What's new

US Defense Secretary Panetta threatens ground intervention into Pakistan

Status
Not open for further replies.
lookslike obama needs to hire mary meyer


draft_lens3276922module23347242photo_1238104741Dog_Barking_Relief_Bookcover.jpg
 
A number of recent tests of NASR and BAbur suggest that someone in Pakistan is expecting a ground invasion.


I suppose as US-Pakistan tension was building up over the supply routes , the americans must have conveyed threats to Pakistan to which Pakistan responded by doing missile tests all the while refusing to open the supply routes.
The tensions have now spilled out in the open with leon panetta barking left right and centre like mad dog , that’s what one can make out
 
I suppose as US-Pakistan tension was building up over the supply routes , the americans must have conveyed threats to Pakistan to which Pakistan responded by doing missile tests all the while refusing to open the supply routes.
The tensions have now spilled out in the open with leon panetta barking left right and centre like mad dog , that’s what one can make out

I see it as more of operational preparedness for whatever the PA is anticipating.
 
There are several points, which America always overlook. Pak Army Is already fighting militants in Two agencies of FATA. Mohmand And Orakzai, if a stretched army opens another front in North waziristan then how they gonna flush out the militants? Pakistan Army is clearing the mess in other areas so when they, go to final battle there will be no loose ends.

Second thing, Besides Haqqani, there is Mullah Omar who is actually holding 70 percent afghanistan, so instead of blaming each and every thing on Pakistan, why don't they try to capture the 70 percent area from Mullah Omar from where attacks originate on them.
 
its the best way to describe indian placement in the american scheme of thing over the last decade , does that make it clear ?



if you are saying 'we' as in 'we americans' then yes , you have lost


I beg to differ. We successfully invaded the country, removed the Taliban from the government, appointed a puppet regime. Implemented western reforms, made a standing army with education and opened the country up to investment and self reliance.
 
I beg to differ. We successfully invaded the country, removed the Taliban from the government, appointed a puppet regime. Implemented western reforms, made a standing army with education and opened the country up to investment and self reliance.

Almost 90% of the Afghanistan is under the control of Talibans . even the afghanistan army hates amrika and regularly killing those beasts.
 

HAHAHAHAHA !! Yeah, right. Computer courage !!
:rofl:

The place i belong from on average 10 people are killed everyday, When i leave home i am not sure if i would be back or not, I am sure my "computer courage" is more than an average American, If you beg to differ than kindly do come over to Karachi and try living here for a month, I'll introduce you to the fascinating world of Layari, Katti Pahari, Azizabad, Al-Asif Square and others and than we can discuss "courage" :)
 
I beg to differ. We successfully invaded the country, removed the Taliban from the government, appointed a puppet regime. Implemented western reforms, made a standing army with education and opened the country up to investment and self reliance.

I thought you introduced democracy?? It's good to see you telling the truth on something for a change. btw I do believe that American losses are being hidden. The real cost to America of its barking which is hidden from its public is here:

http://www.defence.pk/forums/u-s-de...s-exceed-vietnam-war-numbers.html#post3029515
 
bro , you've got the right idea

we need to float a simple slogan --- 'aik goli , aik amreki' ( one bullet , one american )

it should be declared wajib on all 180 million Pakistanis to kill at least one american , should they attack our country

When combatants start climbing out the woodwork with one bullet each, the americans will burn down hte woodwork.

this idea isnt good at all. it is an idea calling for a general slaughter of civilians as the moment they take up arms as you suggest they are combatants. Ill prepared, untrained , unorganised combatants at that

Also. "one man one bullet" was a concept the french came up with over two hundred years ago to conscript the men they needed to field an army
 
I Think the supply route issue will remain unresolved with the incumbent government in Pakistan & Americans will have to wait the outcome of next general election in PAK.
 
Copy that!
I Think the supply route issue will remain unresolved with the incumbent government in Pakistan & Americans will have to wait the outcome of next general election in PAK.

False-flagger :)
I beg to differ. We successfully invaded the country, removed the Taliban from the government, appointed a puppet regime. Implemented western reforms, made a standing army with education and opened the country up to investment and self reliance.
 
3000+ coalition casualties in Afghanistan ( 2000+ are american )
4000+ coalition casualties in raq ( 4000+ are american )
iCasualties: Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom Casualties
so there are 7000+ collation casualties out of which 6000+ are US casualties and the way the pentagon classifies a casualty in a theatre of war is if a serviceman is declared dead in an enemy encounter otherwise if the soldier dies during evacuation or is left permanently crippled then those figure is not included.
There are twice as many that have been left disabled due sustaining injuries resulting in amputations.
Wars are bad and ugly, Americans are not gods that cannot be killed, and if they attack others they will also get killed.

Google Iwo Jima some time
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom