What's new

US Politics

--"Vladimir Putin, Russians cheer Donald Trump's victory," Washington Times
--"
Surprise! Trump was a Putin puppet all along," Daily Kos
--"
For Russia and Putin, a Surprise Gift From America," New York Times
--"
How Vladimir Putin won the US election," AOL News
--"
Putin gains Trump card in geopolitical poker game," Reuters
These are nothing but sensationalist Leftist media propaganda headlines. Sure, the Russians (and the whole world) are happy that there will now be someone in the White House with whom they can reason with, unlike Obama and Hillary who wanted to start a nuclear war with Russia over some "moderate" terrorists in Syria.

Also, the first foreign head of state to congratulate Trump was Sissi of Egypt who called in. Putin gave his congratulations as well, but it was no different from the congratulations other head of states gave to Trump so this bullsh!t media needs to shut its trap.
 
.
Electoral college voting against Trump (mid december) will have no effect long run....because Congress has to vote on the electoral college decision in early January and they can effectively veto any potential EC shenanigans if it happens en masse (past a few faithless electors that dont change the result).

EC voting against trump (and against what the people voted for in their states) will just be a stalling tactic at best if they do that....and much of the establishment will open themselves up to massive litigation and even more punitive action from Trump once he does get in.

Its a free world and Putin can continue to keep saying whatever he wants.

These are nothing but sensationalist Leftist media propaganda headlines. Sure, the Russians (and the whole world) are happy that there will now be someone in the White House with whom they can reason with, unlike Obama and Hillary who wanted to start a nuclear war with Russia over some "moderate" terrorists in Syria.

Also, the first foreign head of state to congratulate Trump was Sissi of Egypt who called in. Putin gave his congratulations as well, but it was no different from the congratulations other head of states gave to Trump so this bullsh!t media needs to shut its trap.


President Putin looks nasty, LOL. :tup:

 
.
Wow @US neo-fascist media.
Dont understand them.2 years ago Obama said that we are just a regional power, with no friends, no allies and now they are crying bcs somehow we manipulate their elections.We are just a former superpower which can't produce anything, we cant do such a stuff to the sole superpower.:p:
 
.
Dont understand them.2 years ago Obama said that we are just a regional power, with no friends, no allies and now they are crying bcs somehow we manipulate their elections.We are just a former superpower which can't produce anything, we cant do such a stuff to the sole superpower.:p:

Russia is the enemy of convenience.

It is a monster about to gobble up the West, when they need demonization.

Yet, it is also just a regular small power of a long gone empire. I think all is political talk to feed the masses as the situation requires.

Shows the level and quality of governance in that part of the world. The elite is not really concerned about informing citizens. They are concerned about maintaining their own class interests. Hence, in this case, truth and logic become secondary.
 
.
I think from the US perspective , Russia is a threat to europe by its haggin' of the european far right skinheads , it's just a bunch of russians trying to influence people in europe by the very far right propaganda that US exports herself , and you can find on sites like stormfront , the non-american version of de-KKKed white supramicy ideology
 
. .
stacked-logo.png


Trump Victory Sparks Mental Health Crisis Among Dejected Dems
Colleges offering trauma care

Demonstrators holds banners as they protest during a march in downtown Washington in opposition of President-elect Donald Trump / AP


BY: Adam Kredo
November 14, 2016 3:05 pm

Liberal voters psychologically disturbed by the election of Donald Trump are seeking out care from mental health professionals, while colleges across the country seek to help students facing similar mental health crises in the wake of Trump’s surprise victory, according to interviews and reports.

Mental health professionals practicing in Washington, D.C. described an unprecedented increase in patients worried about the country’s future as a result of Trump’s victory over Democratic contender Hillary Clinton.

“This is very different,” said David Sternberg, founder and director of D.C. Talk Therapy, a psychotherapy group that practices in the District’s upscale Woodley Park neighborhood.

“This is pretty unprecedented,” Sternberg said, explaining that patients are expressing feelings of “anger, frustration, anxiety, [and] sadness.”

“A lot of current patients and clients have wanted to talk about the election,” he said, adding that moods are “the reverse” of what many patients felt in 2008 after the election of Barack Obama.

The election-season issues are also being felt on college campuses across the country, as many higher learning institutions offer mental health resources to students stunned by Trump’s victory.

George Mason University, located in the Virginia suburbs just outside of D.C., established a “healing space” on campus the day after Trump was declared the winner, according to campus-wide communications obtained by the Washington Free Beacon.

The university also posted “staff members” to a post-election event to “to provide support and refer students to campus resources, as needed,” according to a separate email sent to university students and faculty.

Many other prominent universities and colleges provided students with mental health resources and so-called “safe spaces” for healing.

One prominent Democratic operative informed the Free Beacon that many in D.C.’s elite political ranks have been traumatized by the election result, with some even forming support groups.

“For these people, they really are shocked,” said the source, who declined to be identified due to the sensitivity of the issue. “It’s really a problem for them.”

These Democratic support groups aim to “to create a safe space” where participants can “express their feelings to each other,” explained the source, who recalled dejected Democratic players breaking “out into tears” during last Tuesday’s election.

“Prime real estate was already booked at some of the most in-demand spots in Washington,” the source added. “I’m sure there are a few people who got ball gowns and had to send them back.”

“Going into Tuesday night, we had all carefully planned out victory parties to celebrate,” said the Democratic operative. “But late into the evening, it became more of a wake then a party. Every time I hear the phrase President-elect Trump I can’t believe it. I feel like I’m living in an alternate universe. The dream I was expecting of welcoming President Hillary Clinton has become the nightmare of President Donald Trump.”

Surprise, outrage, and anguish also have gripped Jewish communities across the country, which overwhelmingly supported Clinton.

One Jewish-majority organization, We’ve Seen This Before, started a petition to support minority groups that are purportedly “threatened by the president-elect and his administration.”

“American Jews are a multiracial and multiethnic community, and 76 percent of us voted against Donald Trump,” the group wrote in an open letter posted online. “We voted against him because we know all too well the dangers of fascistic regimes that rise to power through stigmatization and scapegoating of vulnerable minority populations. And we felt—in our bodies and in our bones—that Trump was presenting a vision of the country completely at odds with our Jewish and American values.”
 
. .
Fred Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu became good friends in the 1980s. Donald Trump hired Steve Bannon who is an exec at Breibart. Breitbart was founded by Andrew Breitbart who was a Jewish Zionist. Donald Trump says he will be the first president to recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel. All 8 of Donald Trump's grand kids are Jewish.
 
.
How Donald Trump Is Bringing the Alt-Right to the White House

The former media mogul is Trump's link to the right-wing fringe

Personnel is policy, runs the old Washington saying. Which is why Republicans and Democrats alike are studying Donald Trump’s staff hires for clues of how the President-elect will govern. And so far one name sticks out: Steve Bannon, who was named Sunday as Trump’s chief strategist and senior counselor.

In one respect, Bannon’s appointment is not a surprise: he was already a member of Trump’s innermost circle, serving since late summer as chief executive of the businessman’s campaign. But in many others, Bannon is an unorthodox, even startling hire.

Trump’s new top White House adviser is best known as a purveyor of right-wing agitprop. As boss of Breitbart News, Bannon helped nurture the populist uprising that swept Trump to victory in the Republican primaries. He has battled for years to transform the GOP into a more hard-edged party and given voice to some of the unsavory forces floating around its fringe, including a resurgence of white nationalism.

Bannon took an unusual route to the West Wing. Born in Virginia to a family of working-class Democrats, he served a stint in the Navy, earned an MBA at Harvard and became a banker at
Goldman Sachs. From there he launched a boutique investment bank that specialized in media—he walked away from one lucrative deal with royalties from Seinfeld—and began to moonlight as a Hollywood producer. About a decade ago, he began making conservative films, including hagiographic documentaries about the Tea Party and Sarah Palin. His entreé into Breitbart came when he loaned office space in Los Angeles to the site’s namesake.

Bannon built Breitbart into a right-wing juggernaut. He did it by serving up an acid brand of ethno-nationalism that attacks Republicans nearly as much as it does Democrats. Breitbart opposes illegal immigration, global trade deals, cultural progressives and Washington cronyism. The site often targets GOP leaders it sees as insufficiently conservative, helping to oust former House Majority Leader Eric Cantor and hounding former Speaker John Boehner to quit. This year it has pumped out a steady stream of articles attacking Paul Ryan, Boehner’s successor.

It would be one thing if Breitbart were merely arch-conservative. What worries many Republicans is the way it has given a voice to fringe groups. “We’re the platform for the alt-right,” Bannon boasted to Mother Jonesmagazine in July, referring to the rising right-wing movement that includes anti-Semites and proponents of white nationalism.

Critics say Breitbart’s coverage is shot through with racism, xenophobia and misogyny. Under Bannon’s editorial direction, it has accused Planned Parenthood of perpetuating a “Holocaust” by performing abortions. The site targets women (sample headlines: “There’s No Hiring Bias Against Women in Tech, They Just Suck at Interviews”; “Birth Control Makes Women Unattractive and Crazy”; “The Solution to Online ‘Harassment’ is Simple: Women Should Log Off.”). It mocks the LGBT community (“Lesbian Bridezillas Bully Bridal Shop Over Religious Beliefs”). It foments fears about Muslim refugees (“Twin Falls Refugee Rape Special Report: Why are the Refugees Moving In?”).

Breitbart has played up the prospects of a looming “race war” between whites and blacks. It often vilifies Black Lives Matter protesters. It promotes far-right parties across Europe. It published a piece whose headline called conservative pundit and Trump foe Bill Kristol a “renegade Jew.” Bannon himself has been accused of anti-Semitism. In a 2007 court filing, Bannon’s ex-wife alleged that he made anti-Semitic remarks and did not want his daughters “going to school with Jews,” according to multiple media outlets that reviewed the documents. (A spokesperson for Bannon has denied he made the comments.)

Some former employees describe Bannon as a combative and vindictive figure. “He is legitimately one of the worst people I’ve ever dealt with,” former Breitbart writer Ben Shapiro told TIME after Trump hired Bannon. “He regularly abuses people. He sees everything as a war. Every time he feels crossed, he makes it his business to destroy his opponent.”

Kurt Bardella, a former Breitbart spokesman, told TIME that Bannon would often launch into “provocative, expletive-laced tirades about any demographic group you can possibly think of. That’s just how Steve is.”

Trump has mostly staffed his presidential transition team with veteran lobbyists and policymakers, the same Washington figures he campaigned against. That cheered many Republicans, who hope that after a combative campaign, the non-ideological President-elect might govern as a moderate. But Bannon’s perch at the top echelons of the White House is a clear sign that Trump plans to maintain links to the forces that propelled him into power.

“The racist, fascist extreme right is represented footsteps from the Oval Office,” tweeted GOP strategist John Weaver.
“Be very vigilant America.”
 
.
There is nothing to apologise for and,CERTAINLY,there is nothing to discuss with the zombies protesting right now.These people are brainwashed,they are extremists and ,first of all,they're the first who don't want to compromise their ideology with othere.They think they have the absolute truth and the only solution for you is to bow to the warped image they have of this world.This is who they are,they're the product of this (and no,the Russians didn't do it,they just know the tecnique):


These people are just as fanatic and dangerous like the KKK types.Just like a clan member can't be convinced that a non white is a person like them,you just can't convince these leftist extremists that their world isn't the perfect world.But,I was wrong earlier,they're not as dangerous as the KKK ,they're FAR MORE dangerous because the KKK is on the fringe,we see them as crazies while these zombies are promoted as normal by the MSM.
Dude I want the protests to end just as much as you do and the only way to end them is if trump offers an apology for his remarks.What other way is there?
 
. .
Dude I want the protests to end just as much as you do and the only way to end them is if trump offers an apology for his remarks.What other way is there?
No apologies here for intolerant leftist brats.

It's simple: if they can't tolerate free-speech then they should move to North Korea.

How Donald Trump Is Bringing the Alt-Right to the White House

The former media mogul is Trump's link to the right-wing fringe

Personnel is policy, runs the old Washington saying. Which is why Republicans and Democrats alike are studying Donald Trump’s staff hires for clues of how the President-elect will govern. And so far one name sticks out: Steve Bannon, who was named Sunday as Trump’s chief strategist and senior counselor.

In one respect, Bannon’s appointment is not a surprise: he was already a member of Trump’s innermost circle, serving since late summer as chief executive of the businessman’s campaign. But in many others, Bannon is an unorthodox, even startling hire.

Trump’s new top White House adviser is best known as a purveyor of right-wing agitprop. As boss of Breitbart News, Bannon helped nurture the populist uprising that swept Trump to victory in the Republican primaries. He has battled for years to transform the GOP into a more hard-edged party and given voice to some of the unsavory forces floating around its fringe, including a resurgence of white nationalism.

Bannon took an unusual route to the West Wing. Born in Virginia to a family of working-class Democrats, he served a stint in the Navy, earned an MBA at Harvard and became a banker at
Goldman Sachs. From there he launched a boutique investment bank that specialized in media—he walked away from one lucrative deal with royalties from Seinfeld—and began to moonlight as a Hollywood producer. About a decade ago, he began making conservative films, including hagiographic documentaries about the Tea Party and Sarah Palin. His entreé into Breitbart came when he loaned office space in Los Angeles to the site’s namesake.

Bannon built Breitbart into a right-wing juggernaut. He did it by serving up an acid brand of ethno-nationalism that attacks Republicans nearly as much as it does Democrats. Breitbart opposes illegal immigration, global trade deals, cultural progressives and Washington cronyism. The site often targets GOP leaders it sees as insufficiently conservative, helping to oust former House Majority Leader Eric Cantor and hounding former Speaker John Boehner to quit. This year it has pumped out a steady stream of articles attacking Paul Ryan, Boehner’s successor.

It would be one thing if Breitbart were merely arch-conservative. What worries many Republicans is the way it has given a voice to fringe groups. “We’re the platform for the alt-right,” Bannon boasted to Mother Jonesmagazine in July, referring to the rising right-wing movement that includes anti-Semites and proponents of white nationalism.

Critics say Breitbart’s coverage is shot through with racism, xenophobia and misogyny. Under Bannon’s editorial direction, it has accused Planned Parenthood of perpetuating a “Holocaust” by performing abortions. The site targets women (sample headlines: “There’s No Hiring Bias Against Women in Tech, They Just Suck at Interviews”; “Birth Control Makes Women Unattractive and Crazy”; “The Solution to Online ‘Harassment’ is Simple: Women Should Log Off.”). It mocks the LGBT community (“Lesbian Bridezillas Bully Bridal Shop Over Religious Beliefs”). It foments fears about Muslim refugees (“Twin Falls Refugee Rape Special Report: Why are the Refugees Moving In?”).

Breitbart has played up the prospects of a looming “race war” between whites and blacks. It often vilifies Black Lives Matter protesters. It promotes far-right parties across Europe. It published a piece whose headline called conservative pundit and Trump foe Bill Kristol a “renegade Jew.” Bannon himself has been accused of anti-Semitism. In a 2007 court filing, Bannon’s ex-wife alleged that he made anti-Semitic remarks and did not want his daughters “going to school with Jews,” according to multiple media outlets that reviewed the documents. (A spokesperson for Bannon has denied he made the comments.)

Some former employees describe Bannon as a combative and vindictive figure. “He is legitimately one of the worst people I’ve ever dealt with,” former Breitbart writer Ben Shapiro told TIME after Trump hired Bannon. “He regularly abuses people. He sees everything as a war. Every time he feels crossed, he makes it his business to destroy his opponent.”

Kurt Bardella, a former Breitbart spokesman, told TIME that Bannon would often launch into “provocative, expletive-laced tirades about any demographic group you can possibly think of. That’s just how Steve is.”

Trump has mostly staffed his presidential transition team with veteran lobbyists and policymakers, the same Washington figures he campaigned against. That cheered many Republicans, who hope that after a combative campaign, the non-ideological President-elect might govern as a moderate. But Bannon’s perch at the top echelons of the White House is a clear sign that Trump plans to maintain links to the forces that propelled him into power.

“The racist, fascist extreme right is represented footsteps from the Oval Office,” tweeted GOP strategist John Weaver.
“Be very vigilant America.”
So Trump's bringing Nazis to the White house? :rofl::cheesy: Good. I hope they give the moronic left a good drubbing. My my have the tables turned.

Personally, I'm sick and tired of identical politics. Male this. Female that. This race. That race. This religion. That religion. This sexual orientation. That sexual orientation. It's all bullshit. It's absolutely crazy.
You can thank Obummer and his coalition of sh!tlibs for racializing American politics.

Instead of voting for people based on merit, the left has started a trend of voting people into public offices simply for the color of their skin or their gender or whatever other social category that makes them a "minority"; the "first Black President", the "first Latino" President, the "first woman" President, the "first Transgender" President, the "first homosexual" President, the "first pedophile" President, the "first Latino woman" President, in other words as long as its not a heterosexual White male (which all of America's founding fathers were mind you), then lets just vote the most obscure, deranged, incompetent people into office simply because they are from a "minority" group.

This whole "left wing" vs "right wing" politics were mostly confined to Europe where they have a history of extreme left wing regimes and right wing governments. America for the most part has always been economically and politically Liberal (the original Liberalism of America's founding fathers, not the modern "Liberalism" of the deranged left).

But now thanks to Leftist morons American politics have become racialized. And as always the left will never acknowledge its own wrongs, and this will only continue to push more Americans towards the Right wing.
 
.

Quit Whining, Liberals. You Brought Trump on Yourselves
unnamed-42.sized-50x50xf.jpg

BY TYLER O'NEIL NOVEMBER 11, 2016
AP_16155142524579.sized-770x415xc.jpg

(AP Photo/Jae C. Hong)
It barely took 24 hours for liberals to start protesting Donald Trump's victory on Tuesday. In fact, students walked out of school Wednesday morning and riots began in earnest that evening. But if liberals wanted to protest someone for Trump's success, they should be protesting themselves. In many ways, the Left brought Trump on the country, and it was completely avoidable if they had been just a little more reasonable.

Much has been written about the conservative media bubble, and not without reason. But a similar — and more pernicious — phenomenon is happening on the Left, and it is happening in the very seats of intellectual power. Liberals in the universities, the media, and the Democrat Party are largely responsible for Trump, and their echo chamber is so insulated they can barely see it.

Here are four ways American liberals brought Trump on themselves. If they want to protest someone, they should look in the mirror.


1. Enforcing political correctness.

Readers of PJ Media are likely familiar with the explosion of political correctness on college campuses. While the trend traces much further back, the recent fracas reached a fever pitch in the fall of last year: students complained that Halloween costumes constituted "cultural appropriation" and "microaggressions." The very idea of a microaggression — where speech or actions not intended to be insulting can be interpreted that way anyway — is arguably anti-free speech. But students took the idea and ran with it, demanding censorship.

From then on, things just started getting worse. A state university had a "stop white people" event for RA training. Racially segregated housing is making a comeback — only now it's black dorms ruled off limits to white people. Last month, University of California-Berkeley students formed a blockade to keep white people from using a bridge. Oh, and if you even disagree with "safe spaces," you're a white supremacist.

Students are being taught the ills of Western culture and history, but not its many positive contributions. Most college students now even think Americans invented slavery, an institution as old as history and universal in all developed cultures until Christians abolished it, twice, and starting in the West.

Given these recent events, is it any wonder that a group of young white males — constantly preached to about their "privilege" and the evils of their ancestors — are asserting themselves? The alt-right is racist and evil, but it is a backlash against the racial slant of today's political correctness.

Donald Trump's greatest strength — and his greatest sin in the eyes of liberals — was his much-vaunted ability to "tell it like it is." He was not afraid to say the politically incorrect thing, launching his campaign by calling many Mexican illegal immigrants rapists. Following the death of Kate Steinle two weeks beforehand, his immigration declarations struck a nerve.

If the Republican electorate wanted an anti-establishment candidate, they had a few to choose from. They did not have to vote for a man who had donated to Hillary Clinton's campaign in 2008 and who recently supported universal healthcare. They could have supported Ted Cruz, who was a true conservative, anti-establishment, and didn't have Trump's baggage. Of course, he didn't have Trump's name recognition either...

But the liberals were most scared of Donald Trump. Not only did he say unacceptable things, he was already a household name. Ted Cruz scared them, but Trump disgusted them, and Republicans loved that.

There was another reason political correctness helped Trump win. After Obergefell v. Hodges legalized gay marriage, conservatives became terrified that the Supreme Court would further enshrine liberal ideas into American law. The sudden emphasis on "transgender rights" further reminded conservatives that they had to fight back. Even those who would not have supported Trump normally voted for him to ensure a conservative Supreme Court, and political correctness convinced them it was now or never.


2. Crying wolf about Republican candidates.

Mitt Romney was "out of touch," a heartless millionaire, and responsible for his employee's death from cancer. Long before Trump attacked John McCain for being captured, liberals denigrated his military service in 2008. George W. Bush was a "fascist."

This month, Bill Maher admitted it was "wrong" to cry wolf about previous Republican candidates. After Democrats and liberals had called Bush a "fascist" when he clearly wasn't anything of the sort, it meant next to nothing when they said the same thing about Donald Trump, even though the label arguably fits him better.

Even President Obama was at a loss for words when attacking Trump. The president was forced to admit that he considered Trump in a different league than the other two Republicans he himself defeated. He argued that he "never thought" Romney and McCain couldn't do the job, but he considered Trump unfit.

After crying wolf so many times in the past, however, liberals had no credibility when they used hyperbole to attack Trump. Indeed, these attacks seemed more likely to convince Republicans that Trump actually was one of them, a conservative who scared liberals because he would stand up for their values.

In the primary, conservative arguments against him fell on deaf ears, because liberals were so scared. Only a true conservative warrior could achieve that, and so many who might have been skeptical otherwise jumped on the Trump train.

As a conservative who firmly got on the Romney bandwagon in 2012, I found myself unable to trust Trump. Yes, he is better than Hillary Clinton would have been, but will a man whose political principles seem to change with the wind prove to be a conservative warrior in the White House? I can only hope so. But liberals can take the credit for convincing my fellow Republicans he was the savior they were looking for.


3. Planting operatives to cause chaos.

Last month, Project Veritas released a bombshell video about the violence at Trump rallies. The Clinton campaign and Democratic Party operatives planned to incite that violence, and it backfired.

The Democrats intended that violence to dissuade Trump supporters and convince most Americans that there was something very wrong with him. Instead, it merely convinced millions of Americans that Trump stands for something, in spite of strong opposition. Just as liberal attacks that Trump is a "fascist" convinced Republicans that he was their champion, so the violence at his rallies convinced Americans he was a real political force.

Once again, the Democrat attack backfired, and liberals themselves are responsible for Trump's political success.


4. Allowing the media to prostrate themselves.

In the Republican primary, Donald Trump received over $1.9 billion in media coverage. In any primary, a key feature is name recognition — voters won't choose a candidate they've never heard of. Trump consistently led in this category, and the media coverage only helped his lead over other Republicans.

FiveThirtyEight's Nate Silver analyzed three kinds of news stories: reports of Trump's high poll numbers, tales of Trump beating the Republican "establishment," and astonished reports of Trump saying unbelievable things.

Reports of Trump's inflammatory comments were presented as likely damning his candidacy, yet each poll showed Trump ahead of other candidates. These astonished poll reports left Republicans with the impression that he had beaten the "establishment," and that "telling it like it is" made him an electable candidate. Many of these polling reports emphasized that people viewed Trump as "electable," but did not focus on his negative favorable ratings.

The media coverage — not necessarily intended to prop up Trump, and even occasionally intended to destroy his candidacy — actually had the result of creating a hero in the minds of Republicans who distrusted the media and the "establishment." $1.9 billion can make a sensation out of anyone, and Trump was already a household name.

Just like liberals crying wolf, the breathless media coverage of Trump convinced many Republicans that he was a heroic underdog, consistently winning despite everything thrown against him.

Why did the media cover Trump so much? One word: ratings. The media chases its audience, and Trump attracted attention. Higher ratings and Internet traffic enables outlets to charge more for advertising, and so it was in their interest to cover stories which attract attention.

TV news even went so far as to stream Trump's speeches and rallies live — an unprecedented move which gave both Trump and news outlets more attention. It was a win-win, and while many feared they were "selling their souls" for ratings, they were also delivering people the stories which interested them most.

There are many, many reasons Trump defeated Clinton on Tuesday, and books will undoubtedly cover them in detail. But liberals and Democrats have themselves to blame for many of them.

Further protesting and rioting is likely to only make Trump stronger, and if he proves to be even a partially decent president, liberals will have to eat so much crow, Trump will likely become a true misunderstood American hero. But it's not like liberals were silenced — they made him, and now they have to live with him.
 
.


The butt hurt is still strong. Why is no one surprised that Hillary supporters get their news from these retarded liberal comedians? Quick... post something from Buzzfeed, MTV or Chelsea Handler :lol:


I'm still balling at the fact that all the cocky Hillary supporters and the media thought they were not only going to beat Trump but "crush him". That would explain why they started crying like little children and after that ironically the racial attacks both verbal and physical started.
 
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom