US needs Japan and EU to compete against China on Quantum Computing

[Han Patriot]

Well, the definition of ignorant is lacking knowledge or awareness in general; uneducated or unsophisticated.

So seems to be, unless you know something I don't, you are probably talking about yourself.

No worries bhai, all is good. We are a plastic toy maker onleee.

 

[8888888888888]

Wonder if China can get Russia involved in this? It’s more like sticking it to USA.

 

[hirobo2]

Japanese aren't that smart. That's y they lost WWII. And American engineers aren't that great either. This technological partnering looks like a lost cause to me...

 

[KungFuLee]

No worries bhai, all is good. We are a plastic toy maker onleee.

I like how you people have this duplexity

If all is good, then you would not bother to say MIT report was wrong and China is also making those cable. And if all is good, you and me won't be going on and on about 5 posts on the issue.

I mean, If you think this is that important to do what I said above, then you really should put up or shut up, what is the point to talk about this and then saying "I don't care about them but I tell you they are wrong"? So, which one is it? Is it "all is good" so you shouldn't be talk about it in the first place? Or all is not good and you need to spend all this time talking about how you don't "bother" to proof the MIT review is wrong? You know you can't have both.

As you said, ignorant is a bliss, right?

 

[Han Patriot]

I like how you people have this duplexity

If all is good, then you would not bother to say MIT report was wrong and China is also making those cable. And if all is good, you and me won't be going on and on about 5 posts on the issue.

I mean, If you think this is that important to do what I said above, then you really should put up or shut up, what is the point to talk about this and then saying "I don't care about them but I tell you they are wrong"? So, which one is it? Is it "all is good" so you shouldn't be talk about it in the first place? Or all is not good and you need to spend all this time talking about how you don't "bother" to proof the MIT review is wrong? You know you can't have both.

As you said, ignorant is a bliss, right?

Ahh the typical yindoo rant, i said all is good for US. We onleeee make pastic toys... Got it boy genius?

 

[KungFuLee]

Ahh the typical yindoo rant, i said all is good for US. We onleeee make pastic toys... Got it boy genius?

Again, are you talking about yourself? Why you did not let this go when you "say" you do not care? Or you get some kind of weird disease that your brain and hand have separated motor function and you cannot control yourself? Do you want me to put a stop to this?

And you are obsessed with this yindoo stuff, maybe you yourself are one? I mean the only people who care about if anyone are gay are usually themselves are gay.

 

[FairAndUnbiased]

As I said, I am not a cable person nor an engineer, I am an accountant by trade and a Law Grad. How would I know what's what? I saw a report some time ago from a world renown institute. I quote you that report.

again, if you have any proof that point to otherwise, please let MIT know, I am not going to comment on conjecture and guess or "let me tell you"

by the way, the article did not say thermal, it said it does not conduct that much heat, not that it is thermal. And photonic cable do not actually conduct much heat, and one of the application is heat detection.

the word photonic was not mentioned in the article. where did you get photonic from?

 

[KungFuLee]

the word photonic was not mentioned in the article. where did you get photonic from?

One word. RESEARCH

You don't need to be an expert in the field to do research. google is your friend. If you would do some homework yourself, you will know even which company the MIT review talked about.

but if you are not going to get off your lazy bone, then sorry, can't help you

 

[Viet]

Japanese aren't that smart. That's y they lost WWII. And American engineers aren't that great either. This technological partnering looks like a lost cause to me...

Are you sure? Is China really ahead of others? The people of google seem smart to me. Not stupid.
From what I read they are the ones that firstly developed a quantum chip - called sycamore. It is said the 53 qubits chip is able to solve a complex mathematical function in random numbers within minutes while supercomputer need 10,000 years. That’s great I believe.

Wow it takes 3 countries to match one Chinky country? What era am I living in? A decade ago, we were just exporting cheap plastic toys. Hmmm

Wow it takes 3 countries to match one Chinky country? What era am I living in? A decade ago, we were just exporting cheap plastic toys. Hmmm

It’s very common that nations put their resources together to solve a problem. China has 1.4 billion people you don’t need other I can understand.

 

[FairAndUnbiased]

One word. RESEARCH

You don't need to be an expert in the field to do research. google is your friend. If you would do some homework yourself, you will know even which company the MIT review talked about.

but if you are not going to get off your lazy bone, then sorry, can't help you

but you just said you are an accountant and lawyer, not qualified to comment on the accuracy of MIT's report. how can you understand the research?

 

[KungFuLee]

but you just said you are an accountant and lawyer, not qualified to comment on the accuracy of MIT's report. how can you understand the research?

So just because I am a trained in law and accountant, does that mean I don't have a brain and cannot read and cannot go online and search what the hell is that MIT report is about?

As a law graduate, I don't take information as is. I don't just take somebody word and quote it, I need to somehow verify the information before I make a quote. Just because I am not an expert on the field does not mean I cannot check the legitimacy of a claim, in fact, that is what Lawyer do in court, lawyer cannot be its own expert witness. If an witness told you a story on something you are not an expert with, do you just take the face value of that witness and not research on what he said before use it in court? If you didn't do that, that is not a testimony, that's a hearsay.

Again, if you bother to search, you will know which company that report is talking about, but if you are even too lazy to do that, I can't help you.

 

[FairAndUnbiased]

So just because I am a trained in law and accountant, does that mean I don't have a brain and cannot read and cannot go online and search what the hell is that MIT report is about?

As a law graduate, I don't take information as is. I don't just take somebody word and quote it, I need to somehow verify the information before I make a quote. Just because I am not an expert on the field does not mean I cannot check the legitimacy of a claim, in fact, that is what Lawyer do in court, lawyer cannot be its own expert witness. If an witness told you a story on something you are not an expert with, do you just take the face value of that witness and not research on what he said before use it in court? If you didn't do that, that is not a testimony, that's a hearsay.

Again, if you bother to search, you will know which company that report is talking about, but if you are even too lazy to do that, I can't help you.

you made the claim. I have no obligation to source your claims for you.

so I ask again, who said anything about photonic cables? did the article mention the word photonic at all?

 

[Globenim]

China works with Europe on Quantum Computing.
US and Japan wants to work with the "EU".
Waiting for US fabicated drama holding everyone back.

 

[seven7seven]

US, Japan and Europe ganging up to take on China is nothing new. It's how these vultures work. All Chinese should never forget that this is what they did when they pillaged and robbed China when China was in turmoil and weak. China should never forget that US, Japan and EU are never China's Friend and never to be trusted. However, these cockroaches are now trying to take on a China that is no longer weak and powerless. China needs to build national strength to crush all China's enemies.

 

[KungFuLee]

you made the claim. I have no obligation to source your claims for you.

so I ask again, who said anything about photonic cables? did the article mention the word photonic at all?

First of all, I did not make that claim. MIT did with its report on January 2019, as with the previous person, if you think or have evidence that point toward what the MIT report is wrong, then please feel free to contact MIT so they would either update or retract that report.

Second of all, if you want to challenge their claim, then by the court of law, you are the liable party of the burden of proof. Now, as a former law student which is one exam away from being a lawyer, I can tell you this, in a civil claim court(Yes, this would be a civil claim), if you have any allegation on the other party, say in a libel case, it is not up to the accused to proof their innocents, it's up to the accuse to submit evidence. You cannot sue me for libel and ask me to provide proof that what I said did exist. On the other hand, you need to show what I said did not exist through something we called affidavit. Without that, you cannot challenge the claim. You will not have a standing in court.

Now, as I say one last time, read the report, do your research, it's up to you. If you want to challenge the MIT review, feel free to contact them. But out here asking for proof to discredit people review. That is not how academic do stuff. You have sufficient evidence? Shove it down MIT mouth and I think if you are lucky, they may even offer you an apology.