What's new

US Planning to Snatch Pakistan's Nukes

Status
Not open for further replies.
begin.There is a reason why India is pushing FMCT to 2014

And your point is? Pakistan already leads India in terms of warheads, and with its full Khushab capacity coming online, India will never be able to catch up without a matching investment in weapons fuel production.
 
.
The only thing India is worrying about the terror and in case of war the refugees.Ask the brigadier he doesn't care much about nukes
What 'brigadier'? And what has India done in response to 'terror' so far, given India's own allegations of Pakistani 'complicity'?
 
.
And your point is? Pakistan already leads India in terms of warheads, and with its full Khushab capacity coming online, India will never be able to catch up without a matching investment in weapons fuel production.

yes sir you are 20 years ahead of us.
 
. .
Pakistan is not giving up its nuclear weapons, and with the 4 Khushab reactors coming online it certainly is not going to stop expanding its arsenal, so the West can try its best.

They are a little late though - the best time to sanction Pakistan economically and prevent a buildup of its nuclear weapons capability was back in the 90's. Now, if the West wants to sanction Pakistan and destroy it economically, they also have to contend with a massive nuclear infrastructure falling into the hands of extremist groups or leaders in the military, and in case of an attempt to 'neutralize the nuclear infrastructure, the deterrent factor mentioned already applies.

Therefore I doubt the West is going to resort to reducing Pakistan to NK status, unless Pakistan ends up with a leader like Kim Jong or Hitler.

There are many ways to make any country 'kneel', yet the were not tried at the most opportune time, right after the nuclear tests. If it hasn't happened yet with Iran, it is a long way from happening in Pakistan.

BTW, Pakistan has the agricultural and economic resources to support its population by itself, unlike North Korea.

You should update yourself with economic activity inside Pakistan. look at your external debt , 14% Inflation and your agrarian economy again depends upon the rainfall, irrigation facilities are worst. GDP rate ? Pakistan is adding 6-7 millions each year in their BPL. Don't forget all your major rivers go from India and we already making big dams on them.

You already in a state of war with a fragile economy. Iran is a different game altogether. You are falling in the line of N.Korea.
 
.
And your point is? Pakistan already leads India in terms of warheads, and with its full Khushab capacity coming online, India will never be able to catch up without a matching investment in weapons fuel production.
How many of them Work?The supposed CHIC designs are at the sub-tactical level.Nobody has seen you testing warhead fuses
 
.
You should update yourself with economic activity inside Pakistan. look at your external debt , 14% Inflation and your agrarian economy again depends upon the rainfall, irrigation facilities are worst. GDP rate ? Don't forget all your major rivers go from India and we already making big dams on them.

You already in a state of war with a fragile economy. Iran is a different game altogether. You are falling in the line of N.Korea.
That is for us to worry about, I don't see the economic situation being anywhere close to doom and gloom image you are painting.

Only time will tell how Pakistan handles the situation, if the West resorts to blanket economic sanctions.

But as I pointed out, let alone 'give up nuclear weapons', Pakistan is not even considering a halt to its weapons expansion process, given the facilities coming online at Khushab. So your arguments are too late and irrelevant at this point.
 
. .
How many of them Work?The supposed CHIC designs are at the sub-tactical level.Nobody has seen you testing warhead fuses

Dont you get what is his meaning.he said they are 20 or may be 40 years ahead of India.
 
.
How many of them Work?The supposed CHIC designs are at the sub-tactical level.Nobody has seen you testing warhead fuses
What 'CHIC Designs'? I suspect you are simply regurgitating the comments of someone else.

Please provide justification and proper explanations for your comments.

At the moment, by simply regurgitating someone elses comments without really understanding them or understanding whether they are even justified, your posts are incomprehensible.
 
. .
That is for us to worry about, I don't see the economic situation being anywhere close to doom and gloom image you are painting.

Only time will tell how Pakistan handles the situation, if the West resorts to blanket economic sanctions.

But as I pointed out, let alone 'give up nuclear weapons', Pakistan is not even considering a halt to its weapons expansion process, given the facilities coming online at Khushab. So your arguments are too late and irrelevant at this point.

My point is not late neither irrelevant-- You are answering very selectively might be suffering from the ostrich syndrome. The last line of my argument was very critical.

You are falling in the line of N.Korea.

Now do you want that ?

Now don't answer with mere rhetoric.
 
.
We have enough 'resources' for our nuclear arsenal to outnumber India's, and with the four reactors coming online at Khushab, the pace of growth in the arsenal is only going to increase manifold.

Although, this is one competition I would not like India to win, what makes you thing that India cannot catch up with Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal build up. Remember India is much bigger economy and more resourceful as compared to Pakistan
 
.
And your point is? Pakistan already leads India in terms of warheads, and with its full Khushab capacity coming online, India will never be able to catch up without a matching investment in weapons fuel production.
FMCT is a cut off treaty
 
.
Khusab is "coming" online and India has been having nearly 16 reactors producing material since last 2 decades.You are naive AM
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom