What's new

US B-52 bombers fly close to Guangdong coast

Tokhme khar

BANNED
Joined
Feb 25, 2017
Messages
2,507
Reaction score
-10
Country
Japan
Location
Iran, Islamic Republic Of
Trump now trying to scare China, while China laughs at the Orangutan.

5aa84ff22b47ca2e19cb946e50f6d93f_w-630x378.jpg

A file photo of a B-52 bomber. Photo: AP

US B-52 bombers fly close to Guangdong coast
Rarely had US strategic bombers been seen above waters so close to the Chinese shore
By Asia Times staff April 26, 2018 4:01 PM (UTC+8)
A pair of US B-52 Stratofortress strategic bombers reportedly flew within 250 kilometers of Guangdong’s coastline in southern China on Tuesday afternoon, according to Taiwan media and Aircraft Spots, a Twitter group that tracks aircraft movement and the deployment of the US Air Force.

The two long-range bombers, bearing registration numbers 57-1454 and 60-0360 with call signs HERO01 and HERO02, were spotted above the Bashi Channel between Taiwan and the Philippines and were believed to have come from the US outpost of Guam.

The bombers flew westward into the northern portion of the South China Sea and circled for about an hour above the Pratas Islands controlled by Taiwan, about 340 kilometers southeast of Hong Kong, before following another zigzag path back to the Kadena Air Base in the US territory, as shown in flight tracks posted by Aircraft Spots. It is also believed that the two bombers conducted air-to-air refueling near Okinawa.

f9732c9b0b2643f398b15dd7ca0d03dd20180426083019.jpeg

Posts by Aircraft Spots about the path of two US B-52 bombers. Photo: Twitter
The Taipei-based Liberty Times noted that rarely had US strategic bombers been seen above the waters close to the Chinese shore, where People’s Liberation Army bombers and spy planes such as H-6Ks used to frequent the air routes, when Beijing dispatched squadrons of aircraft to circumnavigate Taiwan.

The paper said the flight route indicated the bombers could have been involved in a mock attack involving Tomahawk cruise missiles targeting Guangdong’s coastal areas.

The maximum hit radius of a Tomahawk cruise missile is 2,500km. If fired from the Pratas Islands, a large number of PLA military installations would be within range.

The emergence of the B-52s was a tacit message that the US would respond if Beijing were to continue with its breaches of Taiwan’s airspace, said observers.

It is discernible that Beijing has sought to penetrate the blockade of the so called Second Island Chain – formed by the Ogasawara Islands and Volcano Islands of Japan, in addition to the US territory of Mariana Islands – with retrofitted H-6K bombers with extended range, fitted with precision-guided munitions, such as the air-launched version of the CJ-10K land-attack missiles.

These missiles have an operational range of 1,500km and are capable of hitting targets in Guam if fired from H-6Ks above the waters off Taiwan’s Pacific coast.

Also, rumor has it that Beijing’s H-6Ks, with aerial refueling, could fly close to Guam for direct bombardment, though the somewhat antiquated Chinese bombers modeled on a Soviet design have no stealth capabilities and could easily be detected by radar in Taiwan, Japan and Guam.

China’s defense ministry is yet to respond to the possible intrusion of China’s air defense zone and it is unclear if Chinese radar was triggered or Chinese aircraft conducted an interception.

But Chinese news portal Sina noted in a commentary on Thursday that the bulky B-52 bombers were equally vulnerable to Chinese radar, airborne early warning aircraft and even the powerful S-400 Triumf anti-aircraft missiles imported from Russia.

http://www.atimes.com/article/us-b-52-bombers-fly-close-to-guangdong-coast/
 
.
American air force answered for the calling of Chinese officer about Taiwan issues. They will attacked China if China launchs an invasion toward Taiwan
 
. . . .
American air force answered for the calling of Chinese officer about Taiwan issues. They will attacked China if China launchs an invasion toward Taiwan
This is just showmanship. But comes to real Taiwan Strait War. American will hide one corner. US cant even spare the death of few hundred soldiers dying for Afghanistan. Talking about dying for Taiwan is a joke :enjoy:
 
.
Also, rumor has it that Beijing’s H-6Ks, with aerial refueling, could fly close to Guam for direct bombardment, though the somewhat antiquated Chinese bombers modeled on a Soviet design have no stealth capabilities and could easily be detected by radar in Taiwan, Japan and Guam.
And B-52's do? The B-52 is the same age as the Tu-16. What sort of drooling dim-wits write these "articles"?
 
.
paid chinese mercenaries in HK/ Singapore, who work for and socialize with western expats in HK...that's who write these articles.

And B-52's do? The B-52 is the same age as the Tu-16. What sort of drooling dim-wits write these "articles"?
 
. .
The US would be able to target facilities deep within Chinese territory using a combination of stealthy JASSM, AGM-86C/D, or Tomahawks. People seem to forget that the B-52 is capable of launching these weapons at standoff ranges, and that any Chinese air defense systems on the mainland would be quickly and efficiently eliminated in the opening stages of a conflict.
 
.
The US would be able to target facilities deep within Chinese territory using a combination of stealthy JASSM, AGM-86C/D, or Tomahawks. People seem to forget that the B-52 is capable of launching these weapons at standoff ranges, and that any Chinese air defense systems on the mainland would be quickly and efficiently eliminated in the opening stages of a conflict.
All of that is just w*nkery. If there's any strike of any kind on the Chinese homeland this will be the response:
df_41.jpg
 
.
All of that is just w*nkery. If there's any strike of any kind on the Chinese homeland this will be the response:
df_41.jpg

And you have forgotten that the Chinese have a no-first-use policy in place. Neither the Chinese nor the US would want to take things nuclear if there ever is a "shock-and-awe" campaign against the Chinese mainland.
 
.
And you have forgotten that the Chinese have a no-first-use policy in place.
It's not no-first-use, it's no-first-use*, there's a lot of fine print. Even if that policy was as you imagine it, you want to bet your existence on China sticking to it in a conflict? I don't.
Neither the Chinese nor the US would want to take things nuclear if there ever is a "shock-and-awe" campaign against the Chinese mainland.
I doesn't work that way, there are no "shock-and-awe" campaigns against the homeland of a nuclear power - that you can think, let alone write, something like that is beyond my comprehension. If the US dares anything like that it gets its cities turned into molten glass.
 
.
It's not no-first-use, it's no-first-use*, there's a lot of fine print. Even if that policy was as you imagine it, you want to bet your existence on China sticking to it in a conflict? I don't.

I'm assuming that you've consulted with those who formulated this policy to know all about the "fine print", or is this another presumption of yours?

I doesn't work that way, there are no "shock-and-awe" campaigns against the homeland of a nuclear power - that you can think, let alone write, something like that is beyond my comprehension. If the US dares anything like that it gets its cities turned into molten glass.

Turning US cities into "molten glass" is indeed something that is beyond anyone's comprehension, especially in the context of China. The US has platforms capable of launching radar-evading terrain-hugging missiles at Chinese coastal facilities and yet there are those who believe that such an operation would be impossible simply because China is a "nuclear power".
 
.
I'm assuming that you've consulted with those who formulated this policy to know all about the "fine print", or is this another presumption of yours?



Turning US cities into "molten glass" is indeed something that is beyond anyone's comprehension, especially in the context of China. The US has platforms capable of launching radar-evading terrain-hugging missiles at Chinese coastal facilities and yet there are those who believe that such an operation would be impossible simply because China is a "nuclear power".
This is getting tiresome. The US wouldn't dare attack North Korea because it has a few oversized firecrackers, attacking China is too ridiculous to waste a single word on and unfortunately I've wasted quite a few on this asinine subject. No longer.
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom