US Politics

[T-72M1]

I’m a strong supporter of superdelegates, imagine, if the Republican party had superdelegates, it would have been impossible for Trump to hijack their party.

you're advocating for totalitarianism, Trump is the will of the people.

 

[ultron]

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...piac-poll-florida-ohio-pennsylvania/87021744/

 

[ultron]

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/hill...p-tied-latest-national-poll/story?id=40571216

 

[RabzonKhan]

50-State Snapshot: Clinton Beats Trump, but It’s Close

Cameron Easley | July 14, 2016

If the presidential election were held today, Hillary Clinton would top Donald Trump 320-212 in electoral votes to clinch the White House, according to an extensive Morning Consult analysis of 57,000 voters. That electoral count is only slightly less favorable to Democrats than the count in the 2012 election, when President Obama won the Electoral College 332-206.

The 2016 presidential race is far from over, however. Morning Consult’s polling data is within 2 percentage points in eight key states. Iowa is not included in the electoral count because it is a statistical dead heat.

The other close states are Florida, Georgia, Maine, Michigan, New Hampshire, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. When those states are removed from the electoral count, Clinton garners 241 electoral votes and Trump receives 190. If Trump wins a few of those states, he could come out on top.

The analysis uses the opinions of 57,000 registered voters collected from April through June in tandem with a variety of demographic characteristics in each state, such as age, gender, and President Obama’s approval rating, to determine how the race would look now.

The research shows movement in a number of states since Morning Consult’s previous in-depth analysis.

In the Midwest, Trump is gaining ground. In April, Clinton led Trump by 2 percentage points in Ohio, but now the Buckeye State leans toward the GOP nominee. Clinton also earlier held a slim lead in Iowa, but that race is now a pure tossup, with both candidates receiving 40.1 percent of the vote.

Wisconsin is also trending toward Trump. In Indiana, Trump has made major gains against Clinton; he has increased his lead there by 9 percentage points.

In the West, Nevada has moved to the left as the general-election phase of the campaign has kicked into gear.

And while much of the map in the South looks typically Republican, Georgia is shifting toward Clinton, where voters were firmly in Trump’s camp in April. The state now leans toward the former secretary of State, albeit within the margin of error. Read more

you're advocating for totalitarianism, Trump is the will of the people.

Sorry to say, but Trump is a sham, he is not a Republican, and his whole agenda is, by hook or by crook, to become the president of United States.

As the former president of United States, Dwight Eisenhower, once said, “a political party without principles is nothing more than a conspiracy to seize power”.

The reasons that the Democrats adopted the superdelegate system was to preserve the core values of the party, protect the party against a outsider takeover (that was the main reason majority of superdelegates supported Hillary), and, in the worst scenario, vote against a candidate whom the party establishment feels lacks electability. After all, the whole process of primaries is to elect the best candidate who can win the White House.

 

[ultron]

It don't matter who leads nationally. The election will be decided by a few swing states. Florida. Ohio. Pennsylvania. Iowa. Who wins the swing states will win the election. The winner of a state gets all of that state's count.

RNC killed the rebel Never Trump movement

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...trump-movement-to-unbind-delegates-votes.html

 

[RoadRunner401]

you're advocating for totalitarianism, Trump is the will of the people.

Will of the people? is that why Canadian government website for immigration to Canada was crashed by the Americans.

 

[RabzonKhan]

Banning Muslims from entering the United States, and his strong opposition to free-trade agreements are considered the most important policies of his presidential campaign.

And now Trump has selected Indiana Gov. Mike Pence as his running mate, now, why the hell would he want someone as his VP who is totally against his two most important policies?

Told you, he is a sham and has no principles, and his real agenda is, by hook or by crook, to seize power.

https://twitter.com/x/status/753965070003109888

His VP:

https://twitter.com/x/status/674249808610066433

Trump compares trade deals to rape. He says that trans-pacific partnership was “just a continuing rape of our country”.

His VP:

https://twitter.com/x/status/509032682555457536

 

[ultron]

Banning Muslims from entering the United States, and his strong opposition to free-trade agreements are considered the most important policies of his presidential campaign.

And now Trump has selected Indiana Gov. Mike Pence as his running mate, now, why the hell would he want someone as his VP who is totally against his two most important policies?

Told you, he is a sham and has no principles, and his real agenda is, by hook or by crook, to seize power.


View attachment 318072

https://twitter.com/x/status/753965070003109888

View attachment 318073

His VP:

https://twitter.com/x/status/674249808610066433

Trump compares trade deals to rape. He says that trans-pacific partnership was “just a continuing rape of our country”.

His VP:

https://twitter.com/x/status/509032682555457536

Maybe Mike Pence changed his stance. That rhymes.

 

[RabzonKhan]

Maybe Mike Pence changed his stance. That rhymes.

Really, when did that happen, any source?

 

[ultron]

Really, when did that happen, any source?

Mike Pence is a hardcore racist. After many terror attacks, it's not surprising he change his stance, no?

 

[Aero]

Really, when did that happen, any source?

Then you also can't say Trump changed his stance.

 

[RabzonKhan]

Mike Pence is a hardcore racist. After many terror attacks, it's not surprising he change his stance, no?

He is also a racist, wow, did not know that, thanks for the info.

Then you also can't say Trump changed his stance.

Sorry did not understand what you are trying to say.

 

[Aero]

He is also a racist, wow, did not know that, thanks for the info.


Sorry did not understand what you are trying to say.

As you were asking source for Mike Pence's stance change.
I meant to say whether or not Mike Pence changed his stance that does not imply Trump changed his stance.

 

[T-72M1]

http://thehill.com/homenews/house/287845-democrats-freaked-out-about-polls-in-meeting-with-clinton

http://thesop.org/story/20160714/be...llary-zero-times-during-23-minute-speech.html

 

[RabzonKhan]

It don't matter who leads nationally. The election will be decided by a few swing states. Florida. Ohio. Pennsylvania. Iowa. Who wins the swing states will win the election. The winner of a state gets all of that state's count.

RNC killed the rebel Never Trump movement

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...trump-movement-to-unbind-delegates-votes.html

According to RealClear Politics, Hillary has 209 electoral votes -vs- Trump 164. Link

NPR, gives Hillary 201 electoral votes-vs-Trump 163. Link

So even if Trump wins, Florida (29 electoral votes), Ohio(18), Pennsylvania(20) and Iowa(6), total 73 electoral votes, plus Trumps 164 electoral votes comes to a total of 237 electoral votes, to win he needs 270 electoral vote.

On the other hand, if Hillary wins all these four states, then the game will be over.

I think the battleground states are, Colorado, Florida, Iowa, Michigan, Nevada, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia and Wisconsin.

As you were asking source for Mike Pence's stance change.
I meant to say whether or not Mike Pence changed his stance that does not imply Trump changed his stance.

My point was why would he want someone as his VP who is totally against two of his most important policies? Why didn’t he find someone who supports his core policies?

The irony is that his VP’s views on the ban on Muslims, and free trade are closer to Hillary’s positions, now think of it, how embarrassing it would be for Trump to criticize Hillary on these issues?