What's new

US Politics

After Trump's 2nd term, Pence would run as VP. Pence looks like that creepy preacher guy in Poltergeist 2.



LMAO after a very long day, the second half off your comment honestly made my night :lol:


Speaking of comments, this thread is really turning into some serious entertainment Quality Gold. :pleasantry:
 
After Mr Trump’s victory this week, the main Syrian opposition group the Syrian National Coalition (SNC) reached out to his staff asking him to protect civilians.
Trump should respond by carpet bombing all their friends and families.
 
Personally, I'm sick and tired of identical politics. Male this. Female that. This race. That race. This religion. That religion. This sexual orientation. That sexual orientation. It's all bullshit. It's absolutely crazy.
 
You tried it in Afghanistan how did that turn out?
nope, NATO fought like sissies in Afghanistan, so many vids of taliban just dumping their guns and walking away from firefights with groups of children as cover, and US forces would just curse while having them in their sights.

I don't expect Trump to go against the Geneva conventions, but it would be great if he did. Kill terrorist families, make sure there is no second generation.
 
nope, NATO fought like sissies in Afghanistan, so many vids of taliban just dumping their guns and walking away from firefights with groups of children as cover, and US forces would just curse while having them in their sights.

I don't expect Trump to go against the Geneva conventions, but it would be great if he did. Kill terrorist families, make sure there is no second generation.

Maybe you were confusing them for the retarded coward arab isis...

How is a 5 year old particularly a terrorist family?

The Talibs pretty much kicked ***... armed with nothing but a AK and a rudimentary rpg.

They will fight for 1000 years.... Do you even know what the word Afghan means?
 
How is a 5 year old particularly a terrorist family?

The Talibs pretty much kicked ***... armed with nothing but a AK and a rudimentary rpg.

They will fight for 1000 years.... Do you even know what the ward Afghan means?
if there are terrorists hanging around 5 year olds, then those 5 year olds should be expendable. Take Syria for example, where the terrorists hide among civvie populations and blame the forces when there are casualties.

US fight with hands tied behind their back, these rats are otherwise no match for them.

Trump is right, go after their families. I don't know if he will but the idea is right.

also, your ninja edit failed, haha @Clutch outed as a Taliban fan boy ! :haha:
 
if there are terrorists hanging around 5 year olds, then those 5 year olds should be expendable. Take Syria for example, where the terrorists hide among civvie populations and blame the forces when there are casualties.

US fight with hands tied behind their back, these rats are otherwise no match for them.

Trump is right, go after their families. I don't know if he will but the idea is right.


I guess that too was the logic of the 9/11 hijackers... well if there are people in those building those suckers are expendable.... ?

Lol... welcome to Afghanistan... I'll grab a bag of pop corn.... Live leak would be worth visiting again.

if there are terrorists hanging around 5 year olds, then those 5 year olds should be expendable. Take Syria for example, where the terrorists hide among civvie populations and blame the forces when there are casualties.

US fight with hands tied behind their back, these rats are otherwise no match for them.

Trump is right, go after their families. I don't know if he will but the idea is right.

also, your ninja edit failed, haha @Clutch outed as a Taliban fan boy ! :haha:

Nah... just against Yankees in the neighbourhood...

Real my posts... blow back... is a bitch

if there are terrorists hanging around 5 year olds, then those 5 year olds should be expendable. Take Syria for example, where the terrorists hide among civvie populations and blame the forces when there are casualties.

US fight with hands tied behind their back, these rats are otherwise no match for them.

Trump is right, go after their families. I don't know if he will but the idea is right.

also, your ninja edit failed, haha @Clutch outed as a Taliban fan boy ! :haha:

Unless those 5 year old are blue eyes blond haired... let's say a terrorist in North Dakota hides behind a bus full of 5 year old blue eyes blond haired kids... blow the bus along with the terrorist?

I think you wouldnt wanna ... neither would I... but you are sectiive in your 5 year old...


Oh BTW... I am pro Trump. Read my past posts. I think he is the best think to ever happen to the USA. I really look forward to his neocon cabinet of John Bolton, Rudy Julian, newt Gingrich, my all time favourite Jose Rodriguez.... Go Team America.... And yes Sarah Palin... i hope she makes energy secatary.... Golly gee wiliker! :)
 
Last edited:
nope, NATO fought like sissies in Afghanistan, so many vids of taliban just dumping their guns and walking away from firefights with groups of children as cover, and US forces would just curse while having them in their sights.

I don't expect Trump to go against the Geneva conventions, but it would be great if he did. Kill terrorist families, make sure there is no second generation.
You cant bomb terrorist into submission unless you plan on occupying the territory they control for decades thats a childish view
 
Last edited:
Someone Should Tell Putin to Shut Up about Trump Lest He Prompt an Upset When the Electoral College Votes

Innocent comments are fueling the cause advanced by enemies of improved US-Russia relations.

William Dunkerley
Sat, Nov 12, 2016



Russian President Vladimir Putin congratulated Donald Trump for his election victory," said Newsweek. A Washington Post headline read, "Putin: 'Trump's first statements give us hope.'"

But these and other positively expectant statements seem to be backfiring on Putin. Look at the headlines that followed:

--"Vladimir Putin, Russians cheer Donald Trump's victory," Washington Times
--"
Surprise! Trump was a Putin puppet all along," Daily Kos
--"
For Russia and Putin, a Surprise Gift From America," New York Times
--"
How Vladimir Putin won the US election," AOL News
--"
Putin gains Trump card in geopolitical poker game," Reuters

There undoubtedly would have been negative news stories even if Putin had not been so publically pleased about Trump's victory. But his triumphalism gave his critics more ammunition.

It looks to me like the Kremlin is already overplaying its hand. There's nothing to be gained but much to be lost when Putin is broadcasting his joy over Trump's election. Somebody should put a sock in Putin's mouth. Let him keep his point of view to himself for now.

I can understand Putin's belief that Trump might be able to set US-Russia relations on a better course. But Trump was not crowned king and will have a lot of entrenched domestic opposition to deal with.

Putin should be mindful that better relations with Russia is not a top priority topic for Trump. To get congressional support for his pet plans he will have to get the cooperation of members of Congress. Many of them either receive significant financial support for being anti Russian or have a lot of past negative rhetoric to back away from.

It's not hard to imagine deal-maker Trump selling out Russia in order to get cooperation on matters he deems more important.

And then there's also the American government bureaucracy that is filled with people with deep convictions about how bad Putin and Russia are.

Achieving better US-Russia relations will be no cakewalk. It's doable but not easily or simply.

I'm told by a well-connected and reliable source that Putin's comments on Trump's election were well thought-out and carefully said. But what was "carefully said" was grist enough for the adversarial Western media. They blew it into big "news stories" that support the malicious allegations that played such a conspicuous role in the campaign.

These stories confirm to the disinterested or gullible American public all the Clintonite warnings that a treacherous Putin-Trump connection secretly exists. There's no defense for such lack of journalistic integrity in the cited stories. But it wouldn't take a rocket scientist to have seen this coming.

Perhaps leadership on the issue from Trump can turn this around. But I won't hold my breath. Putin, meanwhile, should hold his tongue.

And another thing: There seems to be an embryonic effort to bring about an upset when the Electoral College votes.

If Putin keeps wagging his tongue he might very well have an impact on who is ultimately sworn in as POTUS after all. Can't someone tell Putin and his cronies to shut up?

http://russia-insider.com/en/someon...pt-upset-when-electoral-college-votes/ri17543

**

Wow @US neo-fascist media.

@vostok , @BRICSFTW :mad::p:
 
Nah... just against Yankees in the neighbourhood...
yep, you'd much rather have the Talibs running thing in Afghanistan again.

blue eyes blond haired
plenty of "blue eyed blond haired" Syrians fighting with FSA, Nusra, Qaeda and ISIS etc

you are sectiive in your 5 year old...
My point was that all of them (bad guys) need to be wiped out, that there might be civvie casualties should be no reason to not drop those bombs like has been happening under a limp-wristed weak Obama admin, sorties returning with all the munitions still sitting nicely on the pylons because the chain of command went all the way up to Obama himself in many cases.

Oh BTW... I am pro Trump. Read my past posts. I think he is the best think to ever happen to the USA. I really look forward to his neocon cabinet of John Bolton, Rudy Julian, newt Gingrich, my all time favourite Jose Rodriguez.... Go Team America.... And yes Sarah Palin... i hope she makes energy secatary.... Golly gee wiliker! :)
He has to hire from the pool of talent that's available to him. I have no problem with him appointing the likes of John Bolton et all to important positions just as long as he remains his own man and overrules or dismisses their advice should they tell him to support the rebels or enforce a no fly zone to shoot down Russian planes etc.

Sarah Palin is not getting anything significant lol

You cant bomb terrorist into submission unless you plan on accoupying the territory they control for decades thats a childish view
A stronger more assertive US policy in the middle east, not the insanity of Bush, not the weak duplicitous acts of Obama.

stop support for the rebels, reign in Turkey, Saudia and Qatar etc, work with Russia, no more regime change, bomb ISIS into oblivion and retake all territory they control, all this is common sense and can be done.
 
yep, you'd much rather have the Talibs running thing in Afghanistan again.


plenty of "blue eyed blond haired" Syrians fighting with FSA, Nusra, Qaeda and ISIS etc


My point was that all of them (bad guys) need to be wiped out, that there might be civvie casualties should be no reason to not drop those bombs like has been happening under a limp-wristed weak Obama admin, sorties returning with all the munitions still sitting nicely on the pylons because the chain of command went all the way up to Obama himself in many cases.


He has to hire from the pool of talent that's available to him. I have no problem with him appointing the likes of John Bolton et all to important positions just as long as he remains his own man and overrules or dismisses their advice should they tell him to support the rebels or enforce a no fly zone to shoot down Russian planes etc.

Sarah Palin is not getting anything significant lol


A stronger more assertive US policy in the middle east, not the insanity of Bush, not the weak duplicitous acts of Obama.

stop support for the rebels, reign in Turkey, Saudia and Qatar etc, work with Russia, no more regime change, bomb ISIS into oblivion and retake all territory they control, all this is common sense and can be done.

Nah... not Syrian blonder.. Yankee doodle singing type...


Good luck with... our future is with china. ...Go Trump... i hope he bans all them crazie moslems... :)

Too bad the $50/hr steel jobs or pushing a button ain't coming back... and raju patel on h1b has the white collar one...
 
Someone Should Tell Putin to Shut Up about Trump Lest He Prompt an Upset When the Electoral College Votes

Innocent comments are fueling the cause advanced by enemies of improved US-Russia relations.

William Dunkerley
Sat, Nov 12, 2016



Russian President Vladimir Putin congratulated Donald Trump for his election victory," said Newsweek. A Washington Post headline read, "Putin: 'Trump's first statements give us hope.'"

But these and other positively expectant statements seem to be backfiring on Putin. Look at the headlines that followed:

--"Vladimir Putin, Russians cheer Donald Trump's victory," Washington Times
--"
Surprise! Trump was a Putin puppet all along," Daily Kos
--"
For Russia and Putin, a Surprise Gift From America," New York Times
--"
How Vladimir Putin won the US election," AOL News
--"
Putin gains Trump card in geopolitical poker game," Reuters

There undoubtedly would have been negative news stories even if Putin had not been so publically pleased about Trump's victory. But his triumphalism gave his critics more ammunition.

It looks to me like the Kremlin is already overplaying its hand. There's nothing to be gained but much to be lost when Putin is broadcasting his joy over Trump's election. Somebody should put a sock in Putin's mouth. Let him keep his point of view to himself for now.

I can understand Putin's belief that Trump might be able to set US-Russia relations on a better course. But Trump was not crowned king and will have a lot of entrenched domestic opposition to deal with.

Putin should be mindful that better relations with Russia is not a top priority topic for Trump. To get congressional support for his pet plans he will have to get the cooperation of members of Congress. Many of them either receive significant financial support for being anti Russian or have a lot of past negative rhetoric to back away from.

It's not hard to imagine deal-maker Trump selling out Russia in order to get cooperation on matters he deems more important.

And then there's also the American government bureaucracy that is filled with people with deep convictions about how bad Putin and Russia are.

Achieving better US-Russia relations will be no cakewalk. It's doable but not easily or simply.

I'm told by a well-connected and reliable source that Putin's comments on Trump's election were well thought-out and carefully said. But what was "carefully said" was grist enough for the adversarial Western media. They blew it into big "news stories" that support the malicious allegations that played such a conspicuous role in the campaign.

These stories confirm to the disinterested or gullible American public all the Clintonite warnings that a treacherous Putin-Trump connection secretly exists. There's no defense for such lack of journalistic integrity in the cited stories. But it wouldn't take a rocket scientist to have seen this coming.

Perhaps leadership on the issue from Trump can turn this around. But I won't hold my breath. Putin, meanwhile, should hold his tongue.

And another thing: There seems to be an embryonic effort to bring about an upset when the Electoral College votes.

If Putin keeps wagging his tongue he might very well have an impact on who is ultimately sworn in as POTUS after all. Can't someone tell Putin and his cronies to shut up?

http://russia-insider.com/en/someon...pt-upset-when-electoral-college-votes/ri17543

**

Wow @US neo-fascist media.

@vostok , @BRICSFTW :mad::p:

Electoral college voting against Trump (mid december) will have no effect long run....because Congress has to vote on the electoral college decision in early January and they can effectively veto any potential EC shenanigans if it happens en masse (past a few faithless electors that dont change the result).

EC voting against trump (and against what the people voted for in their states) will just be a stalling tactic at best if they do that....and much of the establishment will open themselves up to massive litigation and even more punitive action from Trump once he does get in.

