third eye
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2008
- Messages
- 18,519
- Reaction score
- 13
- Country
- Location
Each time a Pak PM goes to the US the K word is his / her opening gambit.
Nothing has changed in 65 + years. Maybe Pak should change tack..
US policy on Kashmir unchanged - DAWN.COM
WASHINGTON: The United States has refused to endorse Prime Minister Nawaz Sharifs call for internationalising the Kashmir dispute and has urged him to stay engaged with India for resolving this issue.
Previewing Mr Sharifs meeting with US President Barack Obama on Wednesday, senior administration officials acknowledged that the United States and Pakistan had, and would continue to, discuss the drone strikes in Fata but only as part of a larger security issue.
On Kashmir, our policy has not changed an iota, said one of the officials while briefing the media.
Reiterating Americas traditional position on Kashmir, the official said it was for India and Pakistan to determine the pace, scope and character of their dialogue on Kashmir.
During a stopover in London on Sunday, Mr Sharif sought US intervention in resolving the Kashmir dispute.
The official said the Obama-Sharif meeting would focus on bilateral relationship, including energy, economy and extremism, Pakistans relations with India and Afghanistan would also figure in the talks.
We would continue to support a strong sovereign Afghanistan. There will be discussion how Pakistan sees the post-2014 Afghanistan, the official said.
We will continue to show our interest in a strong sovereign Afghanistan, which is prosperous, given that we have to conclude the combat mission in Afghanistan by the end of next year.
The United States, he said, was keen to learn Pakistan viewed the recent developments in Afghanistan and what they would like it to be a post-2014 presence of Nato in Afghanistan.
Pakistans relations with India, he said, would also come up at some point. We have been very encouraged by steps that both India and Pakistan has taken.
The US administration, he said, was encouraged by the steps the two countries had taken to resolve issues on trade.
Common enemy
We anticipate that Prime Minister Sharif is likely to raise our efforts against terrorist networks. I think this will be part of what has been an ongoing strategic dialogue with Pakistan the issue of security and counter-terrorism co-operation.
We need to work together to address this difference. We continue to work closely with Pakistan to make sure that they have the support and capacity to conduct counter- terrorism operation.
It is clear that both countries have a common enemy and a common cause in the problem of violent extremists. Pakistan has suffered at the hands of terrorist. We need to have a concerted and coordinated effort to deal with this problem.
About the question of how it (militancy) is seen differently, there was obvious differences in the perspective between United States traditional concerns, historically USs concern on Al Qaeda, Kabuls concerns on the Haqqani network and the Afghan Taliban, Islamabads concerns on the Pakistani Taliban, separatists coming into Balochistan.
So across that border there is clearly different perspective, even with cross-border militant issue on that border alone, not to mention the issues with India.
So I think, the idea is to, when we say cross border militancy, that the problem exists in many directions from both sides and to approach it from that different perspective.
Funding of JuD
We want to hear from him, what his priorities are and much of this would be a dialogue.Iran pipeline: On this issue in particular our position has been quite clear for many years now the US is helping Pakistan to address its energy issues in a variety of ways.
Talks with TTP:
This is an internal matter for Pakistan. We look forward to hearing from prime minister on what their plans are, the negotiations that are occurring in what time frame, but that is part of the overall critical shared discussion that we have on countering and ending terrorism and helping Pakistan achieve a more stable and prosperous role.
Senior Obama officials said that besides focusing on countering violent extremism, the US was equally interested in Pakistans economic growth.
We remain committed to growth in the private sector this would be the core area of the relationship, economic and energy progress outside of the traditional area, he said.
The official said that the US viewed its relationship with Pakistan as a very realistic and pragmatic partnership, one that would remain focused on peoples interest.
Pakistans economic growth would be a core area of discussion between US and Pakistani teams, the official said.
The fact that the visit would focus on many areas of economic and energy progress, outside the security area of discussion is important in itself, he added.
Nothing has changed in 65 + years. Maybe Pak should change tack..
US policy on Kashmir unchanged - DAWN.COM
WASHINGTON: The United States has refused to endorse Prime Minister Nawaz Sharifs call for internationalising the Kashmir dispute and has urged him to stay engaged with India for resolving this issue.
Previewing Mr Sharifs meeting with US President Barack Obama on Wednesday, senior administration officials acknowledged that the United States and Pakistan had, and would continue to, discuss the drone strikes in Fata but only as part of a larger security issue.
On Kashmir, our policy has not changed an iota, said one of the officials while briefing the media.
Reiterating Americas traditional position on Kashmir, the official said it was for India and Pakistan to determine the pace, scope and character of their dialogue on Kashmir.
During a stopover in London on Sunday, Mr Sharif sought US intervention in resolving the Kashmir dispute.
The official said the Obama-Sharif meeting would focus on bilateral relationship, including energy, economy and extremism, Pakistans relations with India and Afghanistan would also figure in the talks.
We would continue to support a strong sovereign Afghanistan. There will be discussion how Pakistan sees the post-2014 Afghanistan, the official said.
We will continue to show our interest in a strong sovereign Afghanistan, which is prosperous, given that we have to conclude the combat mission in Afghanistan by the end of next year.
The United States, he said, was keen to learn Pakistan viewed the recent developments in Afghanistan and what they would like it to be a post-2014 presence of Nato in Afghanistan.
Pakistans relations with India, he said, would also come up at some point. We have been very encouraged by steps that both India and Pakistan has taken.
The US administration, he said, was encouraged by the steps the two countries had taken to resolve issues on trade.
Common enemy
We anticipate that Prime Minister Sharif is likely to raise our efforts against terrorist networks. I think this will be part of what has been an ongoing strategic dialogue with Pakistan the issue of security and counter-terrorism co-operation.
We need to work together to address this difference. We continue to work closely with Pakistan to make sure that they have the support and capacity to conduct counter- terrorism operation.
It is clear that both countries have a common enemy and a common cause in the problem of violent extremists. Pakistan has suffered at the hands of terrorist. We need to have a concerted and coordinated effort to deal with this problem.
About the question of how it (militancy) is seen differently, there was obvious differences in the perspective between United States traditional concerns, historically USs concern on Al Qaeda, Kabuls concerns on the Haqqani network and the Afghan Taliban, Islamabads concerns on the Pakistani Taliban, separatists coming into Balochistan.
So across that border there is clearly different perspective, even with cross-border militant issue on that border alone, not to mention the issues with India.
So I think, the idea is to, when we say cross border militancy, that the problem exists in many directions from both sides and to approach it from that different perspective.
Funding of JuD
We want to hear from him, what his priorities are and much of this would be a dialogue.Iran pipeline: On this issue in particular our position has been quite clear for many years now the US is helping Pakistan to address its energy issues in a variety of ways.
Talks with TTP:
This is an internal matter for Pakistan. We look forward to hearing from prime minister on what their plans are, the negotiations that are occurring in what time frame, but that is part of the overall critical shared discussion that we have on countering and ending terrorism and helping Pakistan achieve a more stable and prosperous role.
Senior Obama officials said that besides focusing on countering violent extremism, the US was equally interested in Pakistans economic growth.
We remain committed to growth in the private sector this would be the core area of the relationship, economic and energy progress outside of the traditional area, he said.
The official said that the US viewed its relationship with Pakistan as a very realistic and pragmatic partnership, one that would remain focused on peoples interest.
Pakistans economic growth would be a core area of discussion between US and Pakistani teams, the official said.
The fact that the visit would focus on many areas of economic and energy progress, outside the security area of discussion is important in itself, he added.
