What's new

US hints it could use nuclear weapons once again to create ‘decisive results’ in wars

It would be the end of humanity, if you use them in countries without a nuclear weapon the damage will be limited to that country and to the neighbors, but certainly the honor throws it into the thorny brambles.
if, on the other hand, you use them against countries with nuclear weapons, you are sure that others will respond with nuclear weapons, with a response and a countermove, there is the risk of a nuclear holocaust also for the United States
Exactly that , if a country want to survive against hostile countries it must have to achieve the deterrence power . We learned it from the destruction of Iraq and Syria . When Qaddafi compromised his nuclear activities with exchange of western friendship, he was vulnerable and destroyed quickly.
But Kim played a very good game with Trump and buy some time . Now USA don'the dare to bomb North Korea.

On the other hand The Islamic Republic is threatened by hostile neighbors and entrenched by America to invade. One of it's enemy itself a nuclear weapons state – has been bomberding it's foreign bases and killing dozens.
Iran gambled it's national interests by signing JCPOA before achieving nuclear capabilities is the main cause of its economic humiliation .
It was a strategic mistake by Iran to negotiate before it had nuclear weapons.
Tehran should have followed the successful strategy of North Korea,
negotiating only after it had bombs and delivery systems.
It is a matter of sorrow that IRI buried it's nuclear activities, fully compliances with the deal, they get nothing from other signatories except ' sorry ' and uf ah . They didn't learned from the treacherous behaviour of the west , from the fate of Qaddafi.
 
without american involvement red army is fighting hitler for survival
That is wrong. Without red army, American will never defeat Hitler. Have you ever read about encounter of western front between Western allies against Nazi in western fronts. It was almost a disaster for allies. The only fact they succeed in Normandy and Africa campaign were becos large number of Nazi are send to eastern front to deal with a bigger threat of Russian. The most inferior and weakest are left behind to deal with western allies.

Same as Asian WWII campaign. Without American involvement. Red army can defeat whole IJA in China campaign in just 8months once Russia declared war on Japan. Manchuria campaign last less than a month. Russian have 20000 T-34 and 6000 KV-1 heavy tank. 600000 artillery pieces with caliber far bigger and longer range than anything IJA can thrown at them.
 
That is wrong. Without red army, American will never defeat Hitler. Have you ever read about encounter of western front between Western allies against Nazi in western fronts. It was almost a disaster for allies. The only fact they succeed in Normandy and Africa campaign were becos large number of Nazi are send to eastern front to deal with a bigger threat of Russian. The most inferior and weakest are left behind to deal with western allies.

Same as Asian WWII campaign. Without American involvement. Red army can defeat whole IJA in China campaign in just 8months once Russia declared war on Japan. Manchuria campaign last less than a week. They have 20000 T-34 and 6000 KV-1 heavy tank. 600000 artillery pieces with caliber far bigger and longer range than anything IJA can thrown at them.

after elite Japanese units have been slaughtered on pacific islands, japanese air force decimated, japanese military industrial complex firebombed for 4 years
 
after elite Japanese units have been slaughtered on pacific islands, japanese air force decimated, japanese military industrial complex firebombed for 4 years
LOL... Check out Kwantung army history. Stop BS and dont make a fool of yourself with things you do not familiar with..

The core of Kwantung army still stay in China and they are based in Manchuria. Even Japan never bombed Pearl Harbour, the IJA can never defeat the Red army once Russian massive industries started chewing out those T-34 and KV1 heavy tank.
 
I think they are bluffing just to project power, and put it out for the reason.
Not sure, USA has used it twice and remains the only state to do so in the history of mankind and you'll be surprised that there are a lot of people who defend and justify the use of nukes
 
Exactly that , if a country want to survive against hostile countries it must have to achieve the deterrence power . We learned it from the destruction of Iraq and Syria . When Qaddafi compromised his nuclear activities with exchange of western friendship, he was vulnerable and destroyed quickly.
But Kim played a very good game with Trump and buy some time . Now USA don'the dare to bomb North Korea.

On the other hand The Islamic Republic is threatened by hostile neighbors and entrenched by America to invade. One of it's enemy itself a nuclear weapons state – has been bomberding it's foreign bases and killing dozens.
Iran gambled it's national interests by signing JCPOA before achieving nuclear capabilities is the main cause of its economic humiliation .
It was a strategic mistake by Iran to negotiate before it had nuclear weapons.
Tehran should have followed the successful strategy of North Korea,
negotiating only after it had bombs and delivery systems.
It is a matter of sorrow that IRI buried it's nuclear activities, fully compliances with the deal, they get nothing from other signatories except ' sorry ' and uf ah . They didn't learned from the treacherous behaviour of the west , from the fate of Qaddafi.

Absolutely perfect. Word for word.
 
Please can you repeat your question and you might get the answer?

Where's the war, which is pressing US to use nukes? or is it just another one of those attempts to justify Iranian terrorism in region.
 

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom