US-Pakistan Joint Statement Angers India

[graphican]

When most Indians start their reply with a LMOL smile, know they've been hit where it hurts them the most. There is no reason to start an argument with a outlander laughter unless objective is to hide pain. Just psychological fact!

A welcome move and a diplomatic victory of Pakistan's stance. Now India cannot even yubblish "atoot ang" tongue twister because court of Kashmir has rejected this babble out-rightly. Now you will find there is actually a little more reason for Indians to start their posts with this.

Now there is another natural reaction expected from Indians and that is "Dethai Reaction". You will find them using LMOL even more.. just to pretend they actually wanted to laugh instead of hiding their humiliation.

 

[xyxmt]

As usual this Haq character is putting spins and clutching at straws.

The bottom like is that Nawaz's much touted trip has been a disaster! Period!

hehehehe

 

[ito]

Well, there is nothing to be angry about the statement....I personally find the whole NS trip to be a big failure. If Pakistanis are happy, then alI I can say is good for them.

 

[Spectre]

Well, there is nothing to be angry about the statement....I personally find the whole NS trip to be a big failure. If Pakistanis are happy, then alI I can say is good for them.

It was a very successful trip ------For India. Words LeT got mentioned which Pakistan would prefer world forgot. Infact Nawaz had to cough out a promise to exterminate them.

 

[GR!FF!N]

Idiots there isnt any group calked LeT, have you ever heard of JUD.

Though you think you're smarter than rest of us,thats not the fact..

Read the sentence "LeT and Affiliated Groups"....

LeT's present face is JUD.The moment Pakistan will try a "Mock Crackdown" on them,the organisation will change its name and will become something else.But with this sentence,they bind all these groups(Past/Upcoming) together.

in fact,everybody associates JUD with Let..

UNSC 1267...

QDe.118 Name: LASHKAR-E-TAYYIBA
A.k.a.: a) Lashkar-e-Toiba b) Lashkar-i-Taiba c) al Mansoorian d) al Mansooreen e) Army of the Pure f) Army of the Righteous g) Army of the Pure and Righteous h) Paasban-e-Kashmir i) Paasban-i-Ahle-Hadith j) Pasban-e-Kashmir k) Pasban-e-Ahle-Hadith l) Paasban-e-Ahle-Hadis m) Pashan-e-ahle Hadis n) Lashkar e Tayyaba o) LET p) Jamaat-ud-Dawa q) JUD r) Jama'at al-Dawa s) Jamaat ud-Daawa t) Jamaat ul-Dawah u) Jamaat-ul-Dawa v) Jama'at-i-Dawat w) Jamaiat-ud-Dawa x) Jama'at-ud-Da'awah y) Jama'at-ud-Da'awa z) Jamaati-ud-Dawa aa) Falah-i-Insaniat Foundation (FIF) F.k.a.: na Address: na Listed on: 2 May 2005 (amended on 3 Nov. 2005, 10 Dec. 2008, 14 Mar. 2012 ) Other Information: Associated with Hafiz Muhammad Saeed (QDi.263) who is the leader of Lashkar-e-Tayyiba. Review pursuant to Security Council resolution 1822 (2008) was concluded on 8 Jun. 2010.

QDi.263 Name: 1: HAFIZ 2: MUHAMMAD 3: SAEED 4: na
Title: na Designation: na DOB: 5 Jun. 1950 POB: Sargodha, Punjab, Pakistan Good quality a.k.a.: a) Hafiz Mohammad Sahib b) Hafiz Mohammad Sayid c) Hafiz Muhammad d) Hafiz Saeed e) Hafez Mohammad Saeed f) Hafiz Mohammad Sayeed g) Tata Mohammad Syeed h) Mohammad Sayed i) Muhammad Saeed Low quality a.k.a.: Hafiz Ji Nationality: Pakistani Passport no.: na National identification no.: Pakistani 3520025509842-7 Address: House No. 116E, Mohalla Johar, Lahore, Tehsil, Lahore City, Lahore District, Pakistan ( location as at May 2008) Listed on: 10 Dec. 2008 (amended on 17 Jul. 2009 ) Other information: Muhammad Saeed is the leader of Lashkar-e-Tayyiba (QDe.118).

https://www.un.org/sc/suborg/sites/www.un.org.sc.suborg/files/1267.htm

 

[ito]

It was a very successful trip ------For India. Words LeT got mentioned which Pakistan would prefer world forgot. Infact Nawaz had to cough out a promise to exterminate them.

Yes, the body language of NS while meeting Obama was too uncomfortable. You can say NS didn't got what he wanted.

 

[Osiris]

Nawaz went to US carrying dossiers on Indian terrorism. Was instead made to pledge to clean up his own house of LeT and Haqqanis.

Clearly Americans are not fooled by these public consumptions stunts carried out Pakistan establishment. Last year Pakistan establishment decided, as a policy, they will blame India for all the terrorism in Pakistan.

And started making massive propaganda, this strategy did work well on gullible Pakistani populace, who were already looking for some one to blame for their ills and India, a already hostile nation made a convenient scape goat.

But it has had no buyers in the interactional arena.

 

[RiazHaq]

Nawaz went to US carrying dossiers on Indian terrorism. Was instead made to pledge to clean up his own house of LeT and Haqqanis.

Clearly Americans are not fooled by these public consumptions stunts carried out Pakistan establishment. Last year Pakistan establishment decided, as a policy, they will blame India for all the terrorism in Pakistan.

And started making massive propaganda, this strategy did work well on gullible Pakistani populace, who were already looking for some one to blame for their ills and India, a already hostile nation made a convenient scape goat.

But it has had no buyers in the interactional arena.

Referring to the strained India-Pakistan ties, the statement said that both leaders "emphasized the importance of a sustained and resilient dialogue process between the two neighbors aimed at resolving all outstanding territorial and other disputes, including Kashmir, through peaceful means and working together to address mutual concerns of India and Pakistan regarding terrorism".

2015 Joint Statement By President Barack Obama And Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif | whitehouse.gov

 

[Sky lord]

Meanwhile back in. Pakistan:


The visit - thenews.com.pk

Excerpt :
As expected, after what seemed to be a cordial two-hour marathon meeting between Nawaz and Obama, the joint statement focused on Pakistan’s agreement to take action against all terrorist outfits, including the Haqqani group and the Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT). The promise that the groups would not be allowed to operate from Pakistani soil suggests that the bulk of the meeting was uni-directional with the US president making demands of PM Nawaz. Combined with a vague statement proposing confidence-building measures along the Line of Control with India and President Obama raising the ‘continuing threat of nuclear terrorism’, it seems Nawaz was made to listen more than talk. There was also no nuclear deal signed – something Pakistan has hoped for a long time, arguing that the civilian use of nuclear energy could greatly help us solve our power crisis.

 

[zeetr]

Idiots there isnt any group calked LeT, have you ever heard of JUD.

indiots not indiots

 

[RiazHaq]

Meanwhile back in. Pakistan:


The visit - thenews.com.pk

Excerpt :
As expected, after what seemed to be a cordial two-hour marathon meeting between Nawaz and Obama, the joint statement focused on Pakistan’s agreement to take action against all terrorist outfits, including the Haqqani group and the Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT). The promise that the groups would not be allowed to operate from Pakistani soil suggests that the bulk of the meeting was uni-directional with the US president making demands of PM Nawaz. Combined with a vague statement proposing confidence-building measures along the Line of Control with India and President Obama raising the ‘continuing threat of nuclear terrorism’, it seems Nawaz was made to listen more than talk. There was also no nuclear deal signed – something Pakistan has hoped for a long time, arguing that the civilian use of nuclear energy could greatly help us solve our power crisis.

Meanwhile in India: US-Pakistan bonhomie leaves India at a loss

External Affairs Ministry says offer of F-16 fighter jets will affect regional stability in South Asia.

India on Friday took exception to the American appreciation for Pakistan’s anti-terror operations and the American pledge to provide eight F-16 aircraft to the Pakistan Air Force.

At a weekly press conference, External Affairs Ministry spokesperson Vikas Swarup, said: “Our reservations about providing such platforms [F-16] to Pakistan are well known and all countries are aware of India’s position in such cases.” He said supply of such strategic platforms to Pakistan could not help South Asia, especially in view of reports that Pakistan had acquired tactical and miniaturised battlefield nuclear weapons.

The joint statement issued at the end of Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif’s visit to Washington DC has been criticised in Indian policy circles as it entrusts Pakistan with maintaining “strategic stability” in South Asia. Experts have argued that the American decision-makers have misread Pakistani commitment to strategic stability in South Asia, especially since gifting the F-16 jets will further embolden Pakistan’s reckless nuclear establishment. “Pakistan is already the largest owner of nuclear weapons in South Asia. It is a known beneficiary of a clandestine nuclear programme. How can strategic stability in South Asia be maintained by gifting fighter jets to a country which has violated all norms of regional peace and stability,” asked Ajay Lele of the Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses (IDSA).

That apart, India has also expressed reservations about the support President Barack Obama has extended to securing finances for the Diamer-Bhasha and Dasu dams in Gilgit Baltistan which India believes cannot be built because of it is in an area under “illegal occupation of Pakistan.” The joint statement repeatedly referred to Pakistan’s need to deal with issues arising out of water and energy issues and both sides have also joined hands for researching on water to help Pakistan.

The joint statement was dissected critically by India which finds the Obama-Sharif call for dialogue on Kashmir an irritant. That apart, India has been surprised by the description of “terrorism as of mutual concern” between India and Pakistan.

US-Pakistan bonhomie leaves India at a loss - The Hindu

 

[raj76]

Meanwhile in India: US-Pakistan bonhomie leaves India at a loss

External Affairs Ministry says offer of F-16 fighter jets will affect regional stability in South Asia.

India on Friday took exception to the American appreciation for Pakistan’s anti-terror operations and the American pledge to provide eight F-16 aircraft to the Pakistan Air Force.

At a weekly press conference, External Affairs Ministry spokesperson Vikas Swarup, said: “Our reservations about providing such platforms [F-16] to Pakistan are well known and all countries are aware of India’s position in such cases.” He said supply of such strategic platforms to Pakistan could not help South Asia, especially in view of reports that Pakistan had acquired tactical and miniaturised battlefield nuclear weapons.

The joint statement issued at the end of Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif’s visit to Washington DC has been criticised in Indian policy circles as it entrusts Pakistan with maintaining “strategic stability” in South Asia. Experts have argued that the American decision-makers have misread Pakistani commitment to strategic stability in South Asia, especially since gifting the F-16 jets will further embolden Pakistan’s reckless nuclear establishment. “Pakistan is already the largest owner of nuclear weapons in South Asia. It is a known beneficiary of a clandestine nuclear programme. How can strategic stability in South Asia be maintained by gifting fighter jets to a country which has violated all norms of regional peace and stability,” asked Ajay Lele of the Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses (IDSA).

That apart, India has also expressed reservations about the support President Barack Obama has extended to securing finances for the Diamer-Bhasha and Dasu dams in Gilgit Baltistan which India believes cannot be built because of it is in an area under “illegal occupation of Pakistan.” The joint statement repeatedly referred to Pakistan’s need to deal with issues arising out of water and energy issues and both sides have also joined hands for researching on water to help Pakistan.

The joint statement was dissected critically by India which finds the Obama-Sharif call for dialogue on Kashmir an irritant. That apart, India has been surprised by the description of “terrorism as of mutual concern” between India and Pakistan.

US-Pakistan bonhomie leaves India at a loss - The Hindu

lol its necessary to show resentment on things which actually dont bother u just to keep the pressure rest u look smart enough to judge or see what 8 jets can make a difference

 

[ito]

Referring to the strained India-Pakistan ties, the statement said that both leaders "emphasized the importance of a sustained and resilient dialogue process between the two neighbors aimed at resolving all outstanding territorial and other disputes, including Kashmir, through peaceful means and working together to address mutual concerns of India and Pakistan regarding terrorism".

2015 Joint Statement By President Barack Obama And Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif | whitehouse.gov

Meanwhile in India: US-Pakistan bonhomie leaves India at a loss

External Affairs Ministry says offer of F-16 fighter jets will affect regional stability in South Asia.

India on Friday took exception to the American appreciation for Pakistan’s anti-terror operations and the American pledge to provide eight F-16 aircraft to the Pakistan Air Force.

At a weekly press conference, External Affairs Ministry spokesperson Vikas Swarup, said: “Our reservations about providing such platforms [F-16] to Pakistan are well known and all countries are aware of India’s position in such cases.” He said supply of such strategic platforms to Pakistan could not help South Asia, especially in view of reports that Pakistan had acquired tactical and miniaturised battlefield nuclear weapons.

The joint statement issued at the end of Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif’s visit to Washington DC has been criticised in Indian policy circles as it entrusts Pakistan with maintaining “strategic stability” in South Asia. Experts have argued that the American decision-makers have misread Pakistani commitment to strategic stability in South Asia, especially since gifting the F-16 jets will further embolden Pakistan’s reckless nuclear establishment. “Pakistan is already the largest owner of nuclear weapons in South Asia. It is a known beneficiary of a clandestine nuclear programme. How can strategic stability in South Asia be maintained by gifting fighter jets to a country which has violated all norms of regional peace and stability,” asked Ajay Lele of the Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses (IDSA).

That apart, India has also expressed reservations about the support President Barack Obama has extended to securing finances for the Diamer-Bhasha and Dasu dams in Gilgit Baltistan which India believes cannot be built because of it is in an area under “illegal occupation of Pakistan.” The joint statement repeatedly referred to Pakistan’s need to deal with issues arising out of water and energy issues and both sides have also joined hands for researching on water to help Pakistan.

The joint statement was dissected critically by India which finds the Obama-Sharif call for dialogue on Kashmir an irritant. That apart, India has been surprised by the description of “terrorism as of mutual concern” between India and Pakistan.

US-Pakistan bonhomie leaves India at a loss - The Hindu

There is nothing in the statement that hurts India's interest except may be US plans to invest in P0K and GB. 8 F16 will not have much effect on India's security given that India spends 6 times more on defense than Pakistan.

 

[Storm Force]

WELL DONE PAKISTAN $900 million in aid

You blow it on 8 F16s

And your secret service continues to support some terror groups which you can use in a PROXY WAR against.

GULLIBLE AMERICANS or more LIKE USA don't give a dam about WHAT INDIA THINKS as long as USA interests are met
#
Pakistan keeps on milking the USA cash cow

 

[mingle]

Haq sb there is nothing new in this statement it's more like copy and paste thing these things been same in mush Zaradari and now Mian Nerender tour actualy there is nothing between us and pak except CT and Afghanistan .in Gen Mush era us investment in pak was 1.2 billion which now only 170 million .Sir G nobody will invest in pak unless leadership of pak invest in pak when ur money invest in Dubai ,London & India and jedha who fool will invest in ur country and u talking about Americans Allah Allah .
The guy they gonna deal wit his Gen Raheel he is going Next month that where all issues will be sorted out this trip by Mian Narender was more like family picnic on govt expenses

WELL DONE PAKISTAN $900 million in aid

You blow it on 8 F16s

And your secret service continues to support some terror groups which you can use in a PROXY WAR against.

GULLIBLE AMERICANS or more LIKE USA don't give a dam about WHAT INDIA THINKS as long as USA interests are met
#
Pakistan keeps on milking the USA cash cow

It's not aid it's called CSF it's pak money which us owes them .

There is nothing in the statement that hurts India's interest except may be US plans to invest in P0K and GB. 8 F16 will not have much effect on India's security given that India spends 6 times more on defense than Pakistan.

Lala G 8 r F 16s V so its initial order keep watching more gonna roll out down the road cold water on ur French jets which still on paper .