreat when resisted on intellectual grounds?
- Do you approve of immediate use of violence when it is clear that someone is incapable of resistance?
Those are fair enough questions regardless of ideological persuasions. Brave and committed communists have no problems answering in the positive. Non-communists have no problems answering in the negative. I see no reason why you should be so afraid.