Its a free world and Putin can continue to keep saying whatever he wants.
 
yep, you'd much rather have the Talibs running thing in Afghanistan again.


plenty of "blue eyed blond haired" Syrians fighting with FSA, Nusra, Qaeda and ISIS etc


My point was that all of them (bad guys) need to be wiped out, that there might be civvie casualties should be no reason to not drop those bombs like has been happening under a limp-wristed weak Obama admin, sorties returning with all the munitions still sitting nicely on the pylons because the chain of command went all the way up to Obama himself in many cases.


He has to hire from the pool of talent that's available to him. I have no problem with him appointing the likes of John Bolton et all to important positions just as long as he remains his own man and overrules or dismisses their advice should they tell him to support the rebels or enforce a no fly zone to shoot down Russian planes etc.

Sarah Palin is not getting anything significant lol


A stronger more assertive US policy in the middle east, not the insanity of Bush, not the weak duplicitous acts of Obama.

stop support for the rebels, reign in Turkey, Saudia and Qatar etc, work with Russia, no more regime change, bomb ISIS into oblivion and retake all territory they control, all this is common sense and can be done.
Obama.s policy was weak wtf he destroyed Middle East because of a hawkish policy

Nope the best policy for US would be to support govt forces of Iraq a US intervention will strengthen ISIS not weaken it

yep, you'd much rather have the Talibs running thing in Afghanistan again.


plenty of "blue eyed blond haired" Syrians fighting with FSA, Nusra, Qaeda and ISIS etc


My point was that all of them (bad guys) need to be wiped out, that there might be civvie casualties should be no reason to not drop those bombs like has been happening under a limp-wristed weak Obama admin, sorties returning with all the munitions still sitting nicely on the pylons because the chain of command went all the way up to Obama himself in many cases.


He has to hire from the pool of talent that's available to him. I have no problem with him appointing the likes of John Bolton et all to important positions just as long as he remains his own man and overrules or dismisses their advice should they tell him to support the rebels or enforce a no fly zone to shoot down Russian planes etc.

Sarah Palin is not getting anything significant lol


A stronger more assertive US policy in the middle east, not the insanity of Bush, not the weak duplicitous acts of Obama.

stop support for the rebels, reign in Turkey, Saudia and Qatar etc, work with Russia, no more regime change, bomb ISIS into oblivion and retake all territory they control, all this is common sense and can be done.
Obama.s policy was weak wtf he destroyed Middle East because of a hawkish policy

Nope the best policy for US would be to support govt forces of Iraq a US intervention will strengthen ISIS not weaken it

By reigning in on Saudi,Turkey,Qatar you mean?
US already damaged relations with many of its East Asian allies you will help Russia and China if you continue this policy

Electoral college voting against Trump (mid december) will have no effect long run....because Congress has to vote on the electoral college decision in early January and they can effectively veto any potential EC shenanigans if it happens en masse (past a few faithless electors that dont change the result).

EC voting against trump (and against what the people voted for in their states) will just be a stalling tactic at best if they do that....and much of the establishment will open themselves up to massive litigation and even more punitive action from Trump once he does get in.

Its a free world and Putin can continue to keep saying whatever he wants.
I dont think we should put Putin and Trump in the same bracket
He is not a xenophobe and he us also not a climate change denier
 
Obama.s policy was weak wtf he destroyed Middle East because of a hawkish policy

Nope the best policy for US would be to support govt forces of Iraq a US intervention will strengthen ISIS not weaken it
Obama is a fool. The way he handled the mess he inherited was really pathetic, he was like a doctor who instead of performing an emergency trauma surgery, pulled the plug. Should have fought harder for a SOFA and kept a residual force.

The Iraqis are already being supported by the US and are on the offensive but ISIS are in Syria too, they're headquartered there so Trump has no choice but to work with Russia, good thing he always wanted to do so, much much better idea than supporting FSA terrorists and blowing up Russian jets.

By reigning in on Saudi,Turkey,Qatar you mean?
stop them from supporting the rebels too.

look, Syria is the most complicated war ever, nothing is going to be easy but I'm looking forward to see how Trump handles it, things are going to change quite drastically from the previous two administrations, that we can be sure of. (I think)

US already damaged relations with many of its East Asian allies you will help Russia and China if you continue this policy
which east Asian allies ? Duterte already made a U turn. http://www.reuters.com/article/us-philippines-usa-rifles-idUSKBN1390DY?il=0 lol

He is not a xenophobe and he us also not a climate change denier
but he's still a homophobe !

and a sexist ! :mad:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...Putins-incredibly-sexist-Hillary-Clinton.html

lol, loving the global liberal meltdown.

moar:
:rofl:


Trump's first big interview post elections:
http://www.mediaite.com/tv/watch-donald-trump-discusses-his-election-victory-on-60-minutes/

good interview, much more measured.
 

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom