What's new

US, Nato, India ‘encircling’ Pakistan

Spring Onion

PDF VETERAN
Joined
Feb 1, 2006
Messages
41,403
Reaction score
19
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
US, Nato, India ‘encircling’ Pakistan



By Ashraf Mumtaz

LAHORE, Sept 29: A former army chief says Pakistan is being ‘encircled’ by the United State, India, Nato and the European Union under a well thought-out plan, and calls upon the Islamic Republic to review its defence and foreign policies to deal with the challenges ahead.

Gen Mirza Aslam Beg said agreements signed by France and the United States for cooperation with India in the field of nuclear technology had serious implications for Pakistan after which it should work out its options.

“We have to maintain a respectable distance from the United States and achieve greater understanding and cooperation with China, Russia, Iran and other friendly countries of the region to strengthen our national security which is being threatened by the encirclement policy being followed by the US, India, Nato and the European Union,” he said while talking to Dawn on Monday.

He was approached for comments on the implications of cooperation between France and India after a similar agreement between New Delhi and Washington which has just been ratified by the US Congress.

Elaborating his views on reorientation of defence policy, the former army chief said: “It means we have to take into account the Islamic resistance force which is shaping the new world order.”

He said the American designs for global primacy and preeminence had been defeated by the Islamic resistance force, establishing new parameters of global peace and harmony. “Luckily, the centre of gravity of the Islamic resistance is located on our borders with Afghanistan and, therefore, not difficult to integrate it with our defence policy


He said the agreement between Paris and New Delhi in the field of nuclear technology was part of an arrangement made with India some four years ago. India and the US, he said, signed an agreement for strategic partnership after which the US declared Afghanistan part of South Asia. After the agreement, he said, India was able to establish a very strong intelligence network in Afghanistan “which works against all countries in its neighbourhood. “This network is supported by CIA, Mossad, the German intelligence MI6, and French intelligence.”

Gen Beg said the impact of the network was being felt by all neighbouring countries in general and Pakistan in particular as the latter was under focus all the time.

He said only last week India and Afghanistan had signed a defence pact according to which India would be deploying some 150,000 troops in Afghanistan by the end of next year.


The former army chief said under the US-India agreement for cooperation in nuclear technology, all 45 countries which are members of the nuclear suppliers group can transfer or engage in transfer of nuclear technology to India. The pact between Paris and New Delhi was in line with that agreement, he said.

“The involvement of the European Union in Afghanistan where the Nato forces are stationed, including French forces, have a very intimate working relationship with India and their designs may be well imagined.”He said

when the strategic agreement was signed between the US and India, and France was also involved in it through Nato, the two declared objectives were very sinister. The first was to contain and curb the rising economic and military power of China, and the second, to contain and curb the rising Islamic extremism in this area.

About the France-India collaboration, Gen Beg said it gave added advantage to India to build at least 40-50 nuclear warheads every year and get access to nuclear technology that had applications in many other areas.

Gen Beg said so far as weapons were concerned, Pakistan would not be at a disadvantage because its policy of nuclear restrain was governed by the logic of minimum credible deterrence.


US, Nato, India ‘encircling’ Pakistan -DAWN - National; September 30, 2008
 
. . .
Personally, I differ with the subject of the article reproduced.

Assuming for a moment that this is correct, the larger Q is " why is Pakistan allowing itself to get 'encircled'?

What did it do wrong ? Till not very long ago things were hunky dory. Suddenly they appear to have gone wrong.

What can it do to rectify both internally & outside.

These I feel are worth discussing.
 
.
Another inferiority complex minded article!!

Oh please spare us from inferior comments just come up with countering comments if you have at all.

Its a reality, and BTW Indians do not have guts, they never had to carry out sabotage in Pakistan without the help of other international intellegence agencies hence we its such an insult for us to feel inferior in this case.
 
. .
Personally, I differ with the subject of the article reproduced.

Assuming for a moment that this is correct, the larger Q is " why is Pakistan allowing itself to get 'encircled'?

What did it do wrong ? Till not very long ago things were hunky dory. Suddenly they appear to have gone wrong.

What can it do to rectify both internally & outside.

These I feel are worth discussing.

Does China allow herself to be encricled by US-India???
Nobody does sir you know it as well.

Unfortuantly Pakistan (the areas icluded in it) has been a buffer zone since centuries and hence we have to bear the burnt of international proxy wars by big powers.


The things were always wrong it was only that US was preparing grounds since long for encircling Pakistan.

Once it has been done it will be easy to go after

Iran, China, and Russia at last.
 
. . .
Oh please spare us from inferior comments just come up with countering comments if you have at all.

Its a reality, and BTW Indians do not have guts, they never had to carry out sabotage in Pakistan without the help of other international intellegence agencies hence we its such an insult for us to feel inferior in this case.

deer kha pukhtanay takra sha:lol::tup:
 
.
Does China allow herself to be encricled by US-India???
Nobody does sir you know it as well.

Unfortuantly Pakistan (the areas icluded in it) has been a buffer zone since centuries and hence we have to bear the burnt of international proxy wars by big powers.

The things were always wrong it was only that US was preparing grounds since long for encircling Pakistan.

Once it has been done it will be easy to go after

Iran, China, and Russia at last.

Encircling is done thru physical contact either thru a common border or with that of an ally. US has / had contained China thru S Korea, Japan, Taiwan towards the sea ward side.

More than just being a buffer, could it be that Pak ( starting Zia's time) got the taste of playing one against the other in Afghanistan & collecting the commission in form of Mil aid & the $ that came alongwith it when Zia rejected the " peanuts" Jimmy Carter offered.

Thereafter, when US pressed the right buttons, Mush did the now famous U turn and the gents he let down as we can now see have not taken kindly to his change of mind & direction.

Religion may permit taking more than one wife, but flirting with more than one mistress is much more than dangerous.
 
.
Encircling is done thru physical contact either thru a common border or with that of an ally. US has / had contained China thru S Korea, Japan, Taiwan towards the sea ward side.

:) And China had any option ???
US/India/NATO are doing same with Pakistan.

More than just being a buffer, could it be that Pak ( starting Zia's time) got the taste of playing one against the other in Afghanistan & collecting the commission in form of Mil aid & the $ that came alongwith it when Zia rejected the " peanuts" Jimmy Carter offered.

:) Well sir i first of all do not agree with this notion at all that Pakistan did that for only for money. I am writing a book on the Afghan policy of Pakistan so i am not much into explaining or posting few facts that why it was started in the first place.

But be sure sir dollars were not the main attraction rather it was bonus we got :)


Thereafter, when US pressed the right buttons, Mush did the now famous U turn and the gents he let down as we can now see have not taken kindly to his change of mind & direction.

Religion may permit taking more than one wife, but flirting with more than one mistress is much more than dangerous.


No my dear it was not and it is not US that press the right button rather it was Musharraf and Pakistan that press the right button after which we see a complete U-Turn on part of US/CIA.

When they bullied us into the alliance in 2001, US/CIA started dreaming of disarming Pakistan, snatching our nukes which indeed Musharraf did not.

And now we can see only during last 2 years of Musharraf rule that US/CIA started having cramps.
 
. .
I think time has come to have good working relation between India and Pakistan. Western powers are exploiting the situation because of differences.
 
.
I think time has come to have good working relation between India and Pakistan. Western powers are exploiting the situation because of differences.

Really! I guess we didnt realize:disagree:
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom