US denounces Quetta attack, offers Pakistan cooperation

[TMA]

We all know what the real and behind the scene core objectives of Afghanistan occupation. Anyone who beleive that India can run its terrorist campaign since 9/11 against Pakistan using Afghan soil as the launching pad, right under the nose of American overlords, is simply living in fools paradise.

We in Pakistan start to question this nexus between America and India informally (through media) and formally (at government level).



Problem is the GOP never worked or projected this angel of the WOT which is hurting Pakistan and its image, from being a actual victim of terror to be labelled as the breeding ground of terror. We all know, this axis of evil between America and India is deep rooted and solely against Pakistan (China is a smoke screen). We cannot neutralised this unholly alliance, unless we have build a strong narrative against it, both internally and globally.

Well said however there are three main objectives IMHO: destabilize Pakistan; contain China; contain Russia.
Of course the prime is Pakistan.

Raise this narrative with Pakistanis whenever and whereever you meet them. It will shock you that many of them don't have a clue and many of them just don't care.
They actually think that OBL and his team managed to outwit the most defended airspace in the world and cause three towers to fall in free fall with two planes (without inside help) and that is why NATO went into Afghanistan!!

Erm, so has India. And not billions in military assistance, but billions in preventing your poor citizens from starving on the streets and billions to ensure that your poor citizens know that they do their number two's in the bathroom and not in the streets, and billions to ensure your poor citizens know when to 'pull-out' after ravaging a poor, blind and deaf Dalit girl found in a dark alley in the slums of Delhi. The same country which has topped US economic aid over the last 70 years is now bragging about being a 'rising shining Vedic shupa pawa'. We're not. Over this decade, we've mostly received military assistance, and the US economic aid which does go to us is lost due to local corruption (no surprise there) or due to kickbacks and salaries to contractors. It's nothing more than a Bharati wet dream to believe the second the US pulls out of it's relationship with Pakistan, the latter will collapse and Bharatis can hurriedly march over the border and bring about the formation of 'Akhand Bharat'.

"Vedic shupa pawa"...you know I would not be surprised if the RSS ideology which is behind the Modi government actually have an eschatology from the Vedic perspective where Akhand Bharat is actualized before the end of histor(y)ical cycle. A little bit like the eschatology of the Children of Israel in where the Israel of David & Solomon (PBUT) is realized before the end of history. They certainly are intimate bed fellows even more so than Israel and USA (IMHO).

 

[Thorough Pro]

Who needs US to stop them when two bullets can do the job
We need a merciless pro-active homeland security agency with one solution to every problem, take every mother fucker out anywhere in the world who even sneezes in our direction

first thing America can do is shut down people like Dona and Khalizad who are advocating insurgency and breakup of Pakistan. and discourage India from using Afghanistan as a launch pad of BLA related terror.

 

[Solomon2]

first thing America can do is shut down people like Dona and Khalizad who are advocating insurgency and breakup of Pakistan. and discourage India from using Afghanistan as a launch pad of BLA related terror.

If it was 1970, would you encourage the Pakistani Army to suppress East Pakistan by force, rather than let it go, or let the politicians sort it out? How much of the problem is due to the fact Pakistan became a more centralized state than Baluchis expected, and thus their leaders lost the limited independence they were promised? Is the only difference between the E. Pakistani and Baluchi situations that it's easier to apply military pressure in Baluchistan than it was in E. Pakistan?

 

[Hiptullha]

If it was 1970, would you encourage the Pakistani Army to suppress East Pakistan by force, rather than let it go, or let the politicians sort it out? How much of the problem is due to the fact Pakistan became a more centralized state than Baluchis expected, and thus their leaders lost the limited independence they were promised? Is the only difference between the E. Pakistani and Baluchi situations that it's easier to apply military pressure in Baluchistan than it was in E. Pakistan?

Erm, how is this response relevant to the post you replied to? Does the US now have the de-facto role of deciding which states and provinces require more independence and autonomy and which states and provinces don't?

 

[OrionHunter]

So has India. And not billions in military assistance, but billions in preventing your poor citizens from starving on the streets and billions to ensure that your poor citizens know that they do their number two's in the bathroom and not in the streets, and billions to ensure your poor citizens know when to 'pull-out' after ravaging a poor, blind and deaf Dalit girl found in a dark alley in the slums of Delhi. The same country which has topped US economic aid over the last 70 years is now bragging about being a 'rising shining Vedic shupa pawa'. We're not. Over this decade, we've mostly received military assistance, and the US economic aid which does go to us is lost due to local corruption (no surprise there) or due to kickbacks and salaries to contractors. It's nothing more than a Bharati wet dream to believe the second the US pulls out of it's relationship with Pakistan, the latter will collapse and Bharatis can hurriedly march over the border and bring about the formation of 'Akhand Bharat'.

Do you always talk like a moron or is your post a one-off case?

US economic aid to India had been spread out over various sectors and programs, including child survival and health, development assistance, HIV/AIDS initiatives, migration and refugee assistance, food aid, and narcotics control. Whereas your aid has gone into buying war-like equipment, arms, ammo, airplanes, missiles, your nuclear program and so on by clandestinely diverting funds meant for development! Get the difference? No wonder you guys are deep in the rabbit hole whereas India has become an emerging power with a 7.5% GDP growth rate, and a $2.5 trillion economy. You are still stuck at a measly 3.5-4% and heading further South.

 

[Hiptullha]

Do you always talk like a moron or is your post a one-off case?

Oh boy, you call me a moron and then go on to display how much air there is between those dark goblin ears of yours.

Whereas your aid has gone into buying war-like equipment, arms, ammo, airplanes, missiles, your nuclear program and so on by clandestinely diverting funds meant for development! Get the difference?

Of course nitwit, that's the exact difference I was trying to point out.

. And not billions in military assistance, but billions in preventing your poor citizens from starving on the streets and billions to ensure that your poor citizens know that they do their number two's in the bathroom and not in the streets, and billions to ensure your poor citizens know when to 'pull-out' after ravaging a poor, blind and deaf Dalit girl found in a dark alley in the slums of Delhi.

Now lets take a look at your original post one more time...

You have been walking on American crutches since the late 40s!

Says the Bharati whose country required USAID to accomplish (in your own words):

child survival and health

development assistance

HIV/AIDS initiatives

food aid

That's right, Pakistan's been on US crutches since existence while Bharat has been fuelled by shupa dupa sheekret Vedic technology for 70 years.

Get real. You do need American dollars.

For what? Paying off our debt? We've predominantly received military assistance and apparently diverted our development assistance to spend more on our military (according to you). If American aid isn't already 'propping up' our economy, what the heck are you blathering on about?

You are still stuck at a measly 3.5-4% and heading further South.

In your wet dreams, perhaps. I don't know what metric your using to prove that Pakistan is 'heading further South', but if it comes from the same government apparently fudging Indian GDP data using speshial Vedic mathematics, I'd rather not consult it myself.