What's new

US giant Walmart quits India after venture ends

Edevelop

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Feb 2, 2007
Messages
14,735
Reaction score
23
Country
Pakistan
Location
Turkey
MUMBAI: Walmart and Indian firm Bharti announced Wednesday they were ending their retail partnership, with the US giant saying India’s foreign investment rules were partly to blame for the split.

The companies said they would “independently own and operate separate business formats”, ending an alliance aimed at building Walmart’s presence in India’s potentially lucrative retail sector.

The world’s biggest retailer has operated since 2007 in India as a wholesaler via its partnership with Bharti, but it was restricted from selling directly to consumers.

Walmart said it wanted to operate supermarkets in India after New Delhi moved last year to open up the retail sector to foreign companies as part of steps to boost a sharply slowing economy.

But the group has been frustrated by the government’s new conditions for foreign direct investment (FDI), an internal bribery probe and the faltering relationship with Bharti, owner of India’s top mobile phone firm.

Walmart told AFP in an email the decision to split with Bharti was based on “external and internal factors, including the new FDI policy”.

“Under the requirements contained in the new FDI policy Walmart could not invest in multi-brand retail through the existing Bharti Retail business,” a Walmart India spokesperson said in the email, without elaborating.

Walmart must now find another local partner to own 49 percent of the business if it plans to push ahead with operating supermarkets under the government’s rules.

A year ago, New Delhi allowed foreign supermarkets to establish 51 percent joint ventures in the country as part of a drive to seek outside investment, but so far none have applied.

Analysts said the split showed the government must do more to improve FDI rules to attract overseas companies and spur economic growth, which has slackened to a decade-low.

“This could further caution international firms looking to enter India,” said Saloni Nangia, president of consultancy firm Technopak, of Walmart’s announcement.

“From a destination perspective, foreign firms want to be in India. But from a policy and doing-business perspective, it is different. The government needs to do more to facilitate this,” she said.

Opposition lawmakers in the past have expressed concern over Walmart’s entry, saying it would hurt local “mom and pop” stores.

With the Bharti venture ending, Walmart is not expected to rush into making fresh India investments, said Sonam Udasi, head of research with IDBI capital.

“Walmart will study the on-the-ground situation, particularly future government policies in retail,” he told AFP.

Walmart said in July it was unable to meet the government’s requirements — stipulating that 30 percent of its products must come from local small-scale industries — for it to open retail stores.

A senior Indian commerce ministry official late Wednesday said the government had “no plans to relax the 30 percent local sourcing norms”.

India’s FDI policy “cannot be company specific,” the official, Saurabh Chandra, told the Press Trust of India.

Under the breakup terms, Walmart will acquire Bharti’s stake in the wholesale business, giving it 100 percent ownership.

Nangia said Walmart is likely to stay focused on its cash-and-carry business, which would help to build up its supply chain to support any future retail venture.

Scott Price, president and chief executive of Walmart Asia, said the company would “continue to advocate for investment conditions that allow FDI multi-brand retail in India”.

US giant Walmart quits India after venture ends – The Express Tribune
 
.
MUMBAI: Walmart and Indian firm Bharti announced Wednesday they were ending their retail partnership, with the US giant saying India’s foreign investment rules were partly to blame for the split.

The companies said they would “independently own and operate separate business formats”, ending an alliance aimed at building Walmart’s presence in India’s potentially lucrative retail sector.

The world’s biggest retailer has operated since 2007 in India as a wholesaler via its partnership with Bharti, but it was restricted from selling directly to consumers.

Walmart said it wanted to operate supermarkets in India after New Delhi moved last year to open up the retail sector to foreign companies as part of steps to boost a sharply slowing economy.

But the group has been frustrated by the government’s new conditions for foreign direct investment (FDI), an internal bribery probe and the faltering relationship with Bharti, owner of India’s top mobile phone firm.

Walmart told AFP in an email the decision to split with Bharti was based on “external and internal factors, including the new FDI policy”.

“Under the requirements contained in the new FDI policy Walmart could not invest in multi-brand retail through the existing Bharti Retail business,” a Walmart India spokesperson said in the email, without elaborating.

Walmart must now find another local partner to own 49 percent of the business if it plans to push ahead with operating supermarkets under the government’s rules.

A year ago, New Delhi allowed foreign supermarkets to establish 51 percent joint ventures in the country as part of a drive to seek outside investment, but so far none have applied.

Analysts said the split showed the government must do more to improve FDI rules to attract overseas companies and spur economic growth, which has slackened to a decade-low.

“This could further caution international firms looking to enter India,” said Saloni Nangia, president of consultancy firm Technopak, of Walmart’s announcement.

“From a destination perspective, foreign firms want to be in India. But from a policy and doing-business perspective, it is different. The government needs to do more to facilitate this,” she said.

Opposition lawmakers in the past have expressed concern over Walmart’s entry, saying it would hurt local “mom and pop” stores.

With the Bharti venture ending, Walmart is not expected to rush into making fresh India investments, said Sonam Udasi, head of research with IDBI capital.

“Walmart will study the on-the-ground situation, particularly future government policies in retail,” he told AFP.

Walmart said in July it was unable to meet the government’s requirements — stipulating that 30 percent of its products must come from local small-scale industries — for it to open retail stores.

A senior Indian commerce ministry official late Wednesday said the government had “no plans to relax the 30 percent local sourcing norms”.

India’s FDI policy “cannot be company specific,” the official, Saurabh Chandra, told the Press Trust of India.

Under the breakup terms, Walmart will acquire Bharti’s stake in the wholesale business, giving it 100 percent ownership.

Nangia said Walmart is likely to stay focused on its cash-and-carry business, which would help to build up its supply chain to support any future retail venture.

Scott Price, president and chief executive of Walmart Asia, said the company would “continue to advocate for investment conditions that allow FDI multi-brand retail in India”.

US giant Walmart quits India after venture ends – The Express Tribune
:rofl::omghaha::lol::D:blink::undecided::rolleyes::lazy:
 
.
I'm happy in one way, given the number of products they import from China. It'd be more conducive for Indian SMEs and consumers if Future group, Vishal marts are allowed to fill in the void of organized retail chain.

My thumbs up for their exit. :tup:
 
.
I'm happy in one way, given the number of products they import from China. It'd be more conducive for Indian SMEs and consumers if Future group, Vishal marts are allowed to fill in the void of organized retail chain.

My thumbs up for their exit. :tup:
Walmart isn't going anywhere..Best Price goes to Walmart and Easyday to Bharti.
 
.
It's good walmart is going away. Walmart is not good for small shop keepers. These small shop keepers are self employed people who feed their family because of their shops. Plus, Walmart would have imported cheap chinese products killing the local manufacturers.
 
.
I'm happy in one way, given the number of products they import from China. It'd be more conducive for Indian SMEs and consumers if Future group, Vishal marts are allowed to fill in the void of organized retail chain.

My thumbs up for their exit. :tup:

DUde, I don't agree. It's one thing to look at the 'evil' retailer, but on the other our protectionists (especially the boneless left m^%^R%%^&#), ignore that our retail productivitly is amongst the lowest in the world. In fact we can drastically increase employment nos. by opening this sector up.
 
.
Infact thats a good news... I never wanted that company to be in India. No foreign company should be allowed which is unable to purchase 30 percent of its products from local small-scale industries
 
.
DUde, I don't agree. It's one thing to look at the 'evil' retailer, but on the other our protectionists (especially the boneless left m^%^R%%^&#), ignore that our retail productivitly is amongst the lowest in the world. In fact we can drastically increase employment nos. by opening this sector up.

I agree to that, investment in retail chains can open up many small to medium scale industries in India. But government's reluctance in investing in infrastructure and proper environment for manufacturing, i don't see any apparent advantage of it. Ultimately a large segment of their products will be imported from China.
 
.
I'm happy in one way, given the number of products they import from China. It'd be more conducive for Indian SMEs and consumers if Future group, Vishal marts are allowed to fill in the void of organized retail chain.

My thumbs up for their exit. :tup:

Your unscrupulous businessmen import cheap and shoddy products from China by the shiploads。

Worse,some of these people rebrand Made-in-China goods and sell them as their own。

You lot don't make or are incapable of making anything。You have no choice but buy from China,via majors like Malmart or your own tiny outlets。

After all,Indians can't afford quality Chinese products,they are only worthy of those made in rural families‘ backyards。:wave:
 
.
Your unscrupulous businessmen import cheap and shoddy products from China by the shiploads。

Worse,some of these people rebrand Made-in-China goods and sell them as their own。

You lot don't make or are incapable of making anything。You have no choice but buy from China,via majors like Malmart or your own tiny outlets。

After all,Indians can't afford quality Chinese products,they are only worthy of those made in rural families‘ backyards。:wave:

What quality products you make anyway, of Chinese branding? Just curious.
 
.
Your unscrupulous businessmen import cheap and shoddy products from China by the shiploads。

Worse,some of these people rebrand Made-in-China goods and sell them as their own。

You lot don't make or are incapable of making anything。You have no choice but buy from China,via majors like Malmart or your own tiny outlets。

After all,Indians can't afford quality Chinese products,they are only worthy of those made in rural families‘ backyards。:wave:

'Pulsar' to 'Gulsar'

 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
What quality products you make anyway, of Chinese branding? Just curious.

Chinese brand Lining sports gears, e.g. the badminton racket is one of the best and it costs a US$200-300. Huawei telecommunication product rivals Cisco. Many others which you're probably not aware. Chinese liquor Moutai costs a bomb too.
 
. .
Chinese brand Lining sports gears, e.g. the badminton racket is one of the best and it costs a US$200-300. Huawei telecommunication product rivals Cisco. Many others which you're probably not aware. Chinese liquor Moutai costs a bomb too.

Yeah, I'm sure there are many brands Chinese are aware of, I think the question was what Chinese brand would Indians consumers be buying(Lenovo excepted)? I think Indians look at Chinese products more generically rather than as a brand which is why barring Lenovo, no Chinese brand has any real traction in the minds of the Indian consumer.
 
.
Yeah, I'm sure there are many brands Chinese are aware of, I think the question was what Chinese brand would Indians consumers be buying(Lenovo excepted)? I think Indians look at Chinese products more generically rather than as a brand which is why barring Lenovo, no Chinese brand has any real traction in the minds of the Indian consumer.

LOL, the world knows Lining sports gear and Huawei. They are simply too expensive for Indian consumers.
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom