US sets India rider for $1.5bn aid to Pakistan

[araz]

This is another bitter fruit of Pakistan's response to the bombing of the Indian embassy and Kabul and the Mumbai Massacre. Had Pakistan owned up to moral responsibility for these events and issued apologies - regardless of whether or not Pakistan was actually responsible for them - I doubt the U.S. would be putting the strings on today.

This is the most hilarious statement I have ever read. Moral responsibility inspite of not being actually responsible. Which Cloud and what part of this earth have you descended from? Responsibility is assumed when a crime or fault is proven. Here you have to prove that the Government of pakistan actually knowingly abbetted these criminals in carrying out these attacks. You know that this is not going to be possible,inspite of your high class dossiere that you have provided us.
Have you ever claimed moral and actual responsibility for the genoside that you have committed in kashmir during the last 2 decades? have you accepted the responsibility of denying the people of KAshmir the right to self determination inspite of resolutions from the UN?
People who live in glass houses should not be playing with stones!!! I hope you get the drift my friend.
Araz

 

[vkurian]

Pakistan should say no to the deal. But I don't think that will happen.
If it say's no then we will get a chance to see RAW at work.

Hey stop hiding behind the pic of Aishwariya....come out with your real identity.

 

[Solomon2]

Which Cloud and what part of this earth have you descended from? Responsibility is assumed when a crime or fault is proven.

When I was a kid the house next door was inhabited by the ambassador of Country A. Across the street the house was inhabited by a diplomat from Country B, adjacent to Country A.

One day B invaded A to attack guerillas. Was it war? I knew all was O.K. because I saw A shake hands with B at B's door across the street. Apparently it had secretly been a cooperative operation, and B took all the blame for it out of political necessity.

 

[Awesome]

I can't accept the label of terrorism just to feed $1.5Bn into Zardari's coffers.

 

[Solomon2]

But could you do it for the good of Pakistan, rather than Zardari?

 

[Patriot]

This is the most hilarious statement I have ever read. Moral responsibility inspite of not being actually responsible. Which Cloud and what part of this earth have you descended from? Responsibility is assumed when a crime or fault is proven. Here you have to prove that the Government of pakistan actually knowingly abbetted these criminals in carrying out these attacks. You know that this is not going to be possible,inspite of your high class dossiere that you have provided us.
Have you ever claimed moral and actual responsibility for the genoside that you have committed in kashmir during the last 2 decades? have you accepted the responsibility of denying the people of KAshmir the right to self determination inspite of resolutions from the UN?
People who live in glass houses should not be playing with stones!!! I hope you get the drift my friend.
Araz

He is American Zionist not India.He thinks all Muslims are his and Israel enemies just check his previous posts .

 

[HAIDER]

A wise Indian shouldn't support this bill, because being a neighboring country, that would bring more animosity between two. India should go for direct dialogue with Pakistan and Afghanistan. Just like India doesn't want US intervention in Kashmir problem and want to go for direct dialogue (which is already halted by giving excuses)

 

[shravan]

Hey stop hiding behind the pic of Aishwariya....come out with your real identity.

LoL. Look who is asking. Hey i am just echoing your sentiments which you have for RAW....

 

[TOPGUN]

Offcourse India welcomed it ! wat is this damn rubish Pakistan has laid down livies more then Your country ever will in a lifetime. Hatered at its finest from our enemy's i wish this bs would stop making sure harming another is not the way to be its enough stop this hate as far iam concerened i know we need this aid really bad but if it comes to such disrespect to us from the provider or from our enemy's they can all take it up the ... and go to hell long live Pakistan & GOD bless Pakistan we shall overcome this all .

 

[Awesome]

But could you do it for the good of Pakistan, rather than Zardari?

Pakistanis would obviously only push for things that are good for Pakistan. Writing "We are terrorists" and having it signed by a President of Pakistan is not good for Pakistan.

You see the US is not asking us to fight terrorism. For which we're ready and would push Zardari to sign it. How can we cease something that we are not even doing? This will have an effect on two things. 1) Pakistan would say we were terrorists and we'll not be one any more. 2) Some incidents would occur in India and Afghanistan which would be used to say no you still are terrorists, the one you admitted to earlier.

Game, set, match.

Pakistani leaders have to be real CHAYs to sign this.

 

[araz]

When I was a kid the house next door was inhabited by the ambassador of Country A. Across the street the house was inhabited by a diplomat from Country B, adjacent to Country A.

One day B invaded A to attack guerillas. Was it war? I knew all was O.K. because I saw A shake hands with B at B's door across the street. Apparently it had secretly been a cooperative operation, and B took all the blame for it out of political necessity.

You have obviously looked at it and understood it with the eyes of a kid. Do not talk in webs and tangles. Come out with your view point.
if you have to know, all the writings are not going to help pakistan. When the time is right and it suits the powers that be, they will label us with whatever they want. All that we say now will be used against us at that time and will incriminate us needlessly. No need fro such stupidity. Put your best foot forward and say no and walk away and while you are at it tell the US to stop thinking of Pakistan as a conduit of supply for their army or simply that the rates ahve gone up 10 times.
Araz

 

[Solomon2]

How can we cease something that we are not even doing?

1) You don't know for sure that Pakistan is not doing it.

2) The promise to stop doing something contains not just an admission, but an active effort of self-imposed obligation to change course to keep it from happening again without the baggage of, "We can keep doing it as long as we don't get caught."

 

[ajpirzada]

But could you do it for the good of Pakistan, rather than Zardari?

and how do u see this helpin pakistan??? will it bring any gud name to pakistan??

 

[Solomon2]

Do not talk in webs and tangles. Come out with your view point.

Over the past two days it seems I haven't been able to make it clear to some people what I'm trying to tell them. Sorry, but I am not a diplomat. I'm just doing the best I can to the limit of my poor abilities.

 

[ajpirzada]

This is another bitter fruit of Pakistan's response to the bombing of the Indian embassy and Kabul and the Mumbai Massacre. Had Pakistan owned up to moral responsibility for these events and issued apologies - regardless of whether or not Pakistan was actually responsible for them - I doubt the U.S. would be putting the strings on today.

wat a joke..... so thats how things work. accept anything wat america says or else they ll start lookin for a reason to turn u into afghanistan. isnt it? i mean y care about proves