US NAVAL BASE ,On BD !! True Or Lie ??

[idune]

Seikh Hasina factor but not a factor , enough is enough.She has done a lots of , tons of damaradge to the nation.So,
From Now on it's high time to uproot her party from bd and bring anti awami power to Bd means Bring BNP in power,tie up with the Islamic nations ,China like b4.


Coz Everyone Not Fools Like Zabaniya.We Understnd What's Happening,Why Happening.
Sorry Mr.Zab U can think it a useless news but I dont think America Ever did any work without thinking.So,sorry to say
but yes, this is obviously is a very thinkable matter.

Please dont talk and think like naive and paranoid. There are much deeper cause and justification of these indian ploy. You better understand who is pulling what staring and who is dancing to these tune. Simply bringing BNP in the power is not the answer unless BNP pursue national and nationalistic interest. Also, dont judge all US involvement with same lense. Context, environment, geo politics, specific needs and local and international undercurrents are at play. Sharpen your understanding before making flatboard comments.

 

[Syed Naved]

Sir this is evil America and Indian trick. They look like India against it so Bangladeshi public support it but India not against the naval base.

Absolutuly right n perfect say my chinese friend its nothing but an evil indo-american trick.but question is , how ppl protest it
coz both of them is same kind of evil , hope that china bcome a super power and throwout thise evil america.

 

[Md Akmal]

Absolutuly right n perfect say my chinese friend its nothing but an evil indo-american trick.but question is , how ppl protest it
coz both of them is same kind of evil , hope that china bcome a super power and throwout thise evil america.

@ As per my experiences the economic condition of USA is miserable. Soon they would withdraw from Afganistan. They are already in the process of withdrawal from Iraq.

@ On the other hand slowly and gradually China is coming up economically. For a reasonable time I was in China. Chinese military technology is no match with USA. It woud take decades to match with American technology and it might happen that they cannot catch up with USA.

@ China is a big country, but I tell you they even never dear to attack Taiwan !!!!! No Western country is going to help China in regards to Defence/Military technology. Chinese military technology is still in crude type. Still they donnot have Aircraft Carrier.

@ But yet I would prefer to be with the Chinese for our existance. It was China which had build our army. It is China which had built our bridges and what not ????????

 

[UKBengali]

@ As per my experiences the economic condition of USA is miserable. Soon they would withdraw from Afganistan. They are already in the process of withdrawal from Iraq.

@ On the other hand slowly and gradually China is coming up economically. For a reasonable time I was in China. Chinese military technology is no match with USA. It woud take decades to match with American technology and it might happen that they cannot catch up with USA.

@ China is a big country, but I tell you they even never dear to attack Taiwan !!!!! No Western country is going to help China in regards to Defence/Military technology. Chinese military technology is still in crude type. Still they donnot have Aircraft Carrier.

@ But yet I would prefer to be with the Chinese for our existance. It China which had build our army. It is China which had built our bridges and what not ????????

Chinese military technology nowhere near US?

Type-052C destroyer, KJ-2000 AWACs, HQ-9C SAM, Type-99 Tank and DF-31A/DF-41 ICBM?!s

You are seriously overestimating US technological superiority.

What advantage that the US has will be virtually wiped out when the likes of J-20 fighter, Type-052D destroyer and Type-095 SSNs are out before the end of tis decade.

 

[GR!FF!N]

Chinese military technology nowhere near US?

Type-052C destroyer, KJ-2000 AWACs, HQ-9C SAM, Type-99 Tank and DF-31A/DF-41 ICBM?!s

You are seriously overestimating US technological superiority.

What advantage that the US has will be virtually wiped out when the likes of J-20 fighter, Type-052D destroyer and Type-095 SSNs are out before the end of tis decade.

you may believe chinese propaganda,but even some chinese(not delusional or brainwashed) thinks most of China's tech is nowhere near USA..i can give you proper description and in every aspect,it'll show that Chinese weapons system is inferior than USA.and it is obvious as most of these techs china just started building when USA is using these for decades.eg.stealth aircraft,ACC..nobody can make a better system within years.it takes a lot of trial and error to make a system.

 

[Cheetah786]

source is desperate times of India LOL

 

[UKBengali]

you may believe chinese propaganda,but even some chinese(not delusional or brainwashed) thinks most of China's tech is nowhere near USA..i can give you proper description and in every aspect,it'll show that Chinese weapons system is inferior than USA.and it is obvious as most of these techs china just started building when USA is using these for decades.eg.stealth aircraft,ACC..nobody can make a better system within years.it takes a lot of trial and error to make a system.

Where is your "proof"?

 

[GR!FF!N]

Where is your "proof"?

lol..what kind of proof you want???

you want comparison between Type-052C destroyer vs aegis?? KJ-2000 AWACs vs Phalcon/E3?? HQ-9C SAM vs patriot?? Type-99 Tank vs Abrams M1A2?? DF-31A/DF-41 ICBM vs Peacekeeper???or any usa super carrier vs China's Shi Lang( )???

most of China's weapon's specs are sketchy(because they are either new or related info is not available because of hush hush development process or unreliable infos) where USA's weapon was serving war fronts and various countries for decades around the world.

 

[TopCat]

lol..what kind of proof you want???

you want comparison between Type-052C destroyer vs aegis?? KJ-2000 AWACs vs Phalcon/E3?? HQ-9C SAM vs patriot?? Type-99 Tank vs Abrams M1A2?? DF-31A/DF-41 ICBM vs Peacekeeper???or any usa super carrier vs China's Shi Lang( )???

most of China's weapon's specs are sketchy(because they are either new or related info is not available because of hush hush development process or unreliable infos) where USA's weapon was serving war fronts and various countries for decades around the world.

Chinese still no match for USA but the problem started when Russia started tagging with China. USA is no match against Russia + China.

 

[GR!FF!N]

Chinese still no match for USA but the problem started when Russia started tagging with China. USA is no match against Russia + China.

hell no..Russia isn't building any weapons platform with China..both are developing independent platforms.but if you are suggesting about political power,then still you have to consider USA+Nato powers.Russia +China is inferior to them.but in future,they may be will alternative solution of USA.

 

[Md Akmal]

lol..what kind of proof you want???

you want comparison between Type-052C destroyer vs aegis?? KJ-2000 AWACs vs Phalcon/E3?? HQ-9C SAM vs patriot?? Type-99 Tank vs Abrams M1A2?? DF-31A/DF-41 ICBM vs Peacekeeper???or any usa super carrier vs China's Shi Lang( )???

most of China's weapon's specs are sketchy(because they are either new or related info is not available because of hush hush development process or unreliable infos) where USA's weapon was serving war fronts and various countries for decades around the world.

@ Even now if war breaks out between China and India, I have lot of doubts about Chinese weapons specially on aircrafts and accuracy of Missiles ????? In 1962 India was a very weak country in respect of military soon they had acquired a good armament to defend themselves.

@ Why can't you believe that China was a isolated country for many years and still it is isolated. Whatever technology they acquired once they had a short time cordial relations with USSR and that's all. With that technology they are just copying and pesting here and there. Not a single Western Block country had helped China in this aspects.

 

[UKBengali]

lol..what kind of proof you want???

you want comparison between Type-052C destroyer vs aegis?? KJ-2000 AWACs vs Phalcon/E3?? HQ-9C SAM vs patriot?? Type-99 Tank vs Abrams M1A2?? DF-31A/DF-41 ICBM vs Peacekeeper???or any usa super carrier vs China's Shi Lang( )???

most of China's weapon's specs are sketchy(because they are either new or related info is not available because of hush hush development process or unreliable infos) where USA's weapon was serving war fronts and various countries for decades around the world.

So it is just your opinion then?

Learn to start an argument and I may decide to spend my time on you.

 

[Syed Naved]

Please dont talk and think like naive and paranoid. There are much deeper cause and justification of these indian ploy. You better understand who is pulling what staring and who is dancing to these tune. Simply bringing BNP in the power is not the answer unless BNP pursue national and nationalistic interest. Also, dont judge all US involvement with same lense. Context, environment, geo politics, specific needs and local and international undercurrents are at play. Sharpen your understanding before making flatboard comments.

I Know What I'm Saying & What Not. May Be You Are Far Away What I About BNP , I Would Like To Say, No Matter How You Like It Or Not But Things That This Govt Doing Bnp Never.
Can You Show Us A Single MP , Minister Of BNP Who Has Said, " Who Told Hilari To Come.......All Rubish " . Do They Ever Humilate America Or Did Such Work Which Insist America To Come Near Bd So Early.
In Normal sense , America doing it to controll china but on other sense this is not the complete truth.Geo politicaly bd important , Indian sub continent means the entire bd-pk-india-burma is very important so if any of them did any kind of mistakes or go
against america or a political party who is very much grateful to america for the help in coming power to rule the nation ..... did any mistake or go against america , say anything against them , do you think america wont do anything !! so better sharpen your intelligency before saying against any comment

@ As per my experiences the economic condition of USA is miserable. Soon they would withdraw from Afganistan. They are already in the process of withdrawal from Iraq.

@ On the other hand slowly and gradually China is coming up economically. For a reasonable time I was in China. Chinese military technology is no match with USA. It woud take decades to match with American technology and it might happen that they cannot catch up with USA.

@ China is a big country, but I tell you they even never dear to attack Taiwan !!!!! No Western country is going to help China in regards to Defence/Military technology. Chinese military technology is still in crude type. Still they donnot have Aircraft Carrier.

@ But yet I would prefer to be with the Chinese for our existance. It China which had build our army. It is China which had built our bridges and what not ????????

China is a real friend of us, so prefering china for our existance is the absolutely correct decission.

source is desperate times of India LOL

Not just times of India,In Other International media it was also broadcasted.specialy when panetta ensures the news.

 

[TopCat]

hell no..Russia isn't building any weapons platform with China..both are developing independent platforms.but if you are suggesting about political power,then still you have to consider USA+Nato powers.Russia +China is inferior to them.but in future,they may be will alternative solution of USA.

NATO??? Huh, Nato is zero without USA.

 

[kalu_miah]

I Know What I'm Saying & What Not. May Be You Are Far Away What I About BNP , I Would Like To Say, No Matter How You Like It Or Not But Things That This Govt Doing Bnp Never.
Can You Show Us A Single MP , Minister Of BNP Who Has Said, " Who Told Hilari To Come.......All Rubish " . Do They Ever Humilate America Or Did Such Work Which Insist America To Come Near Bd So Early.
In Normal sense , America doing it to controll china but on other sense this is not the complete truth.Geo politicaly bd important , Indian sub continent means the entire bd-pk-india-burma is very important so if any of them did any kind of mistakes or go
against america or a political party who is very much grateful to america for the help in coming power to rule the nation ..... did any mistake or go against america , say anything against them , do you think america wont do anything !! so better sharpen your intelligency before saying against any comment

China is a real friend of us, so prefering china for our existance is the absolutely correct decission.


Not just times of India,In Other International media it was also broadcasted.specialy when panetta ensures the news.

I could not understand your argument. Please clarify in short easy to understand sentences.

I do not know internal situation of Bangladesh and its political parties well. I would trust idune Bhai and Munshi Bhai's opinion on this. China at this moment is no replacement for the US to help us establish a good relation with Myanmar and ASEAN countries.

Pakistan and Bangladesh have very different geopolitical situations due to difference in geography. For ASEAN, USA is much more important, even more so than China, so we need to go with a US supported ASEAN, it is quite simple if you think about it.

For Pakistan, SCO and China is more important, once US leaves Afghanistan. It will be better for USA/NATO to hand over Afghanistan to SCO as in my opinion USA/NATO have no business in that region in the first place, it would have been better for USA to allow Soviets to take over Afghanistan at the time and not use Pakistan and Saudi extremists to oust Soviets from there, which has created this "terrorism" nonsense. On the other hand Russia and China should give up Assad and let USA/NATO/Turkey/GCC handle Syria and Assad.

You have to look at regional situation and developing multi-lateral institutions to understand which power has relevance where. For ASEAN, USA will remain relevant for decades to come and China will have negligible role except for trade and economics, in my opinion.

China may become important for ASEAN, only when it can have a bigger economy and more powerful military than all Western nations combined (USA/Canada/EU/ANZ), which we may not see in 30-50 years or more. Right this moment Chinese GDP is 7.3 trillion whereas Western nations combined GDP is about 36 trillion, you can see the difference right there.