US South Asia experts seek clarity on PM Narendra Modi’s Baluchistan policy

[[Bregs]]

American South Asia experts seek clarity on PM Narendra Modi’s Balochistan policy

References to Balochistan, Gilgit and Azad Kashmir by Prime Minister Narendra Modi signals a change in India’s Pakistan policy, top American experts on South Asia have said as they sought more clarity on New Delhi’s new approach towards disturbed areas in Pakistan. “He’s (Modi) either appeasing hardliners at home or deliberately signaling to Pakistan in an effort to strengthen India’s hand in future discussions,” said Vikram J Singh, a former Obama Administration official who served in key positions in State Department, playing an important role in shaping its Af-Pak policy and later in the Defense Department.

“If the latter, it could backfire but be viewed as worth the risk,” cautioned Singh, vice president, national security and international policy at the Center for American Progress, a top US think-tank based in Washington DC. So far, Modi has demonstrated both a willingness to work with Pakistan and a willingness to take a hardline stance, he said.

However, Singh felt Modi’s deeper challenge is ensuring India has the allegiance of the majority of Kashmiris rather than growing resentment and resistance, much as Pakistan needs the Baluch to have a stake in the Pakistani state. “In the long term, the local people matter more to long term stability than do the far right political and chattering class. Appeasing hardliners for political ends leads to bad policy outcomes,” Singh said in response to a question.
“The reference to Balochistan in this year’s Independence Day speech certainly signals a change in tone in the Modi government’s Pakistan policy,” said Lisa Curtis of The Heritage Foundation, a top Americana think-tank, which is considered close to the Republican establishment. The attack on Pathankot air base earlier this year by Pakistan-based terrorists just six days after Modi’s goodwill visit to Lahore seems to have convinced Modi and his advisors of the futility of pursuing dialogue with Pakistan, Curtis noted.

While the previous Manmohan Singh government persevered with dialogue in the face of terrorist attacks, it can be argued that such forbearance paid few dividends for India, she said. “Still, it’s unlikely that the Balochistan reference heralds any significant new actions on the ground by India. Modi seems instead to be laying down a marker that his government will be less patient than its predecessor when it comes to Pakistani terrorist provocations,” Curtis said.

The Obama Administration, however, has refrained from making any comments on Modi’s Independence Day speech with regard to Azad Kashmir, Balochistan and Gilgit. Refusing to be drawn in the Kashmir debate, State Department Spokesperson Elizabeth Trudeau told reporters at a news conference on Monday, “Our position, as you well know, on Kashmir has not changed. The pace, the scope, the character of any discussions in Kashmir is for the two sides to determine,” she said.

http://indianexpress.com/article/in...dence-day-speech-Azad Kashmir-gilgit-2982751/

 

[ebrahym]

“If the latter, it could backfire but be viewed as worth the risk,”

exactly what i've been saying
its a double edged sword
the only upper hand India has over Pak right now is Afghanistan
with neutrality in Afghanistan(most likely if Ghani succeed in current political problems)
the plan is likely to backfire but if not its a trouble for Pak

 

[illusion8]

American South Asia experts seek clarity on PM Narendra Modi’s Balochistan policy

References to Balochistan, Gilgit and Azad Kashmir by Prime Minister Narendra Modi signals a change in India’s Pakistan policy, top American experts on South Asia have said as they sought more clarity on New Delhi’s new approach towards disturbed areas in Pakistan. “He’s (Modi) either appeasing hardliners at home or deliberately signaling to Pakistan in an effort to strengthen India’s hand in future discussions,” said Vikram J Singh, a former Obama Administration official who served in key positions in State Department, playing an important role in shaping its Af-Pak policy and later in the Defense Department.

“If the latter, it could backfire but be viewed as worth the risk,” cautioned Singh, vice president, national security and international policy at the Center for American Progress, a top US think-tank based in Washington DC. So far, Modi has demonstrated both a willingness to work with Pakistan and a willingness to take a hardline stance, he said.

However, Singh felt Modi’s deeper challenge is ensuring India has the allegiance of the majority of Kashmiris rather than growing resentment and resistance, much as Pakistan needs the Baluch to have a stake in the Pakistani state. “In the long term, the local people matter more to long term stability than do the far right political and chattering class. Appeasing hardliners for political ends leads to bad policy outcomes,” Singh said in response to a question.
“The reference to Balochistan in this year’s Independence Day speech certainly signals a change in tone in the Modi government’s Pakistan policy,” said Lisa Curtis of The Heritage Foundation, a top Americana think-tank, which is considered close to the Republican establishment. The attack on Pathankot air base earlier this year by Pakistan-based terrorists just six days after Modi’s goodwill visit to Lahore seems to have convinced Modi and his advisors of the futility of pursuing dialogue with Pakistan, Curtis noted.

While the previous Manmohan Singh government persevered with dialogue in the face of terrorist attacks, it can be argued that such forbearance paid few dividends for India, she said. “Still, it’s unlikely that the Balochistan reference heralds any significant new actions on the ground by India. Modi seems instead to be laying down a marker that his government will be less patient than its predecessor when it comes to Pakistani terrorist provocations,” Curtis said.

The Obama Administration, however, has refrained from making any comments on Modi’s Independence Day speech with regard to Azad Kashmir, Balochistan and Gilgit. Refusing to be drawn in the Kashmir debate, State Department Spokesperson Elizabeth Trudeau told reporters at a news conference on Monday, “Our position, as you well know, on Kashmir has not changed. The pace, the scope, the character of any discussions in Kashmir is for the two sides to determine,” she said.

http://indianexpress.com/article/in...dence-day-speech-Azad Kashmir-gilgit-2982751/

I think this should be clarified to the world before they look with suspicion anticipating a tit for tat for Pakistan's terrorism policy (LET, JEM, HUM, Taiban etc etc).

1. The Pakistani separatists came to India for support.

2. Non of those who came to India are designated as terrorist groups or terrorists.

3. The international community provides refuge for all the oppressed people of Baluchistan and Pakistani controlled region of Kashmir, thousands of people from these two regions have received asylum in many countries and thousands more are seeking asylum against atrocities perpetrated on them.

4. The international community does recognise this as a strife and troubled regions hence the asylum grants.

5. India will decide on humanitarian basis to provide the leaders from this region Moral and diplomatic support which they are pleading for from GOI.


No one in the world will have a problem with that.