What's new

US-IND Defeated..53 Countries back China over Hong Kong and the National Security law.

What the USA and its 5 eyes Anglo-Saxon alliance are mourning about is their lost of their spy agencies abilities to operate freely in Hong Kong with the loophole finally closed.

It is checkmate and game over.

As for India.
India has always allowed themselves to be used by its former colonialist master and now USA in order to gain small favour.

They expects USA to support them for UNSC permanent membership without clear understanding on how it was so in the first place.
India took for granted Russia will support them. :coffee:

I for one understand their nature quite well.
I used to be a denizen of India and China.

But Modi has never expected Trump to be so ungrateful in restricting and tightening the H1B visas means more Indians will be returning home. :undecided:

Earlier on India has sabotage the RCEP signing ceremony by refusing to sign and forwarding new conditions at the 11th hour.

Did those Himalaya border incidences with China just pop out of the blue or were they in fact hatched in Washington at the behest of TRUMP USA?

How did USA knew of Doklam intrusion months ahead of the incident? Doklam is not even an Indian territory in dispute.

What was the covert deal?
In exchange of US support of India complete annexation of Kashmir and Jammu?
India has cut off all communication in both Kashmir and Jammu. Is that democratic Since Indians talk so much about DEMOCRACY and FREEDOM.

You really think China intelligence agency did not know about all of these and why the Galwan Valley incidence happened?:coffee:
 
.
I laughed as I read each country. In other words, the afterthoughts of the world.

You laugh because you realize the situation is not like what you expect, right :D

Look at all those 53 Developing countries, DARE TO SAY NO to US of A, and supporting China in front of World Assembly :enjoy:

Imagine if this happen in 90s or early 2000s. Those Developing countries definetly would BOW to US of A demand, and leave China isolated.

But now those 53 Developing Countries, they seeing China as Alternative Power that can Protect and Support them, even if Daddy USA will retaliate against their stand to Support China and SAY NO to daddy USA in World Assembly.

That's mean China hardwork to make them seeing China as Alternative Power against USA is succeeding

How did US and India get defeated when neither participated in the vote?

  • Supporting: China, Antigua and Barbuda, Bahrain, Belarus, Burundi, Cambodia, Cameroon, Central African Republic, Comoros, Congo-Brazzaville, Cuba, Djibouti, Dominica, Egypt, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Gabon, Gambia, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Laos, Lebanon, Lesotho, Mauritania, Morocco, Mozambique, Myanmar, Nepal, Nicaragua, Niger, North Korea, Oman, Pakistan, Palestine, Papua New Guinea, Saudi Arabia, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Suriname, Syria, Tajikistan, Togo, UAE, Venezuela, Yemen, Zambia and Zimbabwe.
  • Opposing: Australia, Austria, Belgium, Belize, Canada, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Iceland, Ireland, Germany, Japan, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Marshall Islands, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Palau, Slovakia, Slovenia, Sweden, Switzerland, and the U.K.
https://www.axios.com/countries-sup...law-0ec9bc6c-3aeb-4af0-8031-aa0f01a46a7c.html

That's mean your government right now is loving China so much :enjoy: They don't want to make China angry, that's why they choose Abstain :D

Good job, indian
 
Last edited:
.
You laugh because you realize the situation is not like what you expect, right :D

Look at all those 53 Developing countries, DARE TO SAY NO to US of A, and supporting China in front of World Assembly :enjoy:

Imagine if this happen in 90s or early 2000s. Those Developing countries definetly would BOW to US of A demand, and leave China isolated.

But now those 53 Developing Countries, they seeing China as Alternative Power that can Protect and Support them, even if Daddy USA will retaliate against their stand to Support China and SAY NO to daddy USA in World Assembly.

That's mean China hardwork to make them seeing China as Alternative Power against USA is succeeding



That's mean your government right now is loving China so much :enjoy: They don't want to make China angry, that's why they choose Abstain :D

Good job, indian

This guy is super delusional. What alternative power you get from Somalia.
 
.
This guy is super delusional. What alternative power you get from Somalia.

You are too narrow minded :D

Look at the full list, The whole African continent firmly Supporting China and say NO to daddy USA :enjoy:

Even your india afraid to insult China, and choose abstain instead LOL
 
Last edited:
.
https://www.axios.com/countries-sup...law-0ec9bc6c-3aeb-4af0-8031-aa0f01a46a7c.html

China, Antigua and Barbuda, Bahrain, Belarus, Burundi, Cambodia, Cameroon, Central African Republic, Comoros, Congo-Brazzaville, Cuba, Djibouti, Dominica, Egypt, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Gabon, Gambia, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Laos, Lebanon, Lesotho, Mauritania, Morocco, Mozambique, Myanmar, Nepal, Nicaragua, Niger, North Korea, Oman, Pakistan, Palestine, Papua New Guinea, Saudi Arabia, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Suriname, Syria, Tajikistan, Togo, UAE, Venezuela, Yemen, Zambia and Zimbabwe.

upload_2020-7-2_10-57-10-png.647338
I laughed as I read each country. In other words, the afterthoughts of the world.

Just because a country is nonwhite, including African, doesn't mean they are an "afterthought", or that their is opinion is less important or less relevant than whites' opinion. Black voices matter. White supremacism is disgusting.
 
.
What we were in the past for USA, is what you are today for the USA. Now figure it out, yourself.


Nah our objective is selective... we aren't dumb.... to allow someone to drone attack in our soil...am not sure about you.. when US and India have common objective am pretty sure, to take sidelines... that's how a country works... grow up...
 
.
More than 70 countries voice support for China's HK national security law at UNHRC
Source:Global Times Published: 2020/7/3 13:48:36
ae1b9fc5-203b-4791-8b2b-d387455945bc.jpeg

Hong Kong citizens on Tuesday gather to support the National Security Law for Hong Kong. Photo: cnsphoto


Representatives from more than 20 countries voiced support for China's enactment of the national security law for Hong Kong at the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) in Geneva on Wednesday and Thursday, following a joint statement that Cuba made on Tuesday on behalf of 53 countries to endorse the passage of the law.

Russia's representative said Russia firmly supports China in implementing the "one country, two systems" principle in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR) and that Hong Kong affairs are entirely China's internal affairs.

Laos' representative said Laos welcomes China's effort to safeguard national security through the establishment and improvement of the legal system and enforcement mechanism for the HKSAR. Representatives from Myanmar and Cambodia stated the legislative power for national security falls under the sovereignty of one country, and China's national security law for Hong Kong is conducive to safeguarding national security and maintaining the "one country, two systems" principle. They hope the HKSAR can maintain peace, stability and prosperity without interference from foreign countries.

The representative from Afghanistan stressed that the law will not undermine the "one country, two systems" principle and the legitimate rights, freedoms and interests of Hong Kong residents. Cabo Verde's representative said China's national security law for the HKSAR comes under China's sovereignty and it has nothing to do with human rights issues.

Burundi said it welcomes China's efforts to promote and protect human rights and its contributions to the international human rights cause. The representative said the law will protect the human rights of Hong Kong residents, noting that both the HKSAR and the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region are integral parts of China. Burundi urged relevant countries to immediately cease acts that are in violation of the Charter of the United Nations, which include using Hong Kong and Xinjiang affairs and human rights issues to interfere in China's internal affairs.

North Korea, Venezuela and Cameroon said they resolutely opposed relevant countries use of Hong Kong and Xinjiang affairs to interfere in China's internal affairs.

Serbia, Armenia and Chad expressed their adherence to the one-China principle, support for China's efforts to safeguard its sovereignty and territorial integrity, and the "one country, two systems" principle.

Nepal and Kyrgyzstan also stressed that Hong Kong affairs are China's internal affairs. Tanzania emphasized that both Hong Kong and Taiwan are integral parts of China and said it opposes the politicization of human rights issues.

The Maldives said that China is one of its important cooperative partners and the development of bilateral relations has always been based on the principle of mutual respect for sovereignty and territorial integrity. Under the "one country, two systems" principle, Hong Kong residents will enjoy stability, prosperity and freedom.

Ethiopia, Cote d'Ivoire and Madagascar said Hong Kong affairs were China's internal affairs. They said the UNHRC should abide by the principles of objectivity, impartiality, constructiveness, non-politicization and non-selectivity, and it should refrain from politicizing human rights issues or adopting double standards.

Indonesia, Vietnam, Bahrain, Sudan, Algeria, Nigeria and Morocco said that all countries should abide by the basic norms governing international relations, including non-interference in other countries' internal affairs, and said they oppose interference in other countries' internal affairs using the excuse of human rights issues.
 
.
This is list of 27 countries that voted against China:

Australia, Austria, Belgium, Belize, Canada, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Iceland, Ireland, Germany, Japan, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, the Republic of the Marshall Islands, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Palau, Slovakia, Slovenia, Sweden, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom

https://www.gov.uk/government/speec...-regional-statement-on-hong-kong-and-xinjiang

Apparently, Germany voted against China.
All White, Western countries.



SO did China just take back Hong Kong WITHOUT FIRING 1 BULLET?? where were the 300 aircraft carriers to stop this???? this is historical. Countries are taking back things they couldnt do for centuries without firing 1 damn bullet.

More than 70 countries voice support for China's HK national security law at UNHRC
Source:Global Times Published: 2020/7/3 13:48:36
ae1b9fc5-203b-4791-8b2b-d387455945bc.jpeg

Hong Kong citizens on Tuesday gather to support the National Security Law for Hong Kong. Photo: cnsphoto


Representatives from more than 20 countries voiced support for China's enactment of the national security law for Hong Kong at the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) in Geneva on Wednesday and Thursday, following a joint statement that Cuba made on Tuesday on behalf of 53 countries to endorse the passage of the law.

Russia's representative said Russia firmly supports China in implementing the "one country, two systems" principle in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR) and that Hong Kong affairs are entirely China's internal affairs.

Laos' representative said Laos welcomes China's effort to safeguard national security through the establishment and improvement of the legal system and enforcement mechanism for the HKSAR. Representatives from Myanmar and Cambodia stated the legislative power for national security falls under the sovereignty of one country, and China's national security law for Hong Kong is conducive to safeguarding national security and maintaining the "one country, two systems" principle. They hope the HKSAR can maintain peace, stability and prosperity without interference from foreign countries.

The representative from Afghanistan stressed that the law will not undermine the "one country, two systems" principle and the legitimate rights, freedoms and interests of Hong Kong residents. Cabo Verde's representative said China's national security law for the HKSAR comes under China's sovereignty and it has nothing to do with human rights issues.

Burundi said it welcomes China's efforts to promote and protect human rights and its contributions to the international human rights cause. The representative said the law will protect the human rights of Hong Kong residents, noting that both the HKSAR and the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region are integral parts of China. Burundi urged relevant countries to immediately cease acts that are in violation of the Charter of the United Nations, which include using Hong Kong and Xinjiang affairs and human rights issues to interfere in China's internal affairs.

North Korea, Venezuela and Cameroon said they resolutely opposed relevant countries use of Hong Kong and Xinjiang affairs to interfere in China's internal affairs.

Serbia, Armenia and Chad expressed their adherence to the one-China principle, support for China's efforts to safeguard its sovereignty and territorial integrity, and the "one country, two systems" principle.

Nepal and Kyrgyzstan also stressed that Hong Kong affairs are China's internal affairs. Tanzania emphasized that both Hong Kong and Taiwan are integral parts of China and said it opposes the politicization of human rights issues.

The Maldives said that China is one of its important cooperative partners and the development of bilateral relations has always been based on the principle of mutual respect for sovereignty and territorial integrity. Under the "one country, two systems" principle, Hong Kong residents will enjoy stability, prosperity and freedom.

Ethiopia, Cote d'Ivoire and Madagascar said Hong Kong affairs were China's internal affairs. They said the UNHRC should abide by the principles of objectivity, impartiality, constructiveness, non-politicization and non-selectivity, and it should refrain from politicizing human rights issues or adopting double standards.

Indonesia, Vietnam, Bahrain, Sudan, Algeria, Nigeria and Morocco said that all countries should abide by the basic norms governing international relations, including non-interference in other countries' internal affairs, and said they oppose interference in other countries' internal affairs using the excuse of human rights issues.
Confirmation of China's favorable view by a considerable and large chunk of the world's population.
 
.
I laughed as I read each country. In other words, the afterthoughts of the world.

This guy is super delusional. What alternative power you get from Somalia.

What kind of world are you living in where you devalue and mock countries and their people because they are not rich Western countries?

For your information, these countries have performed vastly better than either the USA or India in the coronavirus pandemic, a pandemic which is the greatest test the world has faced in some years. Somalia as well, so where is your attitude of superiority now?
 
.
What kind of world are you living in where you devalue and mock countries and their people because they are not rich Western countries?

for these disgusting racists, black lives don't matter. they even use racial slurs that former US president Obama considers shameful, offensive and "pisses him off". there is no low that they won't go to.
 
. . . .
What kind of world are you living in where you devalue and mock countries and their people because they are not rich Western countries?

For your information, these countries have performed vastly better than either the USA or India in the coronavirus pandemic, a pandemic which is the greatest test the world has faced in some years. Somalia as well, so where is your attitude of superiority now?

I am not against any country. Don't be naive. In UN, some countries have bigger say and more equal than others. Why don't china relinquishits VETO power in UN as permanent member and give it to pakistan or somalia.
 
.
I am not against any country. Don't be naive. In UN, some countries have bigger say and more equal than others. Why don't china relinquishits VETO power in UN as permanent member and give it to pakistan or somalia.

In the UN general assembly all countries are equal. In UNSC, they are all equal except the P5. So yes, Somalia is equal to India in the UN.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom