US says it doesn’t support Balochistan’s independence

[Taimoor Khan]

Indian masters in west , headed by America got no balls to openly support Indian design on Baluchistan neither they can endorse Indian stance on Kashmir about "integral part" non sense. India is in soup.

This actually reminds me the old Pakistani Panjabi song:

"Sanu Naher walley pul day bulkay canda mahi, tu kithay rah gaya" .

 

[Spectre]

As made clear by the US spokespersons on several occasions, The US position on Kashmir has remain unchanged. The US recognizes Kashmir as a dispute that has to be resolved by India and Pakistan.

And Can you show us any statement (last 60 years or so) by US Govt. Spokesperson saying that they do NOT support Kashmiris' right to self determination ?

I am happy to

http://indianexpress.com/article/in...ndia-says-us-hizbul-burhan-encounter-2908055/


http://www.livemint.com/Politics/9i...ashmir-is-an-internal-matter-of-India-US.html


US Statement Dpt spokesperson saying Kashmir is an internal matter of India thus negating the self determination part.

 

[M. Sarmad]

I am happy to

http://indianexpress.com/article/in...ndia-says-us-hizbul-burhan-encounter-2908055/


US Statement Dpt spokesperson saying Kashmir is an internal matter of India thus negating the self determination part.

An Indian Source ?? Not reliable

Quote any neutral/US source ..

Post/quote A direct statement from the US spokesperson saying that Kashmir is an internal matter of India and the US does not support Kashmiris' right to self determination

 

[Spectre]

An Indian Source ?? Not at all reliable

Quote any neutral/US source

Why should I? It went un reported in west because it was a low priority issue amidst presidential elections. Indians grabbed on it because it favors us

Are you saying Indian Express and Business Standard are lying?

If so please dont quote their pro-kashmiri and anti Govt reports in future.

and by the same virtue dont quote Pakistani sources also in your future posts when making a point

Thanks

 

[M. Sarmad]

Why should I?

Okay, don't ... No neutral/reliable source had published this news

Are you saying Indian Express and Business Standard are lying?

What I am saying is that Press Trust of India cannot be trusted on news/matters related to Kashmir (or Pakistan). India itself is a party to the dispute, Indian Media is not neutral. And also, the Indian Media is well known for twisting facts/statements and fabricating news/stories.

..

 

[Spectre]

Okay, don't ... Because ?




What I am saying is that Press Trust of India cannot be trusted on news/matters related to Kashmir (or Pakistan). India itself is a party to the dispute, Indian Media is not neutral. And also, the Indian Media is well known for twisting facts/statements and fabricating news/stories.

Same applies to Pakistani media too..

I take your point and would leave it an impasse.

It went un reported because frankly US media's attention is elsewhere amidst Presidential Elections. Also it is a matter b/w India and Pakistan and US is not a party in anyway, so commentary while appreciated by India is ultimately as meaningless as Robin Raphael's statement on invalidity of instrument of accession was.

I am not so senseless to proclaim - there is no dispute and all is hunky dory. There is a dispute which includes all of erstwhile J&K and Northern Areas and the only parties to it according Shimla Agreement are India and Pakistan